Da Rocha Alvarez, Jose Maria and Sempere, Jaume (2015): ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does full tradability increase inequality?
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_67921.pdf Download (405kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Concerns over the re-distributive effects of individual transferable quotas (ITQ's) have led to restrictions on their tradability. We consider a general equilibrium model with firm dynamics to evaluate the redistributive impact of changing the tradability of ITQs. A change in tradability would happen, for example, if permits are allowed to be traded as a separate asset from ownership of an active firm. If the property right is associated with ownership of an active firm, the permit can be leased in each period but it is not possible to exit the industry and keep the right. However, allowing the permits to be traded as a separate asset has two effects. First, it leads to a greater concentration of production in the industry. Second, it directly converts a non-tradable asset into a tradable one, and this is equivalent to giving a lump sum transfer to all firms. The first effect implies a concentration in revenues, while the second implies a redistribution of wealth. We calibrate our model to match the observed increase in revenue inequality in the Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish) U.S. Fishery. We show that although observed revenue inequality --measured by the Gini coefficient-- increases by 12%, wealth inequality is reduced by 40%.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does full tradability increase inequality? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | ITQ, wealth distribution, firm dynamics, inequality, permit markets |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 67921 |
Depositing User: | Dr Jose Maria Da Rocha Alvarez |
Date Deposited: | 17 Nov 2015 13:58 |
Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2019 22:48 |
References: | Anderson, T., Arnason, R., and Libecap, G. (2011). Efficiency advantages of grandfathering in rights-based fisheries management. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 3:159–79. Arnason, R. (2002). A review of international experiences with ITQs: an annex to Future options for UK fish quota management. CEMARE. Brandt, S. (2005). The equity debate: distributional impacts of individual transferable quotas. Ocean and Coastal Management, 48:15–30. Brandt, S. (2007). Evaluating tradable property rights for natural resources: Therole of strategic entry and exit. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63:158–176. Da-Rocha, J. M. and Pujolas, P. (2011a). Policy distortions and agregate productivity: The role of idiosyncratic shocks. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 11(1). Da-Rocha, J. M. and Pujolas, P. (2011b). Vessel dynamics, itq’s and endogenous vessels distributions. in J. Simmons et al (ed), Impact Assessment of multi-annual plans for Southern hake, angler fish and Nephrops (STECF-11-06). EUR – Scientific and Technical Research series – ISSN 1831-9424 (online), ISSN 1018-5593 (print). Da-Rocha, J. M., Pujolas, P., and Sempere, J. (2014a). Eficiencia y equilibrio en un modelo de formación de derechos de propiedad. Trimestre Econ ́omico, 323(3):579–593. Da-Rocha, J.-M., Tavares, M. M., and Restuccia, D. (2014b). Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with endogenous establishment-level productivity. Working Paper, University of Toronto. Da-Rocha, J.-M., Tavares, M. M., and Restuccia, D. (2015). Firing costs, misallocation, and aggregate productivity. Working Paper, University of Toronto. Diaz-Gimenez, J., Glover, A., and Rios-Rull, J. (2011). Facts on the distributions of earnings, income, and wealth in the united states: 2007 update. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 34(1):2–31. Dixit, A. K. and Pindyck, R. S. (1984). Uncertainty in the theory of renewable resource markets. Review of Economic Studies, 51(2):289–303. Dixit, A. K. and Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton,NJ. Fox, K. J., Grafton, R., Kirkley, J., and Squires, D. (2003). Property rights in a fishery: Regulatory change and firm performancee. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46:156–177. Gabaix, X. (2009). Power laws in economics and finance. Annual Reviews of Economics, page 255–93. Gourio, F. and Roys, N. (2014). Size-dependent regulations, firm size distribution, and reallocation. Quantitative Economics, 5:377–416. Grafton, R., Squires, D., and Fox, K. (2000). Private property and economic efficiency: a study of a common-pool resource. Journal of Law and Economics, 42:679–713. Grainger, C. and Costello, C. (2014). Capitalizing property rights insecurity in natural resource asset. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 67:224–240. Grainger, C. and Costello, C. (2015). The value of secure property rights: Evidence from global fisheries. Working Paper 17019, NBER Working Papers Series. Hopenhayn, H. (1992). Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica, 60:1127–50. Hopenhayn, H. and Rogerson, R. (1993). Job turnover and policy evaluation: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 101(5):915-38. Impullitti, G., Irrazabal, A., and Opromolla, L. (2013). A theory of entry into and exit from export markets. Journal of International Economics, 90:75–90. Joskow, P. and Schmalensee, R. (1998). The political economy of market-based environmental policy: The u. s. acid rain program. Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1):37–83. Kitts, A., Bing-Sawyer, E., Walden, J., Demarest, C., McPherson, M., Christman, P., Stein- back, S., J., J. O., and Clay, P. (2011). Final Report on the Performance of the Northeast Multispecies (Groundfish) Fishery. US Dept Commer, Northeast Fish Scient. Kompas, T. and Nu, C. (2005). Efficiency gains and cost reductions from individual transferable quotas: A stochastic cost frontier for the australian south east fishery. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23:285–307. Libecap, G. (2007). Assigning property rights in the common pool: Implications of the preva- lence of first-possession rules for itqs in fisheries. Marine Resource Economics, 22:407–423. Luttmer, E. (2007). Selection, growth, and the size distribution of firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3):1103–1144. Luttmer, E. (2010). Models of growth and firm heterogeneity. Annual Reviews of Economics, pages 547–76. Luttmer, E. (2011). On the mechanics of firm growth. Review of Economic Studies, 78(3):1042–1068. Luttmer, E. (2012). Technology diffusion and growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 147:602– 622. Mangel, M. (2006). The Theoretical Biologists Toolbox. Quantitative Methods for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Merton, R. (1975). An asymptotic theory of growth under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 42(3):289–303. Olson, J. (2011). Understanding and contextualizing social impacts from the privatization of fisheries: An overview. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54:353-363. Restuccia, D. and Rogerson, R. (2008). Policy distortions and agrégate productivity with heterogeneous establishments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4):707-720. Weninger, Q. and Just, R. (2002). Firm dynamics with tradable output prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84:562–584. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/67921 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does full tradability increase inequality? (deposited 14 Aug 2015 15:10)
- ITQs, Firm Dynamics and Wealth Distribution: Does full tradability increase inequality? (deposited 17 Nov 2015 13:58) [Currently Displayed]