Transactional approach in assessment of operational performance of companies in transport infrastructure

Dubrovsky, Valery and Yaroshevich, Natalya and Kuzmin, Evgeny (2016): Transactional approach in assessment of operational performance of companies in transport infrastructure. Published in: Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management , Vol. 9, No. 2 (March 2016): pp. 389-412.

Abstract

Purpose: Offer an alternative method to assess operational performance of companies in transport infrastructure of a region by making a comparison between transaction costs. The method is supposed to be a cross-functional and possibly applied to an analysis of economic entities of a different order (country, region, sector, companies) while evaluating “viscosity” / complexity of the outside and the inside.

Design/methodology/approach: The paper includes an analysis of various methodological approaches to assess a development level of the transport infrastructure in a region. Within the author's approach and for purposed of the research, an index of transaction capacity or the transactionalness index is proposed, which determines a level of transaction costs calculated against the cost of production and revenue. The approach is piloted using the region-wise consolidated financial data of companies involved in the Russian transport infrastructure for 2005/2013.

Findings: The proposed alternative way to measure corporate operating efficiency has proved its academic consistency. A specific comparison between the transaction costs using the transactionalness index allows first to identify companies or regions/sectors, where there is excess complexity of economical communication in bargaining. Secondly, the index does not only point out indirectly to a degree of development in the institutional environment, but also the infrastructure (the transport one in the example given). Third, the transactionalness level may say of uncertainty and risks. As an addition to theoretical and methodological aspects of transaction costs, the authors justify an approach to their size estimation, as well as their differentiation dividing them into two groups: those of a natural type and a background type. In a course of their discussion, the authors have concluded that there are such transaction costs in place, which are standard in a manner of speaking.

Originality/value: There is a discussion whether it is scientifically reasonable to use an index of transactionalness. There are reasons for applicability of the alternative approach to assess operational performance of companies in transport infrastructure as an indicative criterion of favouring external conditions to execute exchange transactions. According to the authors, a high level of transactionalness is associated with a low development level of transport infrastructure in a region. This says that their competitiveness is specifically less.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: transactionalness, transport infrastructure, transaction costs, performance of transport infrastructure
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L91 - Transportation: General

References

Arkhiereev, S.I. (2000). Transaction costs and inequalities in conditions of market transformation. Moscow: Business Inform.

Arrow, K. (1969). The organization of economic activity: issues pertinent to the choice of market versus non-market allocation. The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditure: The PPB System, 1, 47-64.

Auzan, A. (Ed.). (2006). Institutional economics: New institutional economics: course book. Moscow: INFRA-M, p. 51

Balsevich, A.A., Yudkevich, M.M., & Podkolzina, E.A. (2009). Transaction costs. Part 3: Priority national projects. Education. Moscow: GU VSHE Publishing House.

Burkov, A.L. (1999). Transaction costs as a criterion of performance in reforms of ownship relationships: academic papers. IE UB RAS.

Davidson, P. (2002). Financial markets, money, and the real world. Edward Elgar Publishing, 208. doi:10.4337/9781843765585

Demchuk, A. (2002). Portfolio optimization with concave transaction costs. FAME Research Paper Series from International Centre for Financial Asset Management and Engineering: Research Paper, 103, 38. doi:10.2139/ssrn.481102

Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic behaviour and institutions. Cambridge University Press.

Gabriel, S.A., Mattey, J.P., & Wascher, W.L. (2013). Compensating differentials and evolution in the quality-of-life among US states. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, 619-649.

Harris L. (2003). Trading and exchanges: market microstructure for practitioners. Oxford University Press.

Jabusch, D.M. (1985). Public speaking: a transactional approach. Allyn and Bacon.

Jinlong, Z. (2003). Test and analysis of the cozy extent of the overhead railway vehicles. Urban Mass Transit, 6 (2), 46-51.

Jochimsen, R. (Ed.). (1966). Theorie der Infrastruktur, Grundlagen der marktwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Tübingen: JCB Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

Haywood, R. (2012). Railways, urban development and town planning in Britain: 1948-2008. Ashgate Publishing.

Heinesen, E.A. (1992). Note on the simple two-variable CES transaction function in macroeconomic rationing models, No. 92-08, discussion papers. University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.

Kleiner, G.B. (1994). Risks of industrial enterprises (how to reduce and offset them). Russian Journal of Economics, 5-6, 85-92.

Kleiner, G.B., Tambovtsev, V.L., & Katchalov, R.M. (1997). Enterprise in unstable economic environment: risks, strategy, security. Moscow: Economics, 25.

Kokorev, V. (1996). Institutional reforms in modern Russia: analysis of dynamics in transaction costs. Economics Affairs, 12, 61-87, 63, 66.

Krylov, P.M., & Runova, T.G. (2008). Economic geography and regional studies: textbook. Moscow: MGIU.

Kuzmin, E. (2013). More theoretical and empirical studies of transaction costs in the economy: transactionalness in the Russian economy. Proceedings of the Saratov University. New series. Economy. Management. Law, 1, Vol. 13, 29-37.

Kuz'minov, I.Ya., Bendukidze, K.A., & Yudkevich, M.M. (2006). Course of institutional economics: institutions, networks, transaction costs, contracts. Moscow: GU VSHE Publishing House.

Lahiri, K., & Yao, W. (2004). A dynamic factor model of the coincident indicators for the US transportation sector. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 11, No. 10, 595-600. doi:10.1080/1350485042000271125

Lakshamanan, T.R. (2011). The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.01.001

Lipiec, Yu. G., Pulyarkin, V.A., & Schlichter, S.B. (1999). Geography of world economics: course book. Moscow: VLADOS Hum. and Publ. Centre.

Maher, M.E. (1997). Transaction cost economics and contractual relations. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21 (2), 147-170. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013664

Milgrom, P.R., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization, and management. Prentice-Hall.

Molle, W. (2004). Global economic institutions. Routledge, 213-236. doi:10.4324/9780203356609

Murzaev, I.V. (2013). Regulation of cycles in regional infrastructure development in modern Russian economics. Cand. Sci (Econ.) thesis abstract. Kazan.

Nadiri, I.M. (1996). Constitution of highway capital to industry and national productivity. In I.M. Nadiri, & T.P. Mamuneas. Final Report FHWA.

Popov, E.V. (2009). Transaction function: cooperation costs planning. Economy of Russia and Europe: Problems and Cooperation Prospects, Ed. 1, Vol. 1, Ch. 1, 63-72.

Popov, E.V. (2011). Transactions. Ekaterinburg: Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences.

Popov, E.V. (2011). Transactionalness in economic institutes of development. Bulletin of UrFU, Economics and Management Series, 4.

Radaev, V.V. (1999). Russian business: structure of transaction costs. Social Studies and Present, 6, 5-19.

Ray, M.H., Weir, J.A., & Hopp, J.A. (2003). In-service performance of traffic barriers. Transportation Research Board, Vol. 490.

Scherbinin, M.M. (2011). Management of transaction costs based on dynamic standard theory. In N.A. Musatova, & M.M. Scherbinin, Innovative technologies in competitiveness management in area socio-economic systems: Proceedings of the 9th All-Russian Conference of Young Researchers. Yekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of UB RAS, 104-111.

Serebryakov, F.A. (2007). Transaction costs in Russian economics: monograph. Moscow: RGUPS.

Sharon, J. Erenburg. (2014). Linking public capital to economic performance, public capital: the missing link between investment and economic growth. Economics Public Brief, 14. The Level Economics Institute.

Shastitko, A.E. (1997). Transaction costs (content, evaluation and correlation with transformation challenges). Economic Affairs, 7, 65-76.

Sheviakov, A. & Kleiner, G. (1993). Socio-economic monitoring: concept, challenges and prospects. Economics and Mathematical Methods, Vol. 29, No. 1, 5-14.

Stakhanov, V.N., Platonov, V.S. (1993). Market infrastructure: course book. Rostov-on-Don: RPNKHD Press.

Stigler, G. (1972). The law and economics of public policy: a plea to the scholars. Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1-12. doi:10.1086/467476

Syrov, M.V. (2008). Transaction costs of innovation process. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State Open University.

Thrall, G.I. (2002). Business geography and new real estate market analysis. Oxford University Press.

Voicu, A. & Lahr, M., L. (2012). Creating a cost of doing business index. Working paper No. 141. New Jersey: Centre for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.

Wallis, J.J., & North, D. (1986). Measuring the transaction sector in the American economy, 1870-1970. In Stanley, L. Engerman, & Gallman, R.E. (Eds.), Long-term factors in American economic growth. University of Chicago Press, 95-162, 96, 100.

Wing, l.S. (2007). The broader benefits of transportation infrastructure. In S. Wing, Anderson, & Lakshamanan, T.R. Discussion Paper, 10. OECD, JTRC.

Zhang, F. (2009). Economic analysis of Chinese transportation. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.