Cerqueti, Roy and Sabatini, Fabio and Ventura, Marco (2016): Civic capital and support for the welfare state.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_71566.pdf Download (186kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We model the way the interplay between tax surveillance institutions and civic capital shapes taxpayers' support for welfare state. We show that, when tax surveillance is tight, rational civic-minded individuals express greater support for welfare spending than uncivic ones. We provide empirical evidence of these preferences using data from Italy, a country that has long posed a puzzle for public economists for its limited civic capital and large welfare state.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Civic capital and support for the welfare state |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | welfare state, redistribution, tax surveillance, social trust, civic capital, social capital |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H10 - General H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z18 - Public Policy |
Item ID: | 71566 |
Depositing User: | Fabio Sabatini |
Date Deposited: | 25 May 2016 05:52 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 22:38 |
References: | Aghion, P., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P. Shleifer, A. (2010). Regulation and distrust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(3), 1015-1049. Algan, Y., Cahuc, P. (2010). Inherited Trust and Growth. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2060-2092. Algan, Y., Cahuc, P. (2016). Trust, Growth and Well-being: New Evidence and Policy Implications. In Durlauf, S.N., Aghion, P. (Eds). Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., Sangnier, M. (2016). Trust and the Welfare State: The Twin Peaks Curve. The Economic Journal, DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12278. Andriani, L. (2015). Tax morale and prosocial behaviour: evidence from a Palestinian survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, DOI: 10.1093/cje/bev019. Antoci, A., Sabatini, F., Sodini, M. (2015). Online and offline social participation and social poverty traps. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 39 (4), 229-256. Amemiya T. (1978). The estimation of a simultaneous equation generalized probit model. Econometrica, 46, 1193-1205. Amemiya T. (1979). The estimation of a simultaneous equation tobit model. International Economic Review, 20, 169-181. Angrist, J.D., Pishke, J.S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Bénabou, R., Ok, E. A. (2001). Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2), 447-487. Bergh, A., Bjornskov, C. (2011). Historical levels of trust predict the current size of the welfare state. Kyklos 64(1), 1-19. Bigoni, M., Bortolotti, S., Casari, M., Gambetta, D., Pancotto, F. (2016). Amoral Familism, Social Capital, or Trust? The Behavioural Foundations of the Italian North-South Divide. The Economic Journal, DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12292. Bjornskov, C., Svendsen, G. T. (2013). Does social trust determine the size of the welfare state? Evidence using historical identification. Public Choice 157, 269-286. Bourdieu, P., 1980. Le capital social. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 31, 2-3. Cerulli G. (2014). ivtreatreg: A command for fitting binary treatment models with heterogeneous response to treatment and unobservable selection. Stata Journal, 14(3), 453-480. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S95-S120. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA, and London, UK: Harvard University Press. Corneo, G., Gruner, H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 83, 83-107. Daniele, G., Geys, B. (2015). Interpersonal trust and welfare state support. European Journal of Political Economy 39, 1-12. Ferrera, M. (2016). Rotta di collisione. Euro contro welfare? Bari: Laterza. Fine, B. (2001). Social capital versus social theory. London: Routledge. Finlay K., Magnusson L.M. (2009). Implementing weak-instrument robust tests for a general class of instrumental variables models. Stata Journal 9, 398-421. Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 82, 225-246. Gelissen, J. P. T. M., van Oorschot W. J. H., Finsveen, E. (2012). How does the welfare state influence individuals' social capital? European Societies iFirst 2012, 1-25. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(3), 1095-1131. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L. (2011). Civic capital as the missing link. In Benhabib, J.,Bisin, A., Jackson, M. (Eds). Handbook of Social Economics}. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L. (2016). Long term persistence. Journal of the European Economic Association (forthcoming). Kumlin, S., Rothstein, S. (2005). Making and breaking social capital. Comparative Political Studies 38 (4), 339-365. Lewbel, A. (2012). Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 30(1), 67-80. Meltzer, A. H., Richard, S. F. (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy 89(5), 914-927. Newey W.K. (1987). Efficient estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogenous explanatory variables. Journal of Econometrics, 36, 231-250. Piketty, T. (1995). Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3), 551-584. Rivers D., Vuong Q.H. (1988). Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. Journal of Econometrics 39, 347-366. Rothstein, B. (2002). Sweden. Social Capital in the Social Democratic State. The Swedish Model and Civil Society. In R.D. Putnam (ed). Democracies in Flux. Political Culture as a Condition for Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rothstein, B., Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41-72. Sabatini, F., Sarracino, F. (2016). Keeping up with the e-Joneses: Do online social networks raise social comparisons? MPRA Paper 69201. Sabatini, F. , Sarracino, F., Yamamura, E. (2014). Social norms on rent seeking and preferences for redistribution. MPRA Paper 57151. Smith R.J., Blundell R. (1986). An exogeneity test for the simultaneous equation tobit model with an application to labor supply. Econometrica, 54, 679-685. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society 27(2), 151-208. Wooldridge J.M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusets, London, England. Yamamura, E. (2012). Social capital, household income, and preferences for income redistribution. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(4), 498-511. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/71566 |