Kaivanto, Kim and Zhang, Peng (2016): A resolution of emissions-estimate confusion for informing flight choice.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70923.pdf Download (196kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Air transport Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions estimates differ greatly, depending on the calculation method employed. Among the IPCC, ICAO, DEFRA, and BrighterPlanet calculation methods, the largest estimate may be up to 4.5 times larger than the smallest. Such heterogeneity -- and ambiguity over the true estimate -- confuses the consumer, undermining the credibility of emissions estimates in general. Consequently, GHG emissions estimates do not currently appear on the front page of flight search-engine results. Even where there are differences between alternative flights' emissions, this information is unavailable to consumers at the point of choice. When external considerations rule out alternative travel-modes, the relative ranking of flight options' GHG emissions is sufficient to inform consumers' decision making. Whereas widespread agreement on a gold standard remains elusive, the present study shows that the principal GHG emissions calculation methods produce consistent rankings within specific route-structure classes. Hence, for many consumers, the question of which calculation method to employ is largely irrelevant. But unless GHG emissions information is displayed at the point of decision, it cannot enter into consumers' decision making. A credible and ambiguity-free alternative would thus be to display GHG ranking information on the front page of flight search-engine results.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A resolution of emissions-estimate confusion for informing flight choice |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | greenhouse gas emissions; carbon footprint computation; scheduled passenger air transport; informed choice; decision making; behavior; policy |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming |
Item ID: | 70923 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Kim Kaivanto |
Date Deposited: | 26 Apr 2016 07:57 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:02 |
References: | Avineri, E., Waygood, E.O.D., 2013. Applying valence framing to enhance the effect of information on transport-related carbon dioxide emissions. Transp. Res. Part A 48, 31--48. Bonnini, S., Corain, L., Marozzi, M., Salmaso, L., 2014. Nonparametric Hypothesis Testing: Rank and Permutation Methods with Applications in R. John Wiley \& Sons, Chichester, UK. DEFRA, 2011. Guidelines to Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Conversion Gactors for Company Reporting. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK. van Dorland, N., van der Zwan, F., Ghijs, S., Santema, S., Curran, R., 2009. Aviation and the environment: Rating airlines on their CO$_2$ efficiency. Papers Am. Inst. Aer. Astron. 3, 1449--1464. Eijgelaar, E., Miedema, W., Bongaerts, R., Peeters, P., 2013. Overview of carbon calculators and the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions in tourism. CARMATOP Research Note to Working Package 1, NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, Breda, The Netherlands. EMEP/EEA, 2009. Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook. European Environment Agency, Luxembourg. Gaker, D., Zheng, Y., Walker, J., 2010. Experimental economics in transportation: A focus on social influences and the provision of information. Transp. Res. Record 2156, 47--55. GAO, 2009. Aviation and Climate Change. United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC. Green, J.E., 2002. Greener by design -- the technology challenge. Aer. J. 106 (1056), 57--113. Hudda, N., Gould, T., Hartin, K., Larson, T.V., Fruin, S.A., 2014. Emissions from an international airport increase particle number concentrations 4-fold at 10 km downwind. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (12), 6628--6635. IATA, 2014. World Air Transport Statistics, 58$^{\text{th}}$ edition. International Air Transport Association, Montr\'{e}al, Canada. ICAO, 2012. Carbon Emissions Calculator Document, Version 5. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montr\'{e}al, Canada. IPCC, 1999. Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. IPCC, 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. Jardine, C.N., 2009. Calculating the carbon dioxide emissions of flights. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford. Johnson, E.J., Shu, S.B., Dellaert, B.G.C., Fox, C., Goldstein, D.G., Haubl, G., Larrick, R.P., Payne, J.W., Peters, E., Schkade, D., Wansink, B., Weber, E.U., 2012. Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Lett. 23, 487--504. Kling, M., Hough, I., 2010. Brighter Planet Carbon Modelling Methodology. http://brighterplanet.com/ Kollmuss, A., Lane, J., 2008. Carbon offsetting \& air travel; Part 1: CO$_{2}$ emissions calculations. SEI Working Paper, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm. Kollmuss, A., Myers Crimmins, A., 2009. Carbon offsetting \& air travel; Part 2: Non-CO$_{2}$ emissions calculations. SEI Discussion Paper, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm. Legendre, P., 2005 Species associations: The Kendall coefficient of concordance revisited. J. Agr. Biol. Env. Stat. 10 (2), 226--245. Olivier, J.G.J., 1995. Scenarios for Global Emissions from Air Traffic. The Development of Regional and Gridded ($5^\circ \times 5^\circ$) Emissions Scenarios for Aircraft and for Surface Sources, Based on CPB Scenarios and Existing Emission Inventories for Aircraft and Surface Sources. RIVM-773002003, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Peeters, P., Williams, V., G\"{o}ssling, S., 2007. Air transport greenhouse gas emissions. Tourism and Climate Change Mitigation: Methods, Greenhouse Gas Reductions and Policies. NHTV Academic Studies No. 6, NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, Breda, The Netherlands. Peeters, P., Williams, V., 2009. Calculating emissions and radiative forcing. In G\"{o}ssling, S., Upham, P. (Eds.), Aviation Climate Change: Issues, Challenges and Solutions. Earthscan, London, pp. 69--87. Pejovic, T., Noland, R.B., Williams, V., Toumi, R., 2008. Estimates of UK CO$_2$ emissions from aviation using air traffic data. Climatic Change 88 (3--4), 367--384. Sausen, R., Isaksen, I., Grewe, V., Hauglustaine, D., Lee, D.S., Myhre, G., Kohler, M.O., Pitari, G., Schumann, U., Stordal, F., Zerefos, C., 2005. Aviation radiative forcing in 2000: An update on IPCC (1999). Meteorol. Zeitschrift 14 (4), 555--561. Sherry, L., 2015. Improving accuracy of airport emissions inventories using disparate data sets. IIE Transactions 47, forthcoming. Simone, N.W., Stettler, M.E.J., Barrett, S.R.H., 2013. Rapid estimation of global civil aircraft emissions with uncertainty quantification. Transp. Res. Part D 25, 33--41. Wilkerson, J.T., Jacobson, M.Z., Malwitz, A., Balasubramanian, S., Wayson, R., Fleming, G., Naiman, A.D., Lele, S.K., 2010. Analysis of emission data from global commercial aviation: 2004 and 2006. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (13), 6391--6408. Zou, B., Elke, M., Hansen, M., 2012. Evaluating air carrier fuel efficiency and CO$_2$ emissions in the U.S. airline industry. National Center of Excellence for Aviation Operations Research (NEXTOR), University of California, Berkeley, CA. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70923 |