Musgrave, Ralph S. (2016): Taxpayers Subsidise Private Money Creation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70162.pdf Download (122kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Publicly created money, i.e. base money, costs much less to produce than privately created money because amongst other things private banks have to check up on the credit worthiness of borrowers before supplying them with money. In contrast governments do not need to do those checks when creating and spending base money into the economy. It might be claimed that the cost of private money creation is the cost of organising loans and hence that the cost of private money creation as such is not particularly high. That claim does not stand inspection.
Despite the high cost of private money, it nevertheless manages to drive public money to near extinction (except in the current very low interest scenario). Reason is that private banks can create and lend out money at below the going rate of interest because they are not burdened with one of the main costs normally involved in lending, namely earning money and abstaining from consumption (so that borrowers can consume.)
When an economy is at capacity, the result of that extra lending is inflationary, so government has to withdraw base money from the economy, i.e. rob taxpayers, in order to counteract the inflation, for example by cutting the deficit / raising the surplus or by raising interest rates. In short, private money printing is subsidised by taxpayers, and subsidies reduce GDP, unless there is a good reason for a subsidy.
The net result of letting private money displace base money is an artificially low rate of interest and an artificially high level of debt, plus GDP is reduced. Thus GDP would be increased if privately issued money was banned, though its complete elimination is not necessary.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Taxpayers Subsidise Private Money Creation. |
English Title: | Taxpayers Subsidise Private Money Creation. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | money; bank |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E41 - Demand for Money E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E42 - Monetary Systems ; Standards ; Regimes ; Government and the Monetary System ; Payment Systems E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies |
Item ID: | 70162 |
Depositing User: | Ralph Musgrave |
Date Deposited: | 21 Mar 2016 16:50 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 23:14 |
References: | FDIC. (2004). ‘FDIC Outlook.’ https://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/regional/ro20051q/na/2005spring_03.html Friedman, M. (1960). ‘ A Program for Monetary Stability.’ Fordham University Press. Huber, J. and Robertson, J. (2001). ‘Creating New Money.’ New Economics Foundation. http://www.jamesrobertson.com/book/creatingnewmoney.pdf McLeay M, Radia A, and Ryland Thomas, R. (2014). ‘Money Creation in the Modern Economy.’ Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 2014, Q1. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarterlybulletin/2014/qb14q1prereleasemoneycreation.pdf Selgin, G. (2012). ‘Is Fractional-Reserve Banking Inflationary?’ Capitalism Magazine. http://capitalismmagazine.com/2012/06/is-fractional-reserve-banking-inflationary/ St Louis Fed. (2016). ‘St Louis Adjusted Monetary Base.’ https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/AMBNS Wolf, M. (2014). ‘Warnings from Japan for the Eurozone Financial Times.’ 4th November. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70162 |