Batabyal, Amitrajeet and Beladi, Hamid (2016): A game model of competition for market share between a new good producer and a remanufacturer. Published in: Economics Bulletin , Vol. 36, No. 2 (11 June 2016): pp. 963-969.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_72233.pdf Download (57kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We analyze the hitherto unstudied duopolistic interaction between a new good producer and a remanufacturer who compete for a dominant share of the market for a particular product. Each firm i spends d_i ≥ 0 on product development to sway consumers and this expenditure increases the likelihood that firm i captures a dominant market share. The revenue to each firm from obtaining a dominant market share is r>0. Our analysis of this interaction leads to five results. First, given the two product development expenditures (d_1,d_2), we specify the expected profit for each firm i. Second, we describe the function that characterizes each firm’s best response function. Third, we compute the unique Nash equilibrium. Fourth, we show what happens to this Nash equilibrium when the revenue r increases. Finally, we study what happens to the Nash equilibrium when the remanufacturer’s revenue from capturing a dominant market share is still r but the new good producer’s revenue is θ r, where θ >1.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A game model of competition for market share between a new good producer and a remanufacturer |
English Title: | A game model of competition for market share between a new good producer and a remanufacturer |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Duopoly, Market Share, Nash Equilibrium, New Good Producer, Remanufacturer |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L21 - Business Objectives of the Firm |
Item ID: | 72233 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Amitrajeet Batabyal |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jun 2016 04:32 |
Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2019 05:01 |
References: | Atasu, A., Sarvary, M., and Van Wassenhove, L.N. 2008. Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy, Management Science, 54, 1731-1746. Atasu, A., Guide, V.D.R., and Van Wassenhove, L.N. 2010. So what if remanufacturing cannibalizes my new product sales? California Management Review, 52, 56-76. Aydin, R., Kwong, C.K., and Ji, P. 2015. A novel methodology for simultaneous consideration of remanufactured and new products in product line design, International Journal of Production Economics, 169, 127-140. Ferrer, G., and Swaminathan, J.M. 2006. Managing new and remanufactured products, Management Science, 52, 15-26. Ferrer, G., and Swaminathan, J.M. 2010. Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products, European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 370-379. Lebreton, B., and Tuma, A. 2006. A quantitative approach to assessing the profitability of car and truck tire remanufacturing, International Journal of Production Economics, 104, 639-652. Lund, R.T. 1984. Remanufacturing, Technology Review, 87, 19-23, 28-29. Mitra, S., and Webster, S. 2008. Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies, International Journal of Production Economics, 111, 287-298. Shi, L., Sheng, Z., and Xu, F. 2015. The dynamics of competition in remanufacturing: A stability analysis, Economic Modelling, 50, 245-253. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/72233 |