Technology Shock and the Business Cycle in the G7 Countries: A Structural Vector Error Correction Model

Mukantabana, Athanasie and Habimana, Olivier (2015): Technology Shock and the Business Cycle in the G7 Countries: A Structural Vector Error Correction Model.

Abstract

This paper investigates the importance of technology shock in explaining fluctuations over business cycles and its contractionary effects. Applying the SVEC model on quarterly data of G7 countries and accounting for long cycles in hours worked, there is evidence of a decline in employment as measured by hours worked and investment following a positive technology shock. Hours worked show a persistent decline in France and UK, and this lasts for seven years in Italy, three years in Japan, two years in the USA and Canada; and one year in Germany. However, our findings suggest that technology shocks may play only a limited role in deriving the business cycles in the G7 countries; for they only account for under 30 percent of the business cycle variation in hours and investment, under 35 percent of the business cycle variation in consumption, and under 50 percent of the business cycle variation in output of most of the G7 countries. Our findings do not support the conventional real business cycle interpretation; instead, they are consistent with the predictions of the sticky-price model.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Business cycle, G7, sticky-price model, SVEC, technology shock
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles

References

Basu, S. (1998). Technology and business cycles; how well do standard models explain the facts? Conference Series; Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, June: 207-269.

Basu, S., Fernald, JG. and Kimball, MS.(2006). Are Technology Improvements Contractionary? The American Economic Review 96(5): 1418-1448.

Blanchard, OJ. and Kahn, CM. (1980). The Solution of Linear Difference Models under Rational Expectations. Econometrica 48(5): 1305-1311.

Blanchard, OJ.(1989). A traditional interpretation of Macroeconomic fluctuations. The American Economic Review 79(5): 1146-1164.

Canova, F., Lopez-Salido, D. and Michelacci, C.(2010). The Effects of Technology Shocks on Hours and Output: A Robustness Analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics 25(5): 755-773.

Carmen, MR. and Vincent, RR.(1991). Output Fluctuations and Monetary Shocks: Evidence from Columbia. IMF Staff Papers,38(4).

Christiano, JL., Eichenbaum, M. and Vigfusson, R. (2003). How do Canadian hours worked respond to a technology shock? International Finance Discussion Papers, 774.

Engle, RF. and Granger, CWJ.(1987). Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica, 55(2): 251-276.

Francis, N. and Ramey, VA. (2005). Is the Technology-driven Real Business Cycle Hypothesis Dead? Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations Revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(8): 1379-1399.

Galí, J. (1999). Technology, Employment, and the Business Cycle: Do Technology Shocks Explain Aggregate Fluctuations? American Economic Review, 89(1), 249- 271.

Galí, J., and Rabanal, P. (2004). Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations: How Well Does the RBC Model Fit Postwar U.S. Data? NBER Macroeconomics Annual 20: 225-288.

Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3): 231–254.

Kawamoto, T. and Nakakuki, M.(2005). Purified Solow Residual in Japan’s manufacturing: Do Technology Improvements Reduce Factor Inputs? mimeo.

King, R., Plosser, C., Stock, J., Watson, M.(1991). Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations. American Economic Review 81: 819–840.

Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, PCB., Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the alternative of a Unit Root. Journal of Econometrics 54: 159-178.

Lindé, J. (2004). The effects of permanent technology shocks on labour productivity and hours in the RBC model. Sveriges Riksbank working paper, 161.

Mankiw, G.(1989). Real business cycles: a new Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(3): 79-90.

Miyagawa, T., Sakuragawa, Y., Miho, T.(2006). The impact of Technology shocks on Japanese business cycle. Japan and the World Economy 18(4): 401–417.

Prescott, EC.(1986). Theory Ahead of Business Cycle Measurement. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 10:9-22.

Shapiro, MS. and Watson, WC.(1988). Sources of Business Cycles Fluctuations. In Fischer, S.(ed.). 3: 111 – 156. NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Yale University: MIT Press.

Sims, RE.(2012). Taylor rules and technology shocks. Economics Letters 116(1): 92–95.

Smets, F. and Wouters, R. (2007). Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach. American Economic Review 97(3): 586-606.

Solow, RM. (1957). Technological Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics 39(3): 312-320.

Tancioni, M. and Giuli, F.(2012). Real rigidities, Productivity Improvements and Investment Dynamics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 36(1): 100-118.