Dogaru, Vasile (2007): Trade Costs Algorithm in Manoilescu Generalised Scheme. Published in: ANNALS of the ORADEA UNIVERSITY, Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering , Vol. 1, No. Volume VI (XVI) (May 2007): pp. 2558-2571.
Download (154kB) | Preview
The study of the comparative advantage’s scheme, using the modified prices because of the trade costs in terms of a real two product barter, brings us on a “previous” position towards the merchandise exchange using the currency. In this new algorithm of scheme, the remarks include in the formal analytical plan the prices’ increase cases, determined by the tariff and non-tariff measures and also by the reduction ones through subventions or other similar measures of these. Through the national/regional existence of some of these measures (Hagen, 1958) is supposed to be a sustainer of the optimum economic behavior (more efficient) of the exchange agents, found in a certain economic space and time, and also in an economic environment expected due to the introduction of this kind of economic and financial instruments. The observation of the way how the trade costs influence, comprehended in the widest meaning possible, assures the partial observation of the national interest’s interference with the individual one through the legal and economical norms, necessary to be sent in the hierarchy’s synchronize (similar and simultaneous) of the products over the comparative advantage measured through gains from trade with the established one according to the efficiency. The effects determined by the efficiency’s modification – as it will be deducted in the second stage of Manoilescu generalized scheme – are included in the comparative advantage’s size. The trade costs’ case represents in a certain way the repetition of the one of the same initial internal and international prices’ usage in a barter exchange. The main remark is that now a higher consumption of resources takes place because of the products’ transfer to and from far economic areas and also in connection with some national custom house’s pass beyond which other legal and economic standards, usually, are used.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Trade Costs Algorithm in Manoilescu Generalised Scheme|
|Keywords:||comparative advantage, gains from trade, Manoilescu generalized scheme, entropy law, resources saving|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology
|Depositing User:||Vasile DOGARU|
|Date Deposited:||01. Feb 2008 07:31|
|Last Modified:||18. Feb 2013 12:24|
Croitoru, Lucian, Russu Corneliu, Tarhoaca, Cornel, Van Zon, Hans (EU Advisor). 2000. Romania’s Industrial Policy in Light of the EU Accession, European Institute of Romania, Bucharest, 2002. Dogaru, Vasile. 2000. The International Trade’s Theoretical Scheme. Manoilescu Generalized Formula, “The Romanian Statistic Magazine”, July 2000, pp. 48-65. Dogaru, Vasile, 2003. The Comparative Advantage in Domestic Exchanges and the Frontier of Production Possibilities, “Romanian Statistics Magazine”, No. 4, pp. 66-83. Dogaru, Vasile, 2005. Comparative Advantage in Manoilescu Generalized Scheme, “Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting”, no. 3/2005. Dogaru, Vasile. 2006. The comparative advantage principle – between general validity and his demythification, Probleme economice (Economic Issues), no. 229-230, The National Economic Research Institute, Romanian Academy, 2006. Georgescu-Roegen Nicholas. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Politica Publishing House, Bucharest, 1979. Hagen, Everett E. 1958. An Economic Justification of Protection, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 72(4), pp. 496-514. Harrigan, James, Evans, Carolyn L, Distance, Time, and Specialization. 2003. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138, 2003, Working Paper 9729. Kravis Irving B, Kenessey, Zoltan, Heston, Alan, Summers, Robert (KKHS). 1975. A System of International Comparisons of Gross Product and Purchasing Power, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1975. Korten, David C. 1995. The Corporations Rule the World, Editura Samizdat, Bucharest. Manoilescu, Mihail. 1937. The National Productive Forces and the External Trade , Editura Stiintifica si Enciclopedica, Bucharest, 1986. Palgrave, The New. A Dictionary of Economics, Vol I-IV (PAL), Eatwell, J. and others (eds.), 1988, The Macmillan Press Limited, London, 1998. Porter, Michael. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York, 1990. Ricardo, David, Selected Works. 1817. Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest, 1959. Triplett, Jack E.2004. Handbook on Hedonic Indexes and Quality Adjustments in Price Indexes: Special Application to Information Technology Products, Statistical Analysis of Science, Technology and Industry, Organization for Economic Co-operation an Development, Paris, 2004, DSTI/DOC (2004)9.