Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Centralized vs. Decentralized Institutions for Expert Testimony

Kim, Chulyoung (2015): Centralized vs. Decentralized Institutions for Expert Testimony.

[img]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_69618.pdf

Download (371kB) | Preview

Abstract

The legal community has been debating the question of who should select and provide expert witnesses at trial: the litigant or the judge? Using a persuasion-game framework, I show that there is a trade-off. On the one hand, the litigant is willing to consult an expert even when the judge is reluctant to appoint her own experts due to high costs. On the other hand, given the same amount of expert advice, the judge can make a more accurate decision when using a court-appointed expert's advice at trial. I show that the cost of expert advice is an important factor in this trade-off and, therefore, in the argument for the reform toward a centralized system for expert witnesses.

UB_LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.