Judge's Gate-Keeping Power and Deterrence of Negligent Acts: An Economic Analysis of Twombly and Iqbal

Kim, Chulyoung (2015): Judge's Gate-Keeping Power and Deterrence of Negligent Acts: An Economic Analysis of Twombly and Iqbal.

Abstract

Following its landmark decisions in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, the Supreme Court allows federal judges to dismiss cases when the plaintiff's allegations are conclusory or implausible, thereby increasing the judges' discretionary power in pleading stages of litigation. Using a stylized litigation model, I find the conditions under which the ruling improves upon litigation outcomes by simultaneously raising deterrence and reducing litigation costs and error costs. In particular, I demonstrate the ways in which the ruling's effect depends on the correlation between the potential injurers' primary behavior and the strength of cases filed at trial courts.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Twombly; Iqbal; deterrence; litigation costs; error costs; perfect Bayesian equilibrium
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design; K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K41 - Litigation Process

References

Anderson, M. and M. Huffman (2010): “Iqbal, Twombly, and the Expected Cost of False Positive Errors,” Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 20, 1–66.

Bone, R. G. (2003): Civil Procedure: The Economics of Civil Procedure, NY: Foundation Press.

Bone, R. G. (2010): “Plausibility Pleading Revisited and Revised: A Comment on Ashcroft v. Iqbal,” Notre Dame Law Review, 85, 849–886.

Campos, S. J., C. Cotton, and C. Li (2015): “Deterrence Effects under Twombly: On the Costs of Increasing Pleading Standards in Litigation,” Internatioinal Review of Law and Economics, 44, 61–71.

Cecil, J. S., G. W. Cort, M. S. Williams, and J. J. Bataillon (2011a): “Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim After Iqbal,” Federal Judicial Center.

Cecil, J. S., G. W. Cort, M. S. Williams, J. J. Bataillon, and J. G. Campbell (2011b): “Update on Resolution of Rule 12(b)(6) Motions Granted with Leave to Amend,” Federal Judicial Center.

Curry, J. L. and M. A. Ward (2013): “Are Twombly and Iqbal Affecting Where Plaintiffs File? A Study Comparing Removal Rates by State,” Texas Tech Law Review, 827–874.

Demougin, D. and C. Fluet (2006): “Preponderance of Evidence,” European Economic Review, 50, 963–976.

Demougin, D. and C. Fluet (2008): “Rules of Proof, Courts, and Incentives,” RAND Journal of Economics, 39, 20–40.

Dodson, S. (2013): New Pleading in the Twenty-first Century: Slamming the Federal Court- house Doors?, Oxford University Press.

Eisenberg, T. and K. M. Clermont (2014): “Plaintiphobia in the Supreme Court,” Cornell Law Review, 100, 193–212.

Gelbach, J. B. (2012): “Locking the Doors to Discovery? Assessing the Effects of Twombly and Iqbal on Access to Discovery,” Yale Law Journal, 121, 2270–2346.

Guinther, J. (1988): The Jury in America, New York: Facts on File Publications.

Hubbard, W. H. J. (2013): “Testing for Change in Procedural Standards, with Application to Bell Atlantic v. Twombly,” Journal of Legal Studies, 42, 35–68.

Hubbard, W. H. J. (2016): “A Fresh Look at Plausibility Pleading,” University of Chicago Law Review, 83, forthcoming.

Hylton, K. N. (2008): “When Should a Case Be Dismissed? The Economics of Pleading and Summary Judgment Standards,” Supreme Court Economic Review, 16, 39–66.

Issacharoff, S. and G. Miller (2013): “An Information-Forcing Approach to the Motion to Dismiss,” Journal of Legal Analysis, 5, 437–465.

Kalven, H. and H. Zeisel (1966): The American Jury, New York: Little, Brown.

Kaplow, L. (1994): “The Value of Accuracy in Adjudication: An Economics Analysis,” Journal of Legal Studies, 23, 307–401.

Kaplow, L. (2011): “On the Optimal Burden of Proof,” Journal of Political Economy, 119, 1104– 1140.

Kaplow, L. (2013): “Multistage Adjudication,” Harvard Law Review, 126, 1179–1298.

Kaplow, L. and S. Shavell (1994): “Accuracy in the Determination of Liability,” Journal of Law and Economics, 37, 1–15.

Kilaru, R. N. (2010): “The New Rule 12(b)(6): Twombly, Iqbal, and the Paradox of Pleading,” Stanford Law Review, 62, 905–930.

Klerman, D. (2015): “The Economics of Civil Procedure,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, forthcoming.

Kozel, R. J. and D. Rosenberg (2004): “Solving the Nuisance-Value Settlement Problem: Mandatory Summary Judgment,” Virginia Law Review, 90, 1849–1907.

Miller, A. R. (2010): “From Conley to Twombly to Iqbal: A Double Play on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” Duke Law Journal, 60, 1–130.

Persico, N. (2002): “Racial Profiling, Fairness, and Effectiveness of Policing,” American Economic Review, 92, 1472–1497.

Posner, R. A. (1973): “An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration,” Journal of Legal Studies, 399–458.

Posner, R. A. (1999): “An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence,” Stanford Law Review, 51, 1477–1546.

Reilly, G. (2015): “Linking Patent Reform and Civil Litigation Reform,” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, forthcoming.

Reinert, A. (2015): “Measuring the Impact of Plausibility Pleading,” Virginia Law Review, forthcoming.

Rosenberg, D. and S. Shavell (2006): “A Solution to the Problem of Nuisance Suits: The Option to Have the Court Bar Settlement,” International Review of Law and Economics, 26, 42–51.

Sanchirico, C. W. (2012): Procedural Law and Economics, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, second ed.

Sichelman, T. M. (2008): “Why Barring Settlement Bars Legitimate Suits,” Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 18, 57–94.

Simon, R. J. (1975): The Jury System in America: A Critical Overview, California: Sage Publications.

Spencer, A. B. (2013): “Pleading and Access to Civil Justice: A Response to Twiqbal Apologists,” UCLA Law Review, 60, 1710–1739.

Stone, M. P. and T. J. Miceli (2013): “The Impact of Frivolous Lawsuits on Deterrence: Do They Have Some Redeeming Value?” Journal of Law, Economics and Policy, 10, 301– 344.

Thompson, A. C. (1999): “Stopping the Usual Suspects: Race and the Fourth Amendment,” NYU Law Review, 74, 956–1013.