О формировании системы национального планирования в России

Polterovich, Victor (2015): О формировании системы национального планирования в России. Forthcoming in: Journal of the New Economic Association , Vol. 2, No. 26

Abstract

We propose to distinguish between two “ideal” types of national planning: the universal and the program planning. The first is aimed at accelerating the balanced development of industries and regions through large-scale investment projects; it requires a hierarchy of specialized planning institutions. The second uses a relatively small number of programs aimed at addressing key economic problems. These programs are worked out by the ministries and agencies, which are also engaged in the current management. In developing countries, national planning tends to be the first type, and in the developed ones, it tends to be the second. In Russia, elements of both types of systems have spontaneously arisen. From them, it is necessary to form a mixed system that would be adequate to the Russian level of development. Its contours are discussed in the paper.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: On the Formation of National Planning System in Russia
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: indicative planning, budgeting, industrial policy, national innovation system
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O21 - Planning Models ; Planning Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P11 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P21 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

References

Andryushkevich О.А. (2012). National Planning in Economies of Different Types. Kapital strany. Federal online edition. Available at: http://www.kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/199716/#a1 (accessed: May 2015, in Russian).

On Strategic Planning in Russian Federation (2014). Federal Law of Russian Federation. June 28, 2014. No. 172-ФЗ. Available at: http://www.rg.ru/2014/07/03/strategia-dok.html (accessed: May 2015, in Russian).

Polterovich V. M. (2014). Where to Go: Twenty Four Theses. Economic Science of Contemporary Russia 3(66), 7–16 (in Russian).

Polterovich V., Popov V., Tonis А. (2007). Economic Policy, Quality of Institutions, and Mechanisms of Resource Curse. М.: SU HSE Publishing House (in Russian).

Khrustalev А.А, Tishchenko Т.V., Sokolov I.А. (2013). Studying Influence of Program Target Approach on the Budget Process, Ways of Improving the Methodology and the Information System of Result-Oriented Budgeting. М: RANERA (in Russian).

Heilmann S., Melton O. (2013). The Reinvention of Development Planning in China, 1993–2012. Modern China XX(X), 1–49.

Martin E., Tytell I., Yakadina I. (2011). France: Lessons from Past Fiscal Consolidation Plans. IMF Working Paper WP/11/89.

Martin P. (2014). The Humbling of the NDRC. China’s National Development and Reform Commission Searches for a New Role Amid Restructuring. China Brief XIV, 5, March 7, 14–18.

Schick A. (2013). The Metamorphoses of Performance Budgeting. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=GOV/PGC/SBO(2013)5&doclanguage=en (accessed: Maу 2015).

Xu Ch. (2011). The Fundamental Institutions of China’s Reforms and Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(4), 1076–1151.