The Network of Subsidized and Spontaneous R&D Cooperation between Belgian and Foreign Firms, Research Institutes and universities: A Graph-theoretical Approach

Meeusen, Wim and Dumont, Michel (1998): The Network of Subsidized and Spontaneous R&D Cooperation between Belgian and Foreign Firms, Research Institutes and universities: A Graph-theoretical Approach.

Abstract

In this paper we present the preliminary results of a graphtheoretical analysis of the network of R&D co-operation between firms, research institutions and universities in Belgium within an international context.

The information contained in the available databases on international R&D co-operation in formal projects and less formal agreements (‘CORDIS’, EUREKA, MERIT-CATI) is combined with information on personal linkages ‘interlocking directorates’), so as to be able to differentiate between ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ R&D alliances between companies and other actors of the Belgian knowledge infrastructure (research institutes, universities and government agencies).

The proposed methodology stresses, in accordance with recent literature on innovation, the importance of R&D alliances for firms in order to benefit better from innovation opportunities, and for the economy as a whole in terms of the entailed activation of the process of knowledge and technology diffusion.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: R&D cooperation, Framework Programmes, alliances, graph theory
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy

References

BIDAULT, F. and A. FISCHER (1994), ‘Technology Transactions: networks over markets’, R&D Management, 24(4): 373-386.

CABO, P.G. (1997), The Knowledge Network. European Subsidized Research and Development Cooperation, Capell a/d Ijssel: Labyrint Publications.

CARACOSTAS, P. and L. SOETE (1997), ‘The Building of Cross-border Institutions in Europe: Towards a European System of Innovation?’, in C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation, London : Pinter, 395-419.

CARLSSON, B. and S.JACOBSSON (1997), ‘Diversity creation and technology systems: a technology policy perspective’, in : C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation, London : Pinter, 266-294.

CHENAIS, F. (1988), ‘Multinational enterprises and the international diffusion of technology’, in: G. Dosi a.o. (eds.), Technological Change and Economic Theory, London : Pinter Publ.

CORTESE, V., G.STEURS and K.KESTELOOT (1990), De Belgische Deelname aan de EG-onderzoeksprogramma’s, DPWB, Brussel.

DEBACKERE, K. and H.VERMEULEN (1997), ‘Een analyse van de betekenis van clusterbeleid ter stimulering van innovatie, met een toepassing op Vlaanderen’, DTEW Onderzoeksrapport 9714, KUL.

DUNNING, J. (1997), Reconfiguring the Boundaries of International Business Activity, paper presented at the International Seminar on the Changing Nature of the Firm, Stockholm, 19 February.

DUYSTERS, G. (1996), The Dynamics of Technical Innovation - The Evolution and Development of Information Technology, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. EC (1994), The European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 1994, EUR15897 EN.

ELAM, M. (1997), ‘National Imagination and systems of Innovation’, in: C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter, 157-173.

FREEMAN, L.C. (1978), ‘Centrality in social networks: a conceptual clarification’, Social Networks, 1: 215-239.

GEROSKI, P.A. ( 1992), ‘Vertical Relations between Firms and Industrial Policy’, The Economic Journal, 102(1): 138-147.

GRUPP, H. (1992), ‘Competitive advantage of EC nations as a function of their science and technology production ?’, in: A.F.J. van Raan a.o. (eds.), Science and Technology in a policy context, Leiden: DSWO Press, 327-355.

HÅKANSSON, H. (1989), Corporate Technological Behaviour: Cooperation and Networks, London: Routledge.

HAGEDOORN, J. (1990), ‘Samenwerking bij productie en innovatie’, Tijdschrift voor Politieke Economie, 13 (1): 17-39.

HAGEDOORN, J. and J.SCHAKENRAAD (1993), ‘A comparison of private and subsidized inter-firm linkages in the European information technology industry’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3): 373-390.

HAGEDOORN, J. (1995), ‘Strategic Technology Partnering during the 1980s: trends, networks and corporate patterns in non-core technologies’, Research Policy, 24: 207-231.

IMAI, K. and Y. BABA (1991), ‘Systemic Innovation and Cross Border Networks. Transcending Markets and Hierarchies to create a new Techno-economic System’, in: Technology and Productivity – The Challenge for Economic Policy, OECD, Paris, 389-405.

KATZ, M.L. (1986), ‘An analysis of cooperative research and development’, Rand Journal of Economics, 17(4).

KLEINKNECHT, A. and J.O.N.REIJNEN (1991), ‘Why do firms cooperate in R&D? An empirical study’, Research Policy, 21: 347-360.

LICHTENBERG, F. (1996), ‘The European Strategic Program for Research in Information technologies (ESPRIT): An Ex-Post Analysis’, presented at the CEPR/WZB Conference “Does Europe Have an Industrial Policy ?”, Berlin, 19-20 April.

MEEUSEN, W. and L. CUYVERS (1985), ‘The Interaction between Interlocking Directorships and the Economic Behaviour of Companies’, in: F.N. Stokman, R. Ziegler and J. Scott (eds.), Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Countries, Cambridge, UK, Polity Press, 45-72.

MEEUSEN, W. and M.DUMONT, ‘Some results on the graph-theoretical identification of micro-clusters in the Belgian National Innovation System’, presented at the OECD/DSTI-workshop on ‘Cluster-analysis and Cluster-based Policies’, Amsterdam, October 1997.

MEYER-KRAHMER, F. (1997), ‘Science-based Technologies and Interdisciplinarity: Challenges for Firms and Policy’, in: C. Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter, 298-317.

OECD (1994), ‘National Innovation Systems: Work Plan for Pilot Case Studies’, Working Group on Innovation and Technology Policy, STI/STP/TIP(94)16/REV1.

OECD (1996), ‘National Innovation Systems: Report on Pilot Case Studies’, Working Group on Innovation and Technology Policy, DSTI/STP/TIP(96)4.

OUCHI, W.G., and M.KREMEN BOLTON (1988), ‘The Logic of Joint Research and Development’, California Management Review, 30(3): 9-33.

PAPANASTASSIOU, M. and R.PEARCE (1994), ‘The Internationalisation of Research and Development by Japanese Enterprises’, R&D Management, 24(2): 155-165.

PETRELLA, R. (1989), ‘Globalization of Technological Innovation’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1: 393-407.

PORTER, M.E. (1991), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.

SCHOTT, T. (1994), Collaboration in the Invention of technology: Globalization, Regions, and Centers’, Social Sciences Research, 23 : 23-56.

SPRENGER, C.J.A. and F.N.STOKMAN (1989), GRADAP User’s Manual, Groningen: Iec ProGamma.

STEURS, G. en K.KESTELOOT (1991), ‘Economische achtergronden van de Europese onderzoeksprogramma’s’, Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management, 36 : 155-178.

TEECE, D. (1992), ‘Competition, cooperation, and innovation’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18:1-25.

UNCTC (1995), World Investment Report 1995, New-York/Geneva: United Nations.

WALKER, G. (1988), ‘Network analysis for cooperative interfirm relationships’, in: F.J. Contractor and P. Lorange (eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington: Lexington Books.