Harvesting Control Rules that deal with Scientific Uncertainty

Da-Rocha, Jose-Maria and García-Cutrin, Javier and Gutierrez, Maria Jose (2016): Harvesting Control Rules that deal with Scientific Uncertainty.

Abstract

By using robustness methods we design HCRs that explicitly include scientific uncertainty. Under scientific uncertainty –when the perceived model can be generated by a nearby op- erating model– robust HCRs are designed assuming that the (inferred) operating model is more persistent than the perceived model. As a result, a robust HCR has a steeper ratio between fishing mortality and biomass than a non robust one. We prove that constant effort HCRs are not robust. Moreover, rather than decreasing fishing mortality reference points for exploitation, the optimal robust response to scientific uncertainty is to increases biomass precautionary limit points when knowledge about the stock status decreases. Finally, we show that robustness can be implemented if fishing mortality is increased faster than lin- early –by a factor of 2-fold– when a stock is assessed as above 0.5BMSY. We illustrate our findings by designing HCRs for 17 ICES stocks using this rule of thumb.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: HCR, Robustness
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q22 - Fishery ; Aquaculture

References

Athanassogloua, S. and Xepapadeas, A. (2012). Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When and how to be precautious. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63(3):304–320.

Da-Rocha, J. M. and Mato-Amboage, R. (2016). On the benefits of including age-structure in harvest control rules. Forthcoming Environmental and Resource Economics.

Fellner, W. (1965). Probability and Profit: A Study of Economic Behavior Along Bayesian Lines. Irwin Series in Economics. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL.

Francis, R. and Shotton, R. (1997). “risk” in fisheries management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54:1699–1715.

Hannesson, R. (1975). Fishery dynamics: a north atlantic cod fishery. Canadian Journal of Economics, 8:171–173.

Hansen, L. P. and Sargent, T. J. (2008). Robustness. Princeton University Press, Prince- ton,NJ.

Kell, L., Mosqueira, I., Frosjean, P., Fromentin, J.-M., Garcia, D., Hillary, R., Jardim, E., Mardle, S., Pastoors, M. A. Poos, J., Scott, F., and D.Scotts, R. (2007). Flr: An open- source framework for the evaluation and development of management strategies. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64:640–646.

Pukelsheim, F. (1994). The three sigma rule. The American Statistician, 48(2):88–91.

Punt, A. and Donovan, G. (2007). Developing management procedures that are robust to uncertainty: lessons from the international whaling commission. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64:603–612.

Roseta-Palma, C. and Xepapadeas, A. (2004). Robust control in water management. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 29(1):21–34.

Xepapadeas, A. and Roseta-Palma, C. (2013). Instabilities and robust control in natural resource management. Portuguese Economic Journal, 12(3):161–180.