Sokolovska, Olena and Sokolovskyi, Dmytro (2016): Optimization of government trade behavior and its implication for small developing economy (the case of Ukraine).
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_71983.pdf Download (398kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The article deals with problem of optimization of government behavior in trade policy decision-making in small open developing economy. Based on conceptual model of government behavior we define main elements of effective trade policy. We found both their conformity to certain economic framework and conditions of their changes with each other. The analysis of advantages and disadvantages of government patterns of trade behavior showed that in order to regulate the small open developing economy its government should provide policy, based on applying of tax instruments, notably, tariffs; non-tariff measures in such conditions are as auxiliary tools. Systemic non-tariff restrictions could be regarded as an effective tool for developed innovative economies. The originality of the paper consists in developing of model of efficient government behavior in trade policy decision-making depending on the framework of national economy; also both conditions of untimely changes of government behavior patterns and ineffective frameworks appeared as consequence of these changes, were defined. We provide an econometric analysis in order to determine whether commodity exports are sensitive to reduction or elimination of tariffs (as in the case of Ukrainian exports and EU import duties). This analysis showed that now in Ukrainian economy there are commodities which are both sensitive and resistant to tariff changes.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Optimization of government trade behavior and its implication for small developing economy (the case of Ukraine) |
English Title: | Optimization of government trade behavior and its implication for small developing economy (the case of Ukraine) |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | government behavior, trade policy, tariffs, econometric analysis |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C50 - General F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H20 - General H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General |
Item ID: | 71983 |
Depositing User: | pan Dmytro Sokolowski |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jun 2016 05:42 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 20:11 |
References: | A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis (2012), United Nations and World Trade Organization. Association agreement between the European Union and its member states, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part. 2013. Bagwell K., Staiger R. (2004), Economic Theory and the Interpretation of GATT/WTO. In M. Szenberg and L. Ramrattan (Ed.), New Frontiers in Economics (pp. 205-234). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Calmfors, L., Horn, H. (1986), Trade Unions, Wage Formation and Macroeconomic Stability. New York: Springer. Council Regulation (EC) №1186/2009 of 16 November 2009 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty. Official Journal of the European Union, L324/23, 9002.21.01. Ethier, W. (2004), Political Externalities, Nondiscrimination, and a Multilateral World. Review of International Economics, 12(3), 303-320. Ethier, W. (2007), The theory of trade policy and trade agreements: A critique. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(3), 605-623. European Commission proposes temporary tariff cuts for Ukrainian exports to the EU http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-250_en.htm. Brussels, Accessed 25 February 2016. EU-Ukraine Association Agreement to start applying in two stages (2014), Press Release №ST13634/14. Council of the European Union. Gawande, K., Krishna, P., Olarreaga, M. (2009), What Governments Maximize and Why: The View from Trade. International Organization, 63(3), 491–532. Gawande, K., Magee, C. (2012), Free Riding and Protection for Sale. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 735-747. Gawande, K., Krishna, P., Olarreaga, M. (2015), A Political-Economic Account of Global Tariffs. Economics & Politics, 27(2), 204-233. Chalk N. A. (2001), Tax Incentives in the Philippines: A Regional Perspective, IMF Working Papers WP/01/181. Grossman, G. M., Helpman E. (1994), Protection for Sale. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 833-850. Grossman, G. M., Horn, H. (2013), Why the WTO? An Introduction to the Economics of Trade Agreements. In H. Horn and P. C. Mavroidis (Ed.), Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law Economics of Trade Agreements, Border Instruments, and National Treasures (pp. 9-67). Cambridge University Press. Kerr, W. A., Gaisford J. D. (2007), Handbook on International Trade Policy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, 64(3), 291-303. Ludema, R. D., Mayda, A. M. (2013), Do terms-of-trade effects matter for trade agreements? Theory and evidence from WTO countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, doi: 10.1093/qje/qjt016. Lundstrom, S. (2003), Effects of economic freedom on growth and the environment – implications for cross-country analysis. Göteborg University. 2003. Working Paper N 115. Mahmood, K. (2014), Trade Liberalization and Economic Growth: A Case Study of Selected SAARC Member Countries. Islamabad: PRIME Institute. Mahrenbach, L. C. (2013), The Trade Policy of Emerging Powers: Strategic Choices of Brazil and India. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V. (2012), Votes, Vetoes, and the Political Economy of International Trade Agreements. Princeton: Princeton University Press Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V. (2014), The Domestic Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements in Hard Times. Princeton: Princeton Working Paper. Ray, E. J. (1987), Changing patterns of protectionism: The fall in tariffs and the rise in non-tariff barriers. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 8, 285–327. Regulation (EU) No 374/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the reduction or elimination of customs duties on goods originating in Ukraine. Official Journal of the European Union. L118/1. 22.4.2014. Rivera, B., Romer, P. (1999), Economic integration and endogenous growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 531-555. Saggi, K., Yildiz, H. M., Stoyanov, A. (2015), Do free trade agreements affect tariffs of non-member countries? A theoretical and empirical investigation. Vanderbilt University. Department of Economics. Working Papers, VUECON-15-00010. Sokolovska O. (2016), Unilateral tariff cuts: a theory. The 3rd International Conference on Modern Re-search’s in Management, Economics and Accounting. – Istanbul, Turkey, March 15, 2016. Sokolovska O., Sokolovskyi D. (2015), Tax incentive regimes: models and research methods, MPRA Paper No.62415, 8 p., https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/62415/1/MPRA_paper_62415.pdf. Sokolovskyi D., Sokolovska O. (2011), The effect of tax-tariff reform: evidence from Ukraine, MPRA Paper No. 42643, 55 p., https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/42643/4/MPRA_paper_42643.pdf. Stoyanov, A., Yildiz, H. M. (2015), Preferential versus multilateral trade liberalization and the role of political economy. European Economic Review, 80, pp. 140-164. Trabandt M. (2011), The LafferCurve Revisited / M. Trabandt, H. Uhlig // Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 58(4), pp. 305-327. Trade and public policies: A closer look at non-tariff measures in the 21st century (2012), In World Trade Report 2012. World Trade Organization. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/71983 |