K., Srinivasan and Raka, Sharan (2006): Organization of Indian Health Bureaucracy and its Delivery System. Published in: Productivity, A Quarterly Journal of the National Productivity Council, India , Vol. , Vol., No. January-March 2006, pp 477-486. (March 2006): pp. 477-486.
Download (176kB) | Preview
The aim of this paper is to probe into the structure and functioning of health bureaucracy in India with specific reference to rural health bureaucracy of Tamil Nadu State. bureaucracy is defined as "a hierarchical division of staff who act on formal assignments" - Gouldner(1954). This definition suggests five specific dimensions of bureaucracy namely (i) hierarchical structure (ii) nature of work and progress (iii) procedural devices (iv) decision making and (v) procedural bottlenecks have been considered in this order to understand the functioning of bureaucracy. These factors are particularly relevant to the understanding of bureaucratic functioning as the previous studies have indicated that the magnitude of these attributes varies from one organization to another (Hall, Peabody, Meyer) 1. The functional complexities of any bureaucratic system largely depend upon the combination of these attributes (Bennis). Health care delivery system is a system in which the services related to health care delivered to the target population. In Health care the higher-level officials do only planning while the local staff do implementation. In India including Tamil Nadu, the implementing agency of health care programmes is at block level known as Primary Health Centers (P.H.C.). In such a kind of setup, whether the centralised approach will be effective? Whether the mechanistic and vertical delivery system will achieve the health care to all sections of society? What are the merits and demerits of mechanistic model? The paper would like to address the above questions in the present context. It also would like to present the health delivery of Non Governmental Organisations. The nature of hierarchy plays an important role in health. The centralised control created problem in managing emergencies. It was also found that the lower level officials need to be part of the planning process as the policies have to be customised.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Organization of Indian Health Bureaucracy and its Delivery System|
|Keywords:||Health Administration, Bureaucracy, Health management, Structure, Organisation, Vertical, Horizontal, Organisational Development, Decision Making, Organisational Behaviour|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health|
|Depositing User:||Kannan Srinivasan|
|Date Deposited:||09. Feb 2008 10:49|
|Last Modified:||24. Feb 2013 19:34|
1. Allinson, W. Cristopher, Bureaucratic personality and organisation structure, Hants, Gower Publishing Company, 1984. 2. Anderson, Janes G, and Jay Stephen, Computers and clinical judgments, the role of physician networks, soc sci med, vol.20, no.10, 1985 3. Begur, James w, "A casual model of the health care system: A replication", J.of health and science behaviour, vol.18, 1977 Mar. 4. Bennis, W. and Shepard, H. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations 9:415-457. 5. Bennis, W.G. 1968. “Beyond Bureaucracy” Pp. 53-76 in Warren G. Bennis and Philip E. Slater. The Temporary Society. (eds.), New York: Harper and Row. 6. Вennis W. G. Changing Organizations. — In: Management of Change and Conflict, (eds.) Thomas, J M, and Bennis, W. G. Harmonds-woith, Penguin, 1972. 7. Blau, Peter M., The dynamics of bureaucracy, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1969. 8. Blau, P.M. and M.W. Meyer 1971 (2nd. ed.), Bureaucracy in Modern Society. New York: Random House. Meyer, M. W. and Associates. (1978). Environments and Organizations (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass). 9. Blau, Peter M., Orientation toward clients in a public welfare agency, from the book, Bureaucracy and the public, Ed. by Katz and Denet, New York, Basic Books Inc., Publishers, 1973. 10. Bose, Amita- Social impact on chronic diseases: A sociological study of Delhi publication. PhD thesis submitted at I.I.T Delhi. 11. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. 1961. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications. 12. Camic Charles, The of habit, AJS, Vol.91, No.5 1986. 13. Camp bell, James D, Mauksct Hans, Neikirk Helen J and Hosokama Michael CCollaborative practice and provider styles of delivering health care, soc sci med, vol.30, 1990. 14. Chan Ho, Suzanne, S.Y, Dietary beliefs in health and illness among a Soc.sci.med, Vol. 20, No.3, pp 223-320,1985. 15. Charmaz,Kathy, Discovering chronic illness using grounded, Soc sci med, Vol.30,1990. 16. Eisenstadt, S.N., Max Weber on Charisma and Institution Building, Chicago, the University of Chicago Press, 1968 17. Gouldner, A. W. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Glencoe, Ill.,, Free Press. 18. Hall, R. (1982) Organizations: Structure and Processes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall . 19. Hall. R. (1982) Organizations: Structure and Processes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 20. Harrison, I. Michael, Diagnosing organizations, California, SAGE Publications, 1987. 21. Heydebrand, Wolf, Hospital bureaucracy, New York, Dunellen Publishing Company Inc., 1973. 22. Jones, Michael Owen, Moore, Michael Dane, Synder, C.R., Inside organizations-Understanding the human dimension, California SAGE Publications, 1988. 23. Lindblom, C.E. (1968). The policy-making process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 24. Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan. (1977). “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology. 83(2):340-363. 25. Meyer, John W., Francisco O. Ramirez, Richard Rubinson, and John Boli-Bennett.(1977). The World Educational Revolution, 1950-1970. Sociology of Education, 50 (4): 242-258. 26. Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage). 27. Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., Strang, D., & Creighton, A. L. (1988). "Bureaucratization Without Centralization: Changes in the Organizational System of U.S. Public Education, 1940-80" (pp.139-167). In L.G. Zucker (Ed), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger). 28.Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Soysal, Y. N. (1992). World expansion of mass education, 1870-1980. Sociology of Education, 65 (April), pp. 128-149. 29. Nagendra, S.P., The concept of ritual in modern Sociological theory, New Delhi, the Academic Journals of India, 1971. 30. Negi, Usha, Folk and Modern Medicine in a Hill Village : A Study on Health Knowledge, Beliefs and Practices, Chandigarh, M.Phil Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Punjab University, 1985. 31.Opler, Morris, The cultural Definition of Illness in Village India, Human Organization, Vol.22(1963). 32. Peabody, Robert 1962 'Perceptions of organizational authority: A comparative analysis'. Administrative Science Quarterly 6/4: 463-482. 33. Thani, Nayagam, X.S., Tamil culture and civilization, readings: The classical period, Madras, ASIA Publishing House, 1970. 34. Government move to promote Indian Medicine, A Newspaper Report, New Delhi, The Times of India, dated Aug.7th, 1995.