Silvestri, Paolo (2015): Anthropology of freedom and tax justice: between exchange and gift. Thoughts for an interdisciplinary research agenda. Published in: Teoria e Critica della Regolazione Sociale No. 2 (2015): pp. 115-132.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_67644.pdf Download (376kB) | Preview |
Abstract
With this paper I try to sketch a research agenda on the basis of which humanities and social sciences might interact with each other, searching for a human common ground in tax issues. To this purpose I shall proceed as follows: (§2) I will sketch two working hypotheses showing how and why tax system raises anthropological issues at the intersection of Philosophy of law, Politics and Economics; to restrict the field of enquiry, I will then analyse, firstly (§2.1), the most common theories of taxation – benefit-cost principle and ability-to-pay principle – usually meant as attempts to answer the demand for tax justice; and, secondly (§2.2), the issue of freedom in taxation as a problem of legal-political and economic obligation. I will then show how the research might gain some insight from both (§3.1) the literature on homo reciprocans, and (§3.2) the literature on gift-giving, which might allow us to better articulate the demands for justice and freedom, as well as to glimpse the human foundations of a new fiscal democracy.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Anthropology of freedom and tax justice: between exchange and gift. Thoughts for an interdisciplinary research agenda |
English Title: | Anthropology of freedom and tax justice: between exchange and gift. Thoughts for an interdisciplinary research agenda |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | freedom; justice; tax; ability-to-pay principle; benefit-received principle; gift; exchange; voluntary exchange; trust; reciprocity; fiscal democracy. |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H20 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification |
Item ID: | 67644 |
Depositing User: | Dr Paolo Silvestri |
Date Deposited: | 05 Nov 2015 14:55 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 13:47 |
References: | Allingham, M.G., Sandmo A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics 1: 323 – 338. Alm J. (2014). Expanding the Theory of Tax Compliance from Individual to Group Motivations. In Forte, Mudambi, Navarra (2014), 260-77. Alm, J., McClelland, G.H., & Schulze, W.D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48 (1), 21–38. Androni J., Enrard B., Feinstein J. (1988). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXVI, 2, 818-860. Anspach M. (2002 [2007]). A buon rendere. La reciprocità nella vendetta nel dono e nel mercato. Torino, Bollati Boringhieri. Auerbach A.J., Hassett K.A. (2002). A New Measure of Horizontal Equity. The American Economic Review. 92, 4: 1116-1125. Backhaus J. G. (ed.) (2013). Essentials of Fiscal Sociology. Conceptions of an Encyclopedia, Series: Finanzsoziologie – Vol. 5, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main. Barassi M. (2005). The notion of tax and the different types of taxes. In Part I. The Concept of Tax in EU Member States. General Introduction and Comparative Analysis (Draft 06 05 2005) in: http://www.eatlp.org/uploads/public/part_I_concept_of_tax_in_eu_member_states_05_05_09.pdf Bellanca N. (1993). La teoria della finanza pubblica in Italia, 1883-1946. Saggio storico sulla scuola italiana di economia pubblica. Leo Olschki: Firenze. Binmore, K. (2005). Natural Justice. Oxford University Press, New York. Brennan G. (2008). Homo economicus and homo politicus: an introduction. Public Choice, 137, 429-438. Brennan G., Buchanan J.M. ([1980] 2000). The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc. Buchanan J.M. (1967 [1999]). Public Finance in Democratic Process: Fiscal Institutions and Individual Choice. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Buchanan J.M. (2008). In search of homunculus politicus. Public Choice, 137, 469-474. Bullain (2004). Explaining Percentage Philanthropy: Legal Nature, Rationales, Impacts. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 7, 1, on line: http://www.icnl.org/research/journal/vol6iss4/art_3.htm#_edn13. Bruni L. (2010). L’ethos del mercato. Un’introduzione ai fondamenti antropologici e relazionali dell’economia, Bruno Mondadori, Milano. Caillé A. (1998). Il terzo paradigma. Antropologia filosofica del dono. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. Caillé A. (1998). Di chi fidarsi? Dono, fiducia, e indebitamento reciproco positivo. In Godbout (1998: 97-108). Carrico K. (2013). Towards an anthropology of taxation. In Anthropology News UK, May, 16-17. Cedrini M.A., Marchionatti R. (2013). On the Theoretical and Practical Relevance of the Concept of Gift to the Development of a Non-Imperialist Economics (October 29, 2013). CESMEP Working paper 3/2013. Cox J.C. (2012). Private goods, public goods, and common pools with Homo Reciprocans. Southern Economic Journal, 79 (1), 1–14. Cullis J.G. and Lewis, A. (1997). Why people pay taxes: From a conventional economic model to a model of social convention. Journal of Economic Psychology 18: 305 – 321. Douglas M. (1986). How Institutions Think. New York, Syracuse University Press. Dworkin R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Harvard university press. Dworkin R. (2006). Is Democracy possible here? Principles for a new political debate. Pricenton, Princeton University press. Einaudi L. (1949). Lezioni di politica sociale. Torino, Einaudi. Einaudi L. (2006). Selected Economic Essays. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Einaudi, L. On Abstract and Historical Hypotheses and on Value judgments in Economic Sciences, edited with an Introduction and an Afterword by Paolo Silvestri, Routledge, London - New York (Forthcoming: 2016). Einaudi L. (2014 [1940]). Myths and Paradoxes of Justice in Taxation. In Einaudi (2014). Einaudi L. (2014). Selected Economic Essays. Vol. II. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Epstein R.A. (1986). Taxation in a Lockean World. Social Philosophy and Policy, 4: 49-74. Falsitta G. (2008). Giustizia tributaria e tirannia fiscale. Milano: Giuffrè. Feld L.P., Frey B.S. (2000). Trust Breeds Trust: How Taxpayers Are Treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87-99. Feld L.P., Frey B.S. (2007). Tax Compliance as the Result of a Psychological Tax Contract: The Role of Incentives and Responsive Regulation. Law and policy, 29, 1: 102-120. Feld L.P., Tyran J.R., (2006). Achieving Compliance when Legal Sanctions are Non-deterrent. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(1), 135-156. Forte F. (2009). L’economia liberale di Luigi Einaudi. Saggi. Firenze: Leo Olschki. Forte F., Marchionatti R. (2012). Luigi Einaudi’s economics of liberalism. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19:4, 587-624. Forte, F., Silvestri, P. (2013). Pareto’s sociological maximum of utility of the community and the theory of the elites. In: J. G. Backhaus (ed.) (2013), 231-265. Forte F., Mudambi R., Navarra P.M., (Eds.) (2014). A Handbook of alternative theories in Public economics. Chelthenam, Edward Elgar. Forte F. The social pact-contractarian approach to taxes as prices of public services. Paper presented at the Conference of International Atlantic Economic Society (Milan, March, 13, 2015, not published). Fossati A., Silvestri P., (2012). Un inedito dissidio epistemologico sui Miti e paradossi di Einaudi: le lettere perdute di Mauro Fasiani. Studi economici, 3, 5-81. Freid B. (1999). The Puzzling Case for Proportionate Taxation, 2 Chap. L. Rev.: 157-195. Gaisbauer H.P., Schweiger G., Sedmak C. (Eds.) (2015). Philosophical Explorations of Justice and Taxation: National and Global Issues, Springer. Gambetta D. (Ed.) (1988). Trust. Making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. Giardina E. (1961). Le basi teoriche del principio della capacità contribuiva. Milano, Giuffè. Godbout J. T., in collaboration with A. Caillé, (2002 [1998]). The World of the Gift. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press; it. transl.: Bollati Boringhieri, 2002. Godbout J. T. (1998). Il linguaggio del dono. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. Griziotti (1949). Il principio della capacità contributiva e le sue applicazioni. Rivista di diritto finanziario, I: 15-33. Hall R.E., Rabushka A. (1995). The Flat tax. Stanford CA: Hoober Institution press. Halliday D. (2013). Philosophy Compass 8/12: 1111–1122. Harsanyi, J.C. (1975). Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’s theory. American Political Science Review 69: 594–606. Hayek Friedrich A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago, University of Chicago press. Hayek Friedrich A. (1976). The Mirage of Social Justice, Vol. 2 of Law, Legislation and Liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Heritier P. (2012). Useless Non-Preaching? The Critical Point and the Complex Anthropology of Freedom in Luigi Einaudi, in Heritier, Silvestri (2012), 275-312. Heritier P., Silvestri P. (Eds.) (2012). Good government, Governance and Human Complexity. Luigi Einaudi’s Legacy and Contemporary Society, Leo Olschki, Firenze. Heritier P. (2013). Affectio iuris: dalla “svolta linguistica” alla “svolta affettiva”?. Teoria e critica della regolazione sociale, 7: 37-61. Heritier P. (2014). La dignità disabile. Estetica giuridica del dono e dello scambio. Bologna. EDB. Holler M.J., Leroch M.A. (2014). Theories of justice and empirical results. In Forte, Mudambi, Navarra (2014), 143-159. Holmes S., Sunstein C. (2013). The cost of rights. Why liberty depends on taxes. New York-London, Norton&Company. Honneth A. (2009). Fatal profundity. Die Zeit, 24 September, 2009. Engl. Transl. in: http://www.cshingleton.com/2010/02/axel-honneth-against-sloterdijk-fatal.html. Kelsen H. (1967). Pure Theory of Law. University of California Press, California. Kimlika W. (2002). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Second Edition. Oxford University Press. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. Chichester: John Wiley. McGee R.W. (2004). The Philosophy of Taxation and Public Finance. Massachussets: Kluwer. Mauss M. (1990[1923-24]). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Milgate M., Stimson S.C. (2008). Brief lives: economic life and political life in the history of economic thought. Public Choice, 137, 491–505. Mises L. von (1949). Human Action. A treatise on Economics. San Francisco: Fox and Wilkes. Miyazaki H. (2004). The Method of Hope: Anthropology, Philosophy, and Fijian Knowledge. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Montedoro C., Marucci M., (a cura di) (2012). Il 5x1000 come strumento di partecipazione nel nuovo modello di welfare. Un’indagine sui contribuenti e sulle Associazioni di Promozione Sociale. ISFOL. (http://www.lavoro.gov.it/Priorita/Documents/isfol_5permille_strumentopartecipazione.pdf) Murphy L., Nagel T. (2002). The Myth of the Owernship, Tax and Justice. NY, Oxford University Press. Musgrave R. A. (1939). The Voluntary Exchange Theory of Public Economy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53, 2: 213-237. Musgrave R. A. (1981). Fiscal functions: Order and Politics. Acceptance Paper delivered on receiving the Frank E. Seidman Distinguished Award in Political Economy. Memphis, TN: P.K. Seidman Foundation (November). Nozick R. (1974). Anarchy State Utopia. New York, Basic Books. Nussbaum M. (2011). Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Harvard, Harvard University press. Ostrom E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. Ostrom E., Walker J. (Eds.) (2003). Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons for Experimental Research. Russell Sage Foundation. Ostrom E. (2010). Beyond Markets and States. Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review, 100, 641–672. Otsuka M. (2003). Libertarianism without inequality. Oxford, Oxford University press. Pulcini E. (2001). L’individuo senza passioni. Individualismo moderno e perdita del legame sociale. Torino, Bollati Boringhieri. Rawls J. (1972). The Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Repetti J.R., McDaniel P.R. (1993). Horizontal and Vertical Equity: The Musgrave/Kaplow Exchange. Florida Tax Review 1, 10: 607-622. Rothbard M. (2004). Power and market. Government and the economy. Ludwig von Mises Institute: Auburb, Alabama. Salin P. (1996 [1985]), L’arbitraire fiscal. Tr. it.: La tirannia fiscale. Macerata, Liberilibri. Schiavello A. (2010). Perché obbedire al diritto? La risposta convenzionalista e i suoi limiti. Pisa: ETS. Sen A.K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford, Oxford University press. Sen A.K. (2009). The idea of justice. London, Allen Lane. Sequeri (1999). Dono verticale e orizzontale: fra teologia, filosofia e antropologia. In Il dono tra etica e scienze sociali, ed. by G. Gasparini, Roma, Edizioni Lavoro, 111-17. Silvestri P. (2008). Il liberalismo di Luigi Einaudi o del Buongoverno. Rubbettino: Soveria Mannelli. Silvestri P. (2010). Veritas, Auctoritas, Lex. Scienza economica e sfera pubblica: sulla normatività del Terzo. Il pensiero economico italiano, 2, 37-65. Silvestri P. (2012a). The ideal of good government in Luigi Einaudi’s Thought and Life: Between Law and Freedom. In: P. Silvestri, P. Heritier (Eds.) Good government, Governance and Human Complexity. Luigi Einaudi’s Legacy and Contemporary Society, Leo Olschki, Firenze, 55-95. Silvestri P. (2012b). After-word. Which (good-bad) man? For which (good-bad) polity?. In: P. Heritier, P. Silvestri (eds.), Good government, Governance and Human Complexity. Luigi Einaudi’s Legacy and Contemporary Society, Leo Olschki, Firenze, 313-332. Silvestri P. (2012c). Economia, diritto e politica nella filosofia di Croce. Tra finzioni, istituzioni e libertà. Torino, Giappichelli. Sloterdijk P. (2010). Die nehmende Hand und die gebende Seite. It. transl.: La mano che prende e la mano che dà, Raffaello Cortina editore 2012. Starobinski (1995 [1994]). Largesse. Edition de la Réunion des Musées nationaux. Paris 1994, It. transl. Einaudi 1995. Sugden R. (1990). Rules for choosing among public goods. A contractarian approach. Constitutional Political Economy, 1/2, 63-82. Supiot A. (2006 [2005]). Homo Juridicus, Edition du Seuil. It. transl.: Mondadori 2006. Titmuss R.M. (1970). The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: Allen and Unwin. Torgler B. (2007). Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing. Vanberg V.J. (1994). Rules and Choice in Economics. London: Routledge. Vanoni E. (1932). Natura del diritto di imposizione. Il tributo come fenomeno di scambio, in ID, Opere giuridiche, a cura di F. Forte e C. Longobardi, Milano 1961, Vol. I: 41-72. Wicksell K. (1896, 1958). Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen, Jena: Gustav Fischer (English trans.: A new principle of just taxation, in R. Musgrave and A. T. Peacock (eds), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 72–118. Zizek S. (2012). We don't want the charity of rich capitalists, in: http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/2012/08/14/3567719.htm. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/67644 |