Economía y ciencias sociales: reporte de investigación

Estrada, Fernando (2015): Economía y ciencias sociales: reporte de investigación.

Abstract

The theoretical economy is diverse and contains frameworks and models of different research. This article proposes a body of recognized theories and methods, not only for the so-called mainstream, but more heterodox approaches. In addition to paying attention to currents and authors who have analyzed the economy from an epistemological point of view. A selective picture that also corresponds to the research conducted by the author and his exploration of methods of integrated social science analysis is offered. In short, frameworks and contents of the article are mainly the nature of a research report.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Economics and social sciences: Technical report
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Methods, Models, Paradigms, Microeconomics, Macroeconomics
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General > B00 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B15 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary

References

Paul Krugman, “That Old-Time Inequality Denial”, N/T, may. 2014.

Raul V. Fabella, “The Picketty Inequality in the Nash-Bargained Social Contract”, UP School of Economics, 2014.

Odran Bonnet, Pierre-Henri Bono, Guillaume Chapelle et Étienne Wasmer, Does housing capital contribute to inequality? A comment on Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century, Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers, 2014.

Francois Bonnet, Clement Theory. “Sociology and political science in the patrimonial society: implications of Piketty’s Capital. 2014”.

Javier López Bernardo, Félix López Martínez and Engelbert Stockhammer, “A Post-Keynesian Response to Piketty’s “Fundamental Contradiction of Capitalism”.

Cowen y Stiglitz. Tyler Cowen, “Capital Punishment,” Foreign Affairs, 2014.

J. Stiglitz, “Phony Capitalism,” Harper’s Magazine, 2014.

R. M. Solow, “Thomas Piketty Is Right,” New Republic, April 22, 2014.

Branko Milanovic, “The Return of ‘Patrimonial Capitalism’: Review of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6974, July 2014.