The 'Common Goood' in Pope Francis's Social Welfare Hypothesis

Amavilah, Voxi Heinrich (2016): The 'Common Goood' in Pope Francis's Social Welfare Hypothesis.

Abstract

In conventional welfare economics Pareto optimality requires competitive markets in which rational sellers use pure private resources to produce pure private goods and services for rational consumers. Although such theory acknowledges that market failures prevent Pareto optimality, it continues to advocate efficiency alone as the first best policy for society. Pope Francis has argued recently that the current economics of indifference to the common good is responsible for the enormous environmental damage to Earth (‘our common home’). He calls for an integral approach to consumption and production, one that takes the common good as the source and object of well-being. In that way consumption and production depend on the common good, and so too do associated time-discounted social satisfaction and surplus. This means that a socially desirable program is one that optimizes integral satisfaction and surplus, so that consumption and production functions are a system of endogenous (dynamical) simultaneous equations in which the utility of the integral person is a function of the social utility. I use insights from the economic models of resources (both exhaustible and renewable) to describe what the Pope means. The description is rather loose, but the implications of the exercise are wide and far-reaching. For example, I find that the socially efficient price is not Pareto efficient; it is one that allows for the marginal social utility, marginal social surplus, and marginal social royalty to the common good. In other words, under conventional welfare economics the marginal cost of generating the present value of the social surplus that eats up the present value of the rent to the common good guarantees the disutility of the integral person even as it meets the utility of the rational person. One policy implication of such a result recommends consideration of the common good as a key variable in both production and consumption. Precisely how that can be done is the direction in which future research must go. The question this result raises is about how to quantify the common good. For Pope Francis the level of analysis is integral subsidiarity, where the environment would be a good proxy for the common input to production and the common outputs are reduce poverty, inclusion (reduced inequality), and the protection of the common input.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social welfare, papal social welfare, common good, Pareto optimality, integral individual, integral firm, integral optimality, Pope Francis’s social welfare hypothesis, rational individual, rational firm
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B59 - Other; D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; N - Economic History > N5 - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Extractive Industries; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Amavilah, VH 2014 Human Knowledge and a Commonsensical Measure of Human Capital. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/57670/1/MPRA_paper_57670.pdf.

Amavilah, VH 2010 Introducing Anthropological Foundations of Economic Behavior, Organization, and Control. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/22921/1/MPRA_paper_22921.pdf.

Amavilah, VH 2014 Knowledge = Technology + Human Capital. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58847/1/MPRA_paper_58847.pdf.

Arrow, KJ 1985 ‘Optimal pricing, use, and exploration of uncertain natural resource stock’ in Applied Economics: Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow. Cambridge (Mass): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. See Eqs. (17.8 - 17.9, pp. 260-261.

Arrow, KJ 1963 Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Atkinson, AB 1970 On the measuring of inequality, Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3): 244-263.

Bastiat, F 1996[1845] “How does Paris get fed?” in Economic Sophisms. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education, Inc.

Baumol, WJ and Oates, WE 1988 Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Becker GS 1993 Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education, 3rd Edition. Chicago: The University of Chigo Press.

Becker, GS 1991 Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Becker, GS 1974 A theory of marriage: Part I, Journal of Political Economy, 81: 813-846.

Becker, GS 1973 A theory of marriage, Part II, Journal of Political Economy, 82, S11-S26.

Bergson, A 1966 Essays in Normative Economics. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Chapters 2, 3, and 6.

Bergson, A 1938 ‘A reformation of certain aspects of welfare economics, Quarterly Journal Of Economics 52(February): 310-334.

Biewan, M and Jenkins, SP 2003 Estimation of generalized entropy and Atkinson inequality indices from complex survey data. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.40394.de/dp345.pdf.

Campbell, DE 1987 Resource Allocation Mechanisms. New York: Cambridge Univesity Press. Chapters 3 and 7.

Clark, CW 1977 The economics of overexploitation, in Garertt Hardin and John Baden (eds) Managing the Commons. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Cohen, JM 1987 Integrated Rural Development: The Ethiopian Experience and the Debate. Uppsalla: The Scandinavian Istitute of African Studies.

Conceicao, P and Ferreira, P 2000 The Young Pearson’s Guide to the Theil Index. http://utip.lbj.utexas.edu/papers/utip_14.pdf.

Dasgupta, PS and Heal, GM 1979 Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

De V. Graaff, J 1967 Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dobb, M 1969 Welfare Economics and the Economics of Socialism: Towards a Commonsense Critique. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Easterlin, RA 2001 Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal 111(473): 465-84.

Easterlin, RA 1974 Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence, in R. David and M. Reder (eds) Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press, pp. 89-125.

Feldman, AM 1991 ‘Welfare economics’ in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (eds) The New Palgrave: The World of Economics. New York: W.W. Norton, pp. 713-726.

Fiocca, M 1994 From Endogenous Constraints to Economic Results: The passage through morality, uncertainty and strategies. Brookfield: Dartmouth.

Fisher, AC 1985 Resources and Environmental Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fleming, M 1957 ‘Cardinal welfare and individualistic ethics: A comment,’ Journal of Political Economy, 65: 355-357.

Fleming, M 1952 ‘A cardinal concept of welfare,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66: 366-384.

Haavelmo, T 1960 A Study in the Theory of Investment. Chocago” University of Chicag Press. p. 149.

Hammond, PJ (Undated) Harsanyi’s utilitarian theorem: A simpler proof and some ethical connotations. http://web.stanford.edu/~hammond/HarsanyiFest.pdf.

Hammond, PJ 1987 ‘On reconciling Arrow’s theory of social welfare with Harsanyi’s fundamental utilitarianism,’ in GR Feiwel (ed) Arrow and Foundation of the Theory of Economic Policy. London and New York: Macmillan and New York University Press. Chapter 4, pp. 179-222.

Harris, DP 1970 ‘Risk analysis in mineral investment decisions,’ Transactions, 247: 193-201.

Harsanyi, JC 1955 ‘Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, interpersonal comparison of utility,’ Journal of Political Economy, 63: 309-321.

Harsanyi, JC 1953 ‘Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking,’ Journal of Political Economy, 6: 434-435.

Helliwell, J, Layard, R, and Sachs, J various World Happiness Reports. http://worldhappiness.report/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/03/HR-V1_web.pdf.

Henderson, JM and Quandt, RE 1980 Microeconomic Theory: A mathematical approach, 3rd edition. London: McGraw-Hill International Book Company. Chapter 11, pp. 285 - 321.

Hotelling, H 1933 The economics of exhaustible resources, Journal of Political Economy, 39: 137-75. [Also available in The Collected Economics Articles of Harold Hotelling, Adrian C. Darnell (ed). New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 64-92.

Kaldor, N 1939 Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility, Economic Journal, 49: 542-52.

Kemp, MC and Ng, Y-K 1976 On the existence of social welfare functions: Social orderings and social decision functions, Economica, 43(February): 59-66.

Kornai, J 1981 .Control by norms,’ in J. Kornai and B. Martos (eds) Non-Price Control. Amsterdam.New York: North-Holland Publishing Company. Chapter 4.

Layard, R 2006 Happiness: lessons from a new Science. New York: Penguin Books.

Little, IMD 1950 A Critique of Welfare Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lucas, RE 1993 Making a miracle, Econometrica, 61(2): 251-272.

McKenzie, LW 1968 ‘Accumulation programs of maximum utility and the von Neumann facet’ in JN Wolfe (ed) Value, Capital, and Growth: Papers in Honoring Sir John Hicks. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Chapter 15, pp. 353-383.

Medar, M, Oun, K, and Looring, M 2012 Economic Growth Versus Development of Social Welfare Structures in Europe. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00665707/document.

Neher, PA 1990 Natural Resource Economics: Conservation and Exploitation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nicholson, W 2002 Microeconomic Theory: Basic principles and extensions, 8th edition. Newo York: Southwestern/Thomson Learning.

Ogburn, WF 1957 ‘The meaning of technology’ in Francis R. Allen, Hornwll Hart, Delbert C. Miller, William F. Ogburn, and Meyer F. Nimkoff (eds) Technological Change. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Ostrom, E 2009 Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Noble Prize Lecture, December, 8. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2009/ostrom_lecture.pdf.

Ostrom, V and Ostrom, E 1977 A theory for institutional analysis of common pool problems, in Garertt Hardin and John Baden (eds) Managing the Commons. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Ostrom, E 1977 Collective action and the tragedy of he commons, in Garertt Hardin and John Baden (eds) Managing the Commons. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Pigou, AC 1920 The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan, Part II.

Pollak, RA 1979 Bergson-Samuelson welfare functions and the theory of social choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(1): 73-90.

Pope Francis, 2015a Laudato Si: On care for our common home (Encyclical Letter). Huntington (IN): Our Sunday Visitor, Inc.

Pope Francis 2015b ‘Speech at World Meeting of popular Movements.’ http://en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/07/10/pope_francis_speech_at_world_meeting_of_popular_movements/1157291.

Pope Francis 2015c Speech at the White House. http://time.com/4045956/pope-francis-us-visit-white-house-transcript/.

Pope Francis 2015d Speech to U.S. Joint Congress. http://www.usccb.org/about/leadership/holy-see/francis/papal-visit-2015/media-resources/upload/11-EN-congressional-address.pdf.

Pope Francis 2015e Rmarks at the National September 11 Memorial Museum. http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/full-text-pope-francis-speech-at-the-911-memorial-and-museum-39576/.

Pope Francis 2015f Address to UN General Assembly. http://www.popefrancisvisit.com/schedule/address-to-united-nations-general-assembly/. Pope Francis 2015g Speech on environmental Conservation at UNEP, Kenya. http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2015/11/26/read-pope-francis-speech-on-environmental-conservation-at-unep_c1250417.

Pope Leo XIII [1891] Rerum Novarum: Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII on Capital and Labor. http://w2.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum.html.

Rawls, J 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge mass): Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J 1974 ‘Some reasons for the maxmin criterion,’ American Economic Review Papers and proceedings, 64: 141-146.

Reynolds, M and Smolensky, E 1977 ‘Welfare economics, OR, when is a change an improvement?’ in Sidney Weintraub 9ed) Modern Economic Thought. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylavania. Chapter 22, pp. 447-460, and Figure 2, p. 464.

Romer, PM 1990 Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): S71-S102.

Rousseau, J-J 1984 A Discourse on Inequality (Maurice Cranston, translation, introduction, and notes). New York: Penguin Books.

Samuelson, PA 1947 [1983 enlarged] Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Economic Studies of Harvard University Press.

Samuelson, PA 1954 The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36: 387-389. Studies

Samuelson PA 2004 Abram Bergson, 1914-2003: A biographical memoir. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, The National Academies Press: Biographical Memoirs, 84: 21-31.

Sanders, B 2016 The Speech Bernie Sanders Gave at the Vatican. Time Magazine online: http://time.com/4296102/bernie-sanders-vatican-speech-transcript/ (April 15).

Scitovisky, T 1941 ‘A note on welfare propositions in economics, Review of Economic Studies, 9: 77-88.

Sen, A 1973 ‘On ignorance and equal distribution,’ American Economic Review, 63: 1022-10224.

Sen, A 1970 Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

Sher, W and Pinola, R 1981 Microeconomic Theory: A synthesis of classical theory and the modern approach. New York/Oxford: North Holland. Chapter 13.

Smith, A 1961/1967 [1759] The Theory of Moral Sentiments. https://books.google.com/books?id=xVkOAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Smith+theory+of+moral+sentiments+2006&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFq6rU5P_LAhVS42MKHbSNChMQ6AEIHTAA#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Smith, A. 1937 1776] An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library.

Szirmai, A 2005 The Dynamics of Socio-Economic Development: A introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Theil, H 1967 Economics and Information Theory. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.

Vickery, WS 1945 ‘Measuring marginal utility by reactions to risk,’ Econometrica, 13: 319-333.