Billette de Villemeur, Etienne and Ruble, Richard and Versaevel, Bruno (2015): On the timing of innovation and imitation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_69161.pdf Download (539kB) | Preview |
Abstract
When fixed costs of innovation and imitation differ, strategic competition between duopolists involves either preemption or attrition, the latter being likelier with high uncertainty. We show that industry value is maximized when firms neither stall nor hasten entry, whereas social welfare has local optima in both the attrition and preemption ranges. The social optimum implies a positive imitation cost, and with static business-stealing and sufficient discounting it involves preemption. Finally we endogenize entry barriers and discuss contracting, showing that firms are more likely to rely on secrecy and patents at low imitation costs and that simple licensing schemes are welfare improving.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On the timing of innovation and imitation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Dynamic oligopoly; Knowledge spillover; Real options |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G31 - Capital Budgeting ; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies ; Capacity L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 69161 |
Depositing User: | Etienne Billette de Villemeur |
Date Deposited: | 03 Feb 2016 05:43 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 17:18 |
References: | Anderson S, Renault R (2003) Efficiency and surplus bounds in Cournot competition, Journal of Economic Theory 113(2):253-264. Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, NBER ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press):609-626. Azevedo A, Paxson D (2014) Developing real option game models, European Journal of Operational Research 237(3):909-920. Benoit J-P (1985) Innovation and imitation in a duopoly, Review of Economic Studies 52:99-106. Billette de Villemeur E, Ruble R, Versaevel B (2014) Investment timing and vertical relationships, International Journal of Industrial Organization 33:110-123. Boyer M, Lasserre P, Moreaux M (2012) A dynamic duopoly investment game without commitment under uncertain market expansion, International Journal of Industrial Organization 30(6):663-681. Chevalier-Roignant B, Trigeorgis L (2011) Competitive Strategy: Options and Games, (Cambridge: MIT Press). Cohen W. M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh J. P. (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not), NBER Working Paper No. 7552. Décamps J-P, Mariotti T (2004) Investment timing and learning externalities, Journal of Economic Theory 118:80-102. Denicolò V (2000) Two-stage patent races and patent policy, RAND Journal of Economics 31(3):488-501. Dixit A, Pindyck R (1994) Investment under Uncertainty, (Princeton: Princeton University Press). Femminis G, Martini G (2011) Irreversible investment and R&D spillovers in a dynamic duopoly, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35(7):1061-1090. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1985) Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology, Review of Economic Studies 52(3):383-401. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1987) Understanding rent dissipation: On the use of game theory in industrial organization, American Economic Review 77(2):176-183. Gallini N (1992) Patent policy and costly imitation, RAND Journal of Economics 23(1):52-63. Green J, Scotchmer S (1995) On the division of profit in sequential innovation, RAND Journal of Economics 26(1):20-33. Guey Chuen P, Huan-Yao L, Yee-Shin L, Kulkanya C (2011) Dengue vaccines: challenge and confrontation, World Journal of Vaccines 1:109-130. Hendricks K, Weiss A, Wilson C (1988) The war of attrition in continuous time with complete information, International Economic Review 29(4):663-680. Henry E, Ruiz-Aliseda, F (2015) Keeping secrets: the economics of access deterrence, mimeo. Hoppe H. (2000) Second-mover advantages in the strategic adoption of new technology under uncertainty, International Journal of Industrial Organization 18:315-338. Huisman K, Kort P (2004) Strategic technology adoption taking into account future technological improvements: A real options approach, European Journal of Operational Research 159(3):705-728. Katz M, Shapiro C (1987) R and D rivalry with licensing or imitation, American Economic Review 77(3):402-420. Lanjouw J (1998) The introduction of pharmaceutical product patents in India: 'Heartless exploitation of the poor and suffering' ?, NBER Working Paper No. 6366. Mankiw G, Whinston M (1986) Free entry and social inefficiency, RAND Journal of Economics 17(1):48-58. Mansfield E (1985) How rapidly does new industrial technology leakout?, Journal of Industrial Economics 34(2):217-223. Mansfield E, Schwartz M, Wagner S (1981) Imitation costs and patents: An empirical study, The Economic Journal 91(364):907-918. Mason R, Weeds H (2010) Investment, uncertainty, and preemption, International Journal of Industrial Organization 28(3):278-287. Mukherjee A, Pennings E (2004) Imitation, patent protection, and welfare, Oxford Economic Papers 56(4):715-733. Pawlina G, Kort P (2006) Real options in an asymmetric duopoly: who benefits from your competitive disadvantage?, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 15(1):1-35. Reinganum J (1981) On the diffusion of a new technology: a game theoretic approach, Review of Economic Studies 48(3):395-405. Samuelson P, Scotchmer S (2002) The law and economics of reverse engineering, Yale Law Journal 111:1575-1663. Scherer F, Watal J (2002) Post-TRIPS options for access to patented medicines in developing countries, Journal of International Economic Law 5(4):913-939. Steg J-H (2015) Symmetric equilibria in stochastic timing games, working paper 543, Center for Mathematical Economics, University of Bielefield. Thijssen J (2013) Game theoretic real options and competition risk, in: Bensoussan A, Peng S, Sung J (eds.), Real Options, Ambiguity, Risk and Insurance (Amsterdam: IOS Press). Thijssen J, Huisman K, Kort P (2006) The effects of information on strategic investment and welfare, Economic Theory 28(2):399-424. Thijssen J, Huisman K, Kort P (2012) Symmetric equilibrium strategies in game theoretic real option models, Journal of Mathematical Economics 48(4):219-225. Wilson P (2010) Giving developing countries the best shot: An overview of vaccine access and R&D, Oxfam International, 28 pages. Weeds H (2002) Strategic delay in a real options model of R&D competition, Review of Economic Studies 69(3):729-747. World Health Organization (2011) Increasing access to vaccines through technology transfer and local production, 34 pp. (available at http://www.who.int/phi/publications/local_production_vaccines/en/, accessed 15/7/2015). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/69161 |