Chakraborty, Lekha S (2014): Macroeconomics of “NaMo” Budget 2014 in India. Published in: Yojana No. 2014 (2014)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_67045.pdf Download (228kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The present government has inherited an economy characterised by low growth, high inflation, high current account deficit and large fiscal imbalance at the Union level. What has struck me about Union budget 2014-15 is not the fiscal arithmetic, but the macroeconomic framework. One could sense a deal for fiscal-monetary policy co-ordination in the budget speech, especially with the announcement of Finance Minister for a “New Monetary framework”. The paper focuses on the macroeconomic framework of the budget rather than dealing with the fiscal arithmetic, in terms of policy announcements and budgetary allocations. The dynamics between North Block and Mint Road is always challenging, and so far India has witnessed a fiscal dominance, over monetary policy.The announcement by Finance Minister on “new monetary framework” for India needs to be co-read with the advancements in RBI seeking more ‘central bank independence’ to manage inflation and how it plays out in the macroeconomic context of India in light of the Expert Committee to Revise and Strengthen the Monetary Policy Framework. The underlying macroeconomic framework of the budget revealed two thematic priorities of the present government; (i) growth revival and (ii) macroeconomic stability. This sets the track. The Union budget was simultaneously ensuring a ‘continuity’ and ‘change’. The ‘continuity’ elements in the budget may be to ensure a bipartisan approach in tackling the issues of national interest, especially in case of fiscal consolidation path of earlier government. However the ‘changes’ suggested in the budget in terms of new monetary framework is disturbing.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Macroeconomics of “NaMo” Budget 2014 in India |
English Title: | Macroeconomics of “NaMo” Budget 2014 in India |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Fiscal Consolidation , New Monetary Framework, Union Budget India |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt |
Item ID: | 67045 |
Depositing User: | Lekha S Chakraborty |
Date Deposited: | 05 Oct 2015 13:22 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 15:05 |
References: | Acemoglu, Daron and JamesRobinson, 2012.WHY Nations fail? , Crown. Arestis, Philip 2009. "New Consensus Macroeconomics: A Critical Appraisal," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_564, Levy Economics Institute. Chakraborty Lekha, 2008. Analysing Raghuram Rajan Committee report on financial sector reforms, Economic and Political Weekly, 2008. Chakraborty , L, 2002. Fiscal Deficit and Rate of Interest Link in India: An Econometric Analysis of Deregulated Financial Regime, in Economic and Political Weekly, May 11-17, 2002, Volume XXXVII No. 19. Chakraborty, L, 2007. "Fiscal Deficit, Capital Formation, and Crowding Out in India: Evidence from an Asymmetric VAR Model," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_518, The Levy Economics Institute, New York. Chakraborty, L, 2012. Interest Rate Determination in India: Empirical Evidence on Fiscal Deficit--Interest Rate Linkages and Financial Crowding Out," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_744, The Levy Economics Institute, New York. Chakraborty, Pinaki & Chakraborty, Lekha S, 2006. "Is Fiscal Policy Contracyclical in India: An Empirical Analysis," MPRA Paper 7604, University Library of Munich, Germany. Government of India, 2014, Union Budget, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. Government of India, 2009.,Report of the Committee on Financial Sector Reforms. A Hundred Small Steps, Raghuram Rajan report, Planning Commission, New Delhi. Nelson, Richard R., 2008. "What enables rapid economic progress: What are the needed institutions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-11, February. North, C Douglass (1991): “Institutions”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1, (Winter, 1991), pp. 97-112. Reserve Bank of India 2014.The report of report of the Expert Committee to revise and strengthen the monetary policy framework (Urjit Patel report), RBI, Mumbai. Reserve Bank of India, 1985. Committee to Review the Working of the Monetary System, (Sukhamoy Chakravarty report), RBI, Mumbai Vinod, Hrishikesh, Lekha Chakraborty and Honey Karun, 2014,If Deficit is not the Culprit, What Determines Indian Interest Rates? Evaluation Using the Maximum Entropy Bootstrap, Working paper 811, The Levy Economics Institute, New york (July). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/67045 |