bouayad-agha-Hamouche, salima and turpin, nadine and védrine, lionel (2012): Fostering the potential endogenous development of European regions: a spatial dynamic panel data analysis of the Cohesion Policy. Published in: Regional Studies , Vol. 9, No. 47 (2013): pp. 1573-1593.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_65470.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, we use a conditional-convergence eco nometric model to investigate whether the Cohesion Policy affect the European economies. The main contribution of our study is to consider both spatial and temporal dynamics in assessing the impact of European cohesion policy. Econometric estimations rely on a dataset of 143 EU14-NUTS1/NUTS2 regions from 1980 to 2005. Our results suggest that Objective 1 programmes have a direct effect on regional GDP p.c. growth rates, whereas total structural funds do not. Moreover, consideration of the spatial dimension of the panel brings to light a still significant, but less important, impact of structural funds.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Fostering the potential endogenous development of European regions: a spatial dynamic panel data analysis of the Cohesion Policy |
English Title: | Fostering the potential endogenous development of European regions: a spatial dynamic panel data analysis of the Cohesion Policy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Dynamic panels, GMM, Regional Convergence, Spatial Dependence, Structural Funds |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R15 - Econometric and Input-Output Models ; Other Models |
Item ID: | 65470 |
Depositing User: | Dr Nadine Turpin |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jul 2015 16:28 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 14:23 |
References: | Abreu M., De Groot H. L. F. and Florax R. J. G. M. (2005) Space and growth: a survey of empirical evidence and methods, Region et Développement 21, 13–44. Anderson T. W. and Hsiao C. (1982) Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data, Journal of Econometrics 18, 47–82. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(82)90095-1 Angrist J. D. and Pischke J. S. (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's CompanionPrinceton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Anselin L. (2001) Spatial econometrics, Theoretical EconometricsBaltagi B. H. (Eds) Blackwell, Oxford310–330. Anselin L. (2002) Under the hood issues in the specification and interpolation of spatial regression models, Agricultural Economics 27, 247–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x Arellano M. and Bond S. (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies 58, 277–297. doi: 10.2307/2297968 Aschauer D. A. (1989) Is public infrastructure productive?, Journal of Monetary Economics 23(2), 177–200. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0 Badinger H., Müller W. G. and Tondl G. (2004) Regional convergence in the European Union, 1985–99: a spatial dynamic panel analysis, Regional Studies 38, 541–253. doi: 10.1080/003434042000211105 Bajo-Rubio O. (2000) A further generalization of the Solow growth model: the role of the public sector, Economic Letters 68(1), 79–84. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00220-2 Baltagi B. H. and Liu L. (2008) Testing for random effects and spatial lag dependence in panel data models, Statistics and Probability Letters 78, 3304–3306. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2008.06.014 Baltagi B. H., Song S. H., Jung B. C. and Koh W. (2007) Testing for serial correlation, spatial autocorrelation and random effects using panel data, Journal of Econometrics 140(1), 5–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.09.001 Baltagi B. H., Song S. H. and Koh W. (2003) Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation, Journal of Econometrics 117, 123–150. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00120-9 Barro R. J. (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth, Journal of Political Economy 98(5), 103–126. doi: 10.1086/261726 Barro R. J. and Sala-i-Martin X. (1992) Convergence, Journal of Political Economy 100, 407–443. doi: 10.1086/261816 Beck N., Gleditsch K. S. and Beardsley K. (2006) Space is more than geography: using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy, International Studies Quarterly 50, 27–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00391.x Becker S. O., Egger P. H. and von Ehrlich M. (2010) Going NUTS: the effect of EU Structural Funds on regional performance, Journal of Public Economics 94(9–10), 578–590. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.006 Blonigen B. A., Davies R. B., Waddell G. R. and Naughton H. T. (2007) FDI in space: spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment, European Economic Review 51, 1303–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.08.006 Bond S. (2002) Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice, Portuguese Economic Journal 1, 141–162. doi: 10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9 Bouayad-Agha S. and Védrine L. (2010) Estimations strategies for a spatial dynamic panel using GMM. A new approach to the convergence issue of European regions, Spatial Economic Analysis 5(2), 205–228. doi: 10.1080/17421771003730711 Bouvet F. and Dall'Erba S. (2010) European regional Structural Funds: how large is the influence of politics on the allocation process?, Journal of Common Market Studies 48, 501–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02062.x Caselli F., Esquivel G. and Lefort F. (1996) Reopening the convergence debate: a new look at cross-country growth empirics, Journal of Economic Growth 1, 363–389. doi: 10.1007/BF00141044 Crescenzi R. (2009) Undermining the principle of concentration? European Union regional policy and the socio-economic disadvantage of European regions, Regional Studies 43(1), 111–134. doi: 10.1080/00343400801932276 Dall'Erba S. and Le Gallo J. (2008) Regional convergence and the impact of European Structural Funds 1989–1999: a spatial econometric analysis, Papers in Regional Science 82(2), 219–244. Durlauf S., Johnson P. and Temple J. (Eds) (2006) Growth econometrics, Handbook of Economic Growth, pp. 555–677. North Holland, Amsterdam. Ederveen S., De Groot H. and Nahuis R. (2006) Fertile soil for Structural Funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European cohesion policy, Kyklos 59, 17–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00318.x Elhorst J. P. (2005) Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of linear and log–linear dynamic models for spatial panels, Geographical Analysis 37, 85–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2005.00577.x Elhorst J. P., Arbia G. and Arbia G. (2010) Growth and convergence in a multiregional model with space–time dynamics, Geographical Analysis 42(3), 338–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2010.00796.x Ertur C. and Koch W. (2007) Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: theory and evidence, Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(6), 1033–1062. doi: 10.1002/jae.963 29. Esposti R. and Bussoletti S. (2008) Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European union: a panel-data approach, Regional Studies 42, 159–173. doi: 10.1080/00343400601142753 European Commission (1988) Fourteenth ERDF Annual Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee. COM(90) 136 final, 10 May 1990. European Commission, Brussels. European Commission (1999) 11th Annual Report on the Structural FundsCOM 2000, 698 final. European Commission, Brussels. European Commission (2004) Fourth Report on Economic and Social CohesionEuropean commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy, Brussels. European Commission (2008) Growing Regions, Growing Europe – Fifth Progress Report on Economic and Social Cohesion – Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council (COM (2008) 371)European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy, Brussels. Fuest C. and Huber B. (2006) Can regional policy in a federation improve economic efficiency?, Journal of Public Economics 90(3), 499–511. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.01.004 Gramlich E. M. (1994) Infrastructure investment: a review essay, Journal of Economic Literature 32(3), 1176–1196. Hagen T. and Mohl P. (2009) Econometric Evaluation of EU Cohesion Policy: A Survey. Discussion Papers Number 09-052. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim. Hahn J. and Kuersteiner G. (2002) Asymptotically unbiased inference for a dynamic panel model with fixed effects when both n and T are large, Econometrica 70, 1639–1657. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00344 Islam N. (1995) Growth empirics: a panel data approach, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 1127–1170. doi: 10.2307/2946651 Keller W. (2002) Geographic localization of international technology diffusion, American Economic Review 92, 120–142. doi: 10.1257/000282802760015630 Jacobs J. P. A. M., Ligthart J. E. and Vrijburg H. (2009) Dynamic Panel Data Models Featuring Endogenous Interaction and Spatially Correlated Errors. Discussion Paper Number 2009-92. Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg. Kemmerling A. and Bodenstein T. (2006) Partisan politics in regional redistribution: do parties affect the distribution of EU Structural Funds across regions?, European Union Politics 7(3), 373–392. doi: 10.1177/1465116506066264 Korniotis G. M. (2010) Estimating panel models with internal external habit formation, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 28(1), 145–158. doi: 10.1198/jbes.2009.08041 Krugman P. (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy 199(1), 483–499. doi: 10.1086/261763 Kukenova M. and Monteiro J. A. (2008) Spatial Dynamic Panel Model and System GMM: A Monte Carlo Investigation. Paper Number 13405. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Munich. Lee L. F. and Yu J. 2010aA spatial dynamic panel data model with both time and individual fixed effects, Econometric Theory 26(2), 564–597. doi: 10.1017/S0266466609100099 Lopez-Bazo E., Vaya E. and Artis M. (2004) Regional externalities and growth, Journal of Regional Science 44(1), 43–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2004.00327.x Lucas R. E. (1988) On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics 22(1), 3–42. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7 Martin P. (1998) Can regional policies affect growth and geography in Europe?, World Economy 21(6), 757–774. doi: 10.1111/1467-9701.00162 Martin P. (1999) Public policies, regional inequalities and growth, Journal of Public Economics 73(1), 85–105. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00110-8 Mohl P. and Hagen T. (2010) Do EU Structural Funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches, Regional Science and Urban Economics 40(5), 353–365. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.005 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006) The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and GovernanceOECD, Paris. Rodriguez-Pose A. and Fratesi U. (2004) Between development and social policies: the impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 regions, Regional Studies 38(1), 97–113. doi: 10.1080/00343400310001632226 Romer P. (1986) Increasing returns and long run growth, Journal of Political Economy 95(5), 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420 Roodman D. (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments, Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics 71(1), 135–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x Solow R. M. (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic, Quarterly Journal of Econometrics 70, 65–94. Swan T. W. (1956) Economic growth and capital accumulation, Economic Record 32, 334–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1956.tb00434.x Temple J. W. (1999) The new growth evidence, Journal of Economic Literature 37(1), 112–156. doi: 10.1257/jel.37.1.112 Védrine L. (2011) Interactions spatiales entre régions européennes et politique de cohésion: quel effet sur le développement économique? PhD thesis, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand. Yu J., De Jong R. and Lee L. F. (2008) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large, Journal of Econometrics 146, 118–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.08.002 Yu J. and Lee L. F. (2009) Convergence: A Spatial Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Working Paper, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/65470 |