Koumtingué, Nelnan (2010): Proliferation of preferential trade agreements: an empirical analysis.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_68917.pdf Download (332kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The creation of a preferential trade area (PTA) or the deepening of an existing one can affect adversely excluded countries and induce them to join or create a new PTA (Baldwin, 1993). One such adverse effect is trade diversion, the shift of imports from countries outside the preferential trade area toward member countries. This paper investigates empirically whether countries whose exports are more likely to suffer from trade diversion exhibit a higher likelihood of forming a PTA. I derive a measure of the potential of trade diversion from the trade complementarity index (Michaely (1962)) and estimate a dynamic Probit model of new PTAs formed between 1961 and 2005. The results show that countries facing a larger potential of trade diversion are more likely to form a PTA in the future. The results also support the natural trading partner hypothesis according to which preferential trade agreements are more likely to be formed among countries that are predisposed to trade a lot.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Proliferation of preferential trade agreements: an empirical analysis |
English Title: | Proliferation of preferential trade agreements: an empirical analysis |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Preferential Trade Agreements, domino theory, trade diversion, trade complementarity index, Probit. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C11 - Bayesian Analysis: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C25 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions ; Probabilities F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration |
Item ID: | 68917 |
Depositing User: | Nelnan Koumtingue |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jan 2016 05:25 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 10:13 |
References: | Scott L. Baier and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand. Economic determinants of free trade agreements. Journal of International Economics, 64(1):29{63, October 2004. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v64y2004i1p29-63.html. Scott L. Baier and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand. Database of economic integration agreements, April 2009. Richard Baldwin. A domino theory of regionalism. Working Paper 4465, National Bureau of Economic Research, September 1993. URL http://www.nber.org/papers/w4465. Richard Baldwin. Expanding European Regionalism: The EU's New Members, chapter A Domino Theory of Regionalism, pages 25{53. Cambridge University Press, 1995. Richard Baldwin. Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trade Arrangements, chapter A Domino Theory of Regionalism, pages 479{502. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999. Richard Baldwin and Dany Jaimovich. Are free trade agreements contagious? Working Paper 16084, National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2010. URL http://www.nber.org/papers/ w16084. Richard Baldwin and Roland Rieder. A test of endogenous trade bloc formation theory on eu data. CEPR Discussion Papers 6389, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers, July 2007. URL http://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/6389.html. Eugene Beaulieu. The stolper-samuelson theorem faces congress. Review of International Economics, 10(2):343{60, May 2002. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/ v10y2002i2p343-60.html. Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Peter Egger, and Mario Larch. Economic determinants of the timing of preferential trade agreement formations and enlargements. July 2010. Jagdish N. Bhagwati. Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008. Jo-Ann Crawford and Roberto V. Fiorentino. The changing landscape of regional trade agreements. Discussion paper No 8, World Trade Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. Peter Egger and Mario Larch. Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Economics, 76(2):384{399, December 2008. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v76y2008i2p384-399.html. Robert C. Feenstra, Robert E. Lipsey, Haiyan Deng, Alyson C. Ma, and Hengyong Mo. World trade flows: 1962-2000. Working Paper 11040, National Bureau of Economic Research, January 2005. Jeffrey Frankel, Ernesto Stein, and Shang-jin Wei. Trading blocs and the americas: The natural, the unnatural, and the super-natural. Journal of Development Economics, 47(1):61{95, June 1995. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/deveco/v47y1995i1p61-95.html. Jeffrey A. Frankel. Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics, october 1997. Jeffrey A. Frankel and Shang-JinWei. Can regional blocs be a stepping stone to global free trade? a political economy analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 5(4):339 { 347, 1996. ISSN 1059-0560. doi: DOI:10.1016/S1059-0560(96)90021-0. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W4V-45NP3MS-9/2/1eab604c19af3aef55978536c87f0864. Carsten Kowalczyk and Raymond Riezman. Free trade: what are the terms-of-trade ffects? Economic Theory, 41(1):147{161, October 2009. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joecth/ v41y2009i1p147-161.html. Anne O. Krueger. Are preferential trading arrangements trade-liberalizing or protectionist? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4):105{124, Fall 1999. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/jecper/v13y1999i4p105-124.html. Paul Krugman. The move toward free trade zones. Economic Review, (Nov):5{25, 1991. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedker/y1991inovp5-25nv.76no.6.html. Philip I Levy. A political-economic analysis of free-trade agreements. American Economic Review, 87(4):506{19, September 1997. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/ v87y1997i4p506-19.html. Nuno Limao. Preferential trade agreements as stumbling blocks for multilateral trade liberalization: Evidence for the united states. The American Economic Review, 96(3):pp. 896{914, 2006. ISSN 00028282. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/30034078. Christopher S. Magee. Endogenous preferential trade agreements: An empirical analysis. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 0(1), 2003. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bejeap/vcontributions.2y2003i1n15.html. Christopher S.P. Magee. New measures of trade creation and trade diversion. Journal of International Economics, 75(2):349{362, July 2008. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/inecon/v75y2008i2p349-362.html. Michael Michaely. Multilateral balancing in international trade. The American Economic Review, 52(4):pp. 685{702, 1962. ISSN 00028282. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1808983. Andre Sapir. Domino effects in western european regional trade, 1960-1992. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(2):377{388, June 2001. URL http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/poleco/v17y2001i2p377-388.html. Jacob Viner. The Customs Union Issue. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York, 1950. Michael D. Ward and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. Spatial regression models. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA, 2008. L. Alan Winters and Won Chang. Regional integration and import prices: an empirical investigation. Journal of International Economics, 51(2):363 { 377, 2000. ISSN 0022-1996. doi: DOI:10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00010-0. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/B6V6D-409VNV4-7/2/8ade35f602e3a52071f5c9a378780d8d. P. Wonnacott and M. Lutz. Free Trade Areas and U.S. Trade Policy, chapter Is There a Case for Free Trade Areas. Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C., 1989. World Bank. Trade blocs. Oxford University Press, 2000. World Bank. World development indicators 2009, 2009. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/68917 |