Ščasný, Milan and Rečka, Lukáš and Balajka, Jiří (2012): What Is Effect of Climate Change Mitigating Policies on Energy Sector in Slovakia?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_66606.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
We assess the impacts of more strict regulation than the EU-wide 20% CO2 reduction target in 2020 on Slovak energy sector. Linear dynamic optimisation model MESSAGE with very detailed structure of Slovak energy sector is used for the assessment of impacts of imposing a carbon tax of €17 per tonne of CO2 and for two emission caps on CO2 emission that follow the EU policy to tighten the GHG target at the EU. The impacts on the fuel-mix and the technology-mix of energy sector in Slovakia, air quality and GHG emission, economic costs are assessed. Environmental benefits attributable to air pollutants and greenhouse gasses are quantified by using the ExternE impact pathway analysis. The impacts of 17€ scenario are similar to the baseline scenario. The Slovak public electricity sector achieves CO2 emission intensity of 0.465 t CO2 per MWh that is lower than the EC benchmark already in 2009. Maximal feasible CO2 emission reduction in the Slovak electricity sector is 24.6 % compared to the year 2005. The average carbon intensity will decline to 0.057 tCO2 per MWh in 2020 and result in 15.4 % reduction of CO2 in 2020 compared to the 17€ scenario level. Total production costs are €481 million higher (18.6%) in Cap24.6 scenario. As a consequence of the emission reduction, the externality costs are €190 million smaller in CAP24.6 scenario than in the 17€ scenario in 2020. Our results indicate that it is feasible to reduce CO2 emissions in the power sector in Slovakia more than the 20% reduction target set at the EU level.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | What Is Effect of Climate Change Mitigating Policies on Energy Sector in Slovakia? |
English Title: | What Is Effect of Climate Change Mitigating Policies on Energy Sector in Slovakia? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | optimisation model; energy system; MESSAGE model; climate change mitigation; external costs |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q41 - Demand and Supply ; Prices Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q47 - Energy Forecasting Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs ; Distributional Effects ; Employment Effects |
Item ID: | 66606 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Milan Ščasný |
Date Deposited: | 14 Sep 2015 04:35 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 12:33 |
References: | de Bruyn, S, Markowska, A., Nelissen, D., Šcasný, M., Balajka, J., Rečka, L., 2011. Moving toward a 30% carbon reduction target in the EU: economic impacts in Slovakia. Delft, CE Delft, 2011 EC, 2010. Capros, P., Mantzos, L., Tasios, N., De Vita, A., Kouvaritakis, N., EU energy trends to 2030 : Update 2009. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2010 ECOSYS, 2010. Balajka, J. Pravidelná aktualizácia projekcií základných znečisťujúcich látok a skleníkových plynov (Regular Actualisation of Basic Air Emission and GHGs Forecast). Bratislava : ECOSYS, 2010 ENTEC, 2008. Support for the Impact Assessment in the Context of the Review of Directive 2003/87/EC. Further Harmonisation and Increased Predictability. Report for the European Com-mission DG ENV.C.2. Entec UK Limited, January 2008 EREC, 2010. Mapping Renewable Energy Pathways towards 2020: EU Roadmap Brussels : European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), 2010 Fraunhofer ISI; ENERDATA; ISIS; Technical University Vienna, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy WI, 2009. Study on the Energy Savings Potentials in EU Member States, Candidate Countries and EEA Countries, Final report for the European Commission DG TREN, Karlsruhe ; Grenoble ; Rome ; Vienna ; Wuppertal:, March 2009 IEA, 2009. World energy Outlook, 2009. Paris : International Energy Agency (IEA), 2009 IAEA. 2002. Model for Energy Supply Strategy Alternatives - User Manual, 2002 Jaeger, C., Paroussos, L., Mangalagiu, D., Kupers, R., Mandel, A. & Tàbara,J.D., 2011. A New Growth Path for Europe. Generating Prosperity and Jobs in the Low-Carbon Economy - Synthesis Report. European Climate Forum e.V. Jerabaj, S. & Iniyan, S., 2006. A review of energy models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10 , pp. 281–311 Kouvaritakis N, Stroblos N, Paroussos L, Revesz T, Zalai E, van Regemorter, D. 2005. Energy Taxation in Enlarged Europe. Report for the DG TAXUD. www.ecmodels.eu/index_files/Page1211.htm. Livermore, S., 2004. An Econometric Model of the Slovak Republic, Financial Policy Institute – Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic, Máca, V., Melichar, J., Ščasný, M. (2012). Internalization of External Costs of Energy Generation in Central and Eastern European Countries. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21(2), 181-197. doi:10.1177/1070496512442504. Meyer B., Lutz C., 2007. The GINFORS Model: Model Overview and Evaluation. http://www.petre.org.uk/pdf/sept08/petrE_WP3%202%20Ginfors.pdf. Meyer B, Lutz C, Wolter I (2005): Global Multisector/Multicountry 3-E Modelling: From COMPASS to GINFORS. Revista de Economia Mundial, 13:77–97. Nezi and Capros, 2011. Mary N. Nezi and P. Capros. The biomass futures project Presentation for the Workshop on sustainable biomass options to meet the RED targets for 2020. Brussels, April 12th, 2011 Pye, S., Holland, M., van Regemorter, D., Wagner, A., Wattkiss, P., (2008): Analysis of the Costs and Benefits of Proposed Revisions to the National Emission Ceilings Directive. NEC CBA Report 3. National Emission Ceilings for 2020 based on the 2008 Climate & Energy Package. AEA Energy & Environment; Prepared for the European Commission DG Environment C.5, London, July 2008. Preiss, P., Friedrich, R., Klotz, V., (2008). Procedure and data to generate aver-aged/aggregated data. Deliverable n◦ D.1.1 – RS 3a. R&D Project NEEDS–New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability. Project report prepared for DG Research European Commission. Resh, G., Panzer, C., Busch, S., Ragwitz, M., Rosende, D., Rothova, M., 2010. Renewable Energy Industry Roadmap for Slovakia, REPAP 2020, March 2010 SEPS, 2011a. Správa o prevádzke elektrizačnej sústavy Slovenskej republiky 2010. SEPS, a.s. SEPS, 2011b. Program rozvoja SEPS, a.s. na roky 2012-2021. SEPS, a.s. Január 2011 Van Regemorter, D., 2008. Assessment of the macroeconomic impacts of NEC Scenarios with GEM-E3. April 2008. Study prepared for the DG Environment, European Commission. Weinzettel, J., Havránek, M., Ščasný, M., (2012). A consumption based indicator of external costs of electricity. Ecological Indicators, Volume 17, Issue (June, 2012), p. 68-76. ISSN: 1470-160X DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.035. Other sources Data Base on Energy Saving Potentials - http://www.eepotential.eu |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/66606 |