Do private campaing contributions affect electoral results? An examination of Argentine national elections

Freille, Sebastián (2015): Do private campaing contributions affect electoral results? An examination of Argentine national elections.

Abstract

In this paper we examine the impact of campaign contributions on electoral results in Argentine elections for the period 2003-2013. We provide a model of a multi-party electoral competition with mixed campaign contributions. Using previously unavailable micro-level data on private campaign contributions we test several hypothesis concerning the relationship between contributions and electoral results. Our findings suggest that while parties receive both public and private funds, only private contributions are significantly associated with electoral performance --i.e. the higher the ratio of private to public contributions the higher the vote share. Interestingly, while challengers see an increase in vote shares as a result of an increase in private contributions, this is not the case for incumbents. One possible explanation for this is that incumbents have other sources of funding available to them --official advertising, informal campaign spending- which are substitutes to formal private funding. This intuition has important implications for policy design as limiting or prohibiting private contributions in the legal regime may actually be more detrimental to challengers than to incumbents, with the likely effect of increasing incumbency advantage.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS; ELECTIONS; LOBBYING; ARGENTINA
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation

References

Abramowitz, Alan I, \Explaining senate election outcomes," The American Political Science Review, 1988, pp. 385{403.

Chappell, H.W., \Campaign contributions and congressional voting: A simultaneous probit-tobit model," The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1982, 64 (1), 77{83.

Feldman, P. and J. Jondrow, \Congressional Elections and Local Federal," American Journal of Political Science, 1984, pp. 147{164.

Frendreis, John P and Richard W Waterman, \PAC CONTRIBUTIONS AND LEGISLATIVE BEHAVIOR-SENATE VOTING ON TRUCKING DEREGULATION," Social Science Quarterly, 1985, 66 (2), 401{412.

Gerber, A., \Estimating the e�ect of campaign spending on senate election outcomes using instrumental variables," American Political Science Review, 1998, pp. 401{411. 23

Green, D.P. and J.S. Krasno, \Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: Reestimating the e�ects of campaign spending in House elections," American Journal of Political Science, 1988, pp. 884{907.

Jacobson, G.C., \The e�ects of campaign spending in congressional elections," The American Political Science Review, 1978, pp. 469{491.

, \Money and votes reconsidered: Congressional elections, 1972{1982," Public Choice, 1985, 47 (1), 7{62.

Kau, James B, Donald Keenan, and Paul H Rubin, \A general equilibrium model of congressional voting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1982, pp. 271{293.

Levitt, S.D., \Using repeat challengers to estimate the e�ect of campaign spending on election outcomes in the US House," Journal of Political Economy, 1994, pp. 777{798.

Moon, W., \The paradox of less e�cient incumbent spending: Theory and tests," in \Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL" 2002.

Palda, F. and K. Palda, \The impact of campaign expenditures on political competition in the French legislative elections of 1993," Public choice, 1998, 94 (1), 157{174.

Ragsdale, L. and T.E. Cook, \Representatives' actions and challengers' reactions: Limits to candidate connections in the House," American Journal of Political Science, 1987, pp. 45{81.

Rubio, Delia Ferreira, S GRINER, and D ZOVATTO, \Financiamiento pol��tico: rendici�on de cuentas y divulgaci�on," De las normas a las buenas pr�acticas. El desaf��o del �nanciamiento pol��tico en Am�erica Latina, OEA/IDEA, San Jos�e, 2004, pp. 77{106.

Rubio, Delia Matilde Ferreira, Financiamiento de partidos pol��ticos, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 1997.

Samuels, David, \Incumbents and challengers on a level playing �eld: assessing the impact of campaign �nance in Brazil," The journal of Politics, 2001, 63 (02), 569{584.

Stratmann, T., \What do campaign contributions buy? Deciphering causal e�ects of money and votes," Southern Economic Journal, 1991, pp. 606{620.

Tosini, Suzanne C and Edward Tower, \The textile bill of 1985: The determinants of congressional voting patterns," Public Choice, 1987, 54 (1), 19{25.