Cordero, José Manuel and Pedraja-Chaparro, Francisco and Pisaflores, Elsa C. and Polo, Cristina (2016): Efficiency assessment of Portuguese municipalities using a conditional nonparametric approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70674.pdf Download (556kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Measuring local government efficiency is a complex task that has to take into account that they usually operate in a heterogeneous context. Therefore, the estimation of relative efficiency measures of their performance needs to account for the effect of contextual and exogenous variables on the production process. This should assure that the respective measures adequately reflect the portion of inefficiency that may be attributable to local authorities. In this paper, we apply time-dependent conditional frontier estimators to assess the performance of the 278 Portuguese mainland municipalities for the 2009-2014 period. By applying this nonparametric approach, we can avoid the strong assumptions on the specification of the estimated production function required by traditional two-stage methods. Furthermore, we examine the effect of contextual and exogenous variables on municipal efficiency levels and technological change. The results reveal that the recent local reforms introduced after the bailout agreement have slightly enhanced the performance of local authorities, but only for small and medium-sized municipalities.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Efficiency assessment of Portuguese municipalities using a conditional nonparametric approach |
English Title: | Efficiency assessment of Portuguese municipalities using a conditional nonparametric approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Efficiency, Local governments, Operational environment, Nonparametric estimation, Conditional approach |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H83 - Public Administration ; Public Sector Accounting and Audits |
Item ID: | 70674 |
Depositing User: | Mr Jose Manuel Cordero-Ferrera |
Date Deposited: | 14 Apr 2016 07:15 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 13:12 |
References: | Afonso, A., & Fernandes, S. (2006). Measuring local government spending efficiency: evidence for the Lisbon region. Regional Studies, 40(1), 39-53. Afonso, A., & Fernandes, S. (2008). Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 1946-1979. Athanassopoulos, A., Triantis, K. (1998). Assessing aggregate cost efficiency and the related policy implications for Greek local municipalities. INFOR 36 (3), 66–83. Badin, L., Daraio, C. (2011): Explaining Efficiency in Nonparametric Frontier Models. Recent developments in statistical inference, in Van Keilegom, I., Wilson, P.W. (eds). Exploring research frontiers in contemporary statistics and econometrics, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Badin, L., Daraio, C. & Simar, L. (2010): Optimal bandwidth selection for conditional efficiency measures: A data-driven approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 201, 633-640. Badin, L., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2012). How to measure the impact of environmental factors in a nonparametric production model. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(3), 818-833. Badin, L., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2014). Explaining inefficiency in nonparametric production models: the state of the art. Annals of Operations Research, 214(1), 5-30. Balaguer-Coll, M.T. & Prior, D. (2009). Short-and long-term evaluation of efficiency and quality. An application to Spanish municipalities. Applied Economics, 41(23), 2991-3002. Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2007). On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review, 51(2), 425-451. Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2010). Decentralization and efficiency of local government. The Annals of Regional science, 45(3), 571-601. Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2013). Output complexity, environmental conditions, and the efficiency of municipalities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 39(3), 303-324. Benito, B., Bastida, F., & García, J. A. (2010). Explaining differences in efficiency: an application to Spanish municipalities. Applied Economics, 42(4), 515-528. Bönisch, P., Haug, P., Illy, A., & Schreier, L. (2011). Municipality size and efficiency of local public services: Does size matter? (No. 2011, 18). IWH-Diskussionspapiere. Bosch, N., Espasa, M., & Mora, T. (2012). Citizen control and the efficiency of local public services. Environment and Planning-Part C, 30(2), 248. Bosch, N., Pedraja, F., & Suárez‐Pandiello, J. (2000). Measuring the efficiency of Spanish municipal refuse collection services. Local Government Studies,26(3), 71-90. Byrnes, J., Crase, L., Dollery, B., & Villano, R. (2010). The relative economic efficiency of urban water utilities in regional New South Wales and Victoria. Resource and Energy Economics, 32(3), 439-455. Carvalho, J.; Fernandes, M. J.; Camões, P. e Jorge, S. (2014). Anuário financeiro dos municípios portugueses 2013 (Financial Yearbook of Portuguese Municipalities 2013), Câmara dos Técnicos Oficiais de Contas (CTOC), Lisbon. Cazals, C., Florens, J.P., Simar, L. (2002): Nonparametric frontier estimation: A robust approach, Journal of Econometrics, 106, 1–25. Costa, H., Veiga, L. G., & Portela, M. (2015). Interactions in Local Governments' Spending Decisions: Evidence from Portugal. Regional Studies,49(9), 1441-1456. Cruz, N. F., & Marques, R. C. (2014). Revisiting the determinants of local government performance. Omega, 44, 91-103. Daraio, C. & Simar, L. (2005): Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: A probabilistic approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24 (1), 93–121. Daraio, C. & Simar, L. (2007a): Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis. Methodologies and Applications, Springer, New York. Daraio, C. & Simar, L. (2007b): Conditional nonparametric Frontier models for convex and non convex technologies: A unifying approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 13–32. Daraio, C. & Simar, L. (2014). Directional distances and their robust versions: Computational and testing issues. European Journal of Operational Research,237(1), 358-369. Daouia, A., Simar, L. (2007). Nonparametric efficiency analysis: a multivariate conditional quantile approach. Journal of Econometrics, 140(2), 375-400. De Borger, B., Kerstens, K., Moesen, W., & Vanneste, J. (1994). Explaining differences in productive efficiency: An application to Belgian municipalities. Public Choice, 80(3-4), 339-358. De Borger, B., & Kerstens, K. (1996a). Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(2), 145-170. De Borger, B., & Kerstens, K. (1996b). Radial and nonradial measures of technical efficiency: an empirical illustration for Belgian local governments using an FDH reference technology. Journal of Productivity analysis, 7(1), 41-62. De Witte, K., & Geys, B. (2013). Citizen coproduction and efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from local public libraries. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(3), 592-602. De Witte, K. & Kortelainen, M. (2013): What explains performance of students in a heterogeneous environment? Conditional efficiency estimation with continuous and discrete environmental variables, Applied Economics, 45(17), 2401–2412. Doumpos, M., & Cohen, S. (2014). Applying data envelopment analysis on accounting data to assess and optimize the efficiency of Greek local governments. Omega, 46, 74-85. Farrell, M.J. (1957): The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120 (Series A, Part 3), 253-281. García-Sánchez, I. M. (2009). Measuring the efficiency of local police force. European Journal of Law and Economics, 27(1), 59-77. Geys, B., Heinemann, F., & Kalb, A. (2010). Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: evidence from German municipalities. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(2), 265-278. Giménez, V. M., & Prior, D. (2007). Long‐and Short‐Term Cost Efficiency Frontier Evaluation: Evidence from Spanish Local Governments. Fiscal Studies, 28(1), 121-139. Hall, P., Racine, J.S., Li, Q. (2004). Cross-validation and the estimation of conditional probability densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99 (486), 1015–1026. Hayes, K. J., Razzolini, L., & Ross, L. B. (1998). Bureaucratic choice and nonoptimal provision of public goods: theory and evidence. Public Choice,94(1-2), 1-20. Jeong, S. O., Park, B. U., & Simar, L. (2010). Nonparametric conditional efficiency measures: asymptotic properties. Annals of Operations Research,173(1), 105-122. Jorge, S. M., Camões, P. J., Carvalho, J. B. D. C., & Fernandes, M. J. (2008). Portuguese Local Government relative efficiency: A DEA approach, unpublished paper. Kalb, A., Geys, B., & Heinemann, F. (2012). Value for money? German local government efficiency in a comparative perspective. Applied economics, 44(2), 201-218. Kneip, A., Simar, L. & Wilson, P. W. (2013): When bias kills the variance: Central limit theorems for DEA and FDH efficiency scores. Econometric Theory, 1-29. Kutlar, A., Bakirci, F., & Yüksel, F. (2012). An analysis on the economic effectiveness of municipalities in Turkey. African Journal of Marketing Management, 4(3), 80-98. Li, Q., Racine, J. S. (2007). Nonparametric econometrics: theory and practice. Princeton University Press. Li, D., Simar, L., & Zelenyuk, V. (2014). Generalized nonparametric smoothing with mixed discrete and continuous data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, forthcoming. Loikkanen, H. A., & Susiluoto, I. (2005). Cost efficiency of Finnish municipalities in basic service provision 1994–2002. Urban Public Economics Review, 4, 39-64. Mastromarco, C., & Simar, L. (2015). Effect of FDI and time on catching up: New insights from a conditional nonparametric frontier analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 30(5), 826-847. Nijkamp, P., & Suzuki, S. (2009): A generalized goals-achievement model in data envelopment analysis: an application to efficiency improvement in local government finance in Japan, Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(3), 249-274. Otsuka, A., Goto, M., & Sueyoshi, T. (2014). Cost-efficiency of Japanese local governments: effects of decentralization and regional integration. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 207-220. Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., González-Gómez, F., & Sáez-Fernández, F. J. (2009). Accounting for operating environments in measuring water utilities’ managerial efficiency. The Service Industries Journal, 29(6), 761-773. Prado, J. M., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2007). Efficiency evaluation in municipal services: an application to the street lighting service in Spain. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27(3), 149-162. Racine, J.S. (1997): Consistent significance testing for nonparametric regression, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15, 369–379. Racine, J.S., Li, Q. (2004): Nonparametric Estimation of Regression Functions with both categorical and continuous Data, Journal of Econometrics, 119 (1), 99-130. Ribeiro, N. A., & Jorge, S. (2015). Political-Ideological Circumstances and Local Authorities’ Debt: Evidence from Portuguese Municipalities. Contemporary Economics, 9(2), 155-170. Settimi, C., Vidoli, F., Fusco, E., & Ballanti, D. (2014). Estimating Technical Efficiency in the Italian Municipalities. Procedia Economics and Finance, 17, 131-137. Silva, J. (2008). Local governments in Portugal. Urban Public Economics Review, (9), 55. Silva, J., Carvalho, A., & Coimbra, M. L. (2011). Is There Yardstick Competition among Portuguese Municipalities?. Urban Public Economics Review, (15), 32. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of econometrics, 136(1), 31-64. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2011). Two-stage DEA: caveat emptor. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(2), 205-218. Sousa, M. D. C. S., & Ramos, F. S. (1999). Measuring public spending efficiency in Brazilian municipalities: a nonparametric approach. In Data envelopment analysis in the service sector (pp. 237-267). Deutscher Universitätsverlag. Sousa, M. D. C. S., & Stošić, B. (2005). Technical efficiency of the Brazilian municipalities: correcting nonparametric frontier measurements for outliers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24(2), 157-181. Stoker, G. (2011). Was local governance such a good idea? A global comparative perspective. Public administration, 89(1), 15-31. Storto, C. (2013). Evaluating technical efficiency of Italian major municipalities: a Data Envelopment Analysis model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 346-350. Teles, F. (2014). Local government and the bailout: Reform singularities in Portugal. European Urban and Regional Studies, 0969776413517249. Tzeremes, N. G. (2014). The effect of human capital on countries’ economic efficiency. Economics Letters, 124(1), 127-131. Van den Eeckaut, P., Tulkens, H., Jamar, M.-A. (1993). Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities. In: Fried, H., Lovell, C., e Schmidt, S. (Eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 300–334. Veiga, L. G., & Veiga, F. J. (2014). Determinants of Portuguese local governments’ indebtedness. NIPE Working Paper, 16/2014. Worthington, A. (2000). Cost Efficiency in Australian Local Government: a comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometric approaches. Financial Accounting and Management, 16 (3), 201–221. Worthington, A., & Dollery, B. (2000). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in local government. Local Government Studies,26(2), 23-52. Zafra, J.L. & Muñiz, M. (2010). Overcoming cost-inefficiencies within small municipalities: improve financial condition or reduce the quality of public services? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 609-629. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70674 |