Derivative use and its impact on Systematic Risk of Indian Banks: Evidence using Tobit model

Sinha, Pankaj and Sharma, Sakshi (2016): Derivative use and its impact on Systematic Risk of Indian Banks: Evidence using Tobit model.

Abstract

The use of derivatives by Indian banks has increased in the recent past. Derivatives are complicated assets, and many characteristics of these relatively new assets have been evolving day by day. The fast growth of bank involvement in derivative markets has raised concerns about the potential hazards of this activity. On the flipside, certain characteristics of derivatives make them highly useful in hedging risks. It is a well-known fact that derivative activity is concentrated among relatively larger banks. However, very little is known about other factors that govern the decisions regarding derivative usage by banks. In theory, an exposure of bank to interest rate risk should impact the derivative transaction volume. Furthermore, the use of derivative will vary according to bank capital, bank size and its use of alternatives to hedge. The paper uses the financial characteristics of banks those trade in derivatives and banks those do not trade in derivatives , by using bank level data for 46 Indian Scheduled Commercial banks for the year 2013. A Tobit Model is used to analyse censored data on notional amount of derivative use and its relationship with various financial characteristics of banks. These financial characteristics include bank size, capital adequacy, exposure to credit and interest rate risk, profitability and liquidity. We find that derivative user banks have higher liquidity, lower interest margins, are larger. Additionally, there is evidence in support of the “assurance” capital hypothesis highlighting the use of derivatives by large well capitalised banks. The larger banks exposed with lower interest margins and higher capital ratios are more likely to use derivatives to hedge their interest rate risk. Using an augmented market model, we further calculate systematic risk exposure of banks for the year 2013 and test whether usage of derivatives and interest rate derivatives contribute towards an aggravation in the systematic risk exposure of banks. The results point towards a significant decrease in exchange rate riskiness using derivatives as well as a significant decline in the long term interest risk as well. It implies and motivates banks to indulge in derivative trading, as the systemic risk do not seem to be potentially aggravated by using them. Nevertheless, derivative activity is concentrated among well capitalised banks which can safely manage risks.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: derivatives , systematic risk, hedging, exchange rate exposure, interest rate risk
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation

References

Ashraf, D., Altunbas, Y., & Goddard, J. (2007). Who transfers credit risk? Determinants of the use of credit derivatives by large US banks. The European Journal of Finance, 13(5), 483-500.

Booth, J. R., Smith, R. L., & Stolz, R. W. (1984). Use of interest rate futures by financial institutions. Journal of Bank Research, 15(1), 15-20.

Broccardo, E., Mazzuca, M., & Yaldiz, E. (2014). The use and determinants of credit derivatives in Italian banks. The Journal of Risk Finance, 15(4), 417-436.

Carter, D. A., & Sinkey Jr, J. F. (1998). The use of interest rate derivatives by end-users: The case of large community banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 14(1), 17-34.

Chitale, R. P. (2003). Use of Derivatives by India’s Institutional Investors: Issues and Impediments. Derivatives Markets in India, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, India.

Colquitt, L., & Hoyt, R. (1997). Determinants of Corporate Hedging Behavior: Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 64(4), 649-671..

Committee, B. (2012). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision, (September, 2012)

Cummins, J., Phillips, R., & Smith, S. (2001). Derivatives and Corporate Risk Management: Participation and Volume Decisions in the Insurance Industry. The Journal of Risk and Insurance,68(1), 51-91.

De Ceuster, M., Flanagan, L., Hodgson, A., & Tahir, M. I. (2003). Determinants of derivative usage in the life and general insurance industry: the Australian evidence. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 6(04), 405-431.

De Haas, R., & van Lelyveld, I. (2006). Foreign banks and credit stability in Central and Eastern Europe. A panel data analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(7), 1927–1952

Demsetz, R. S., & Strahan, P. E. (1997). Diversification, Size, and Risk at Bank Holding Companies. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(3), 300–313.

Demsetz, R., & Strahan, P. (1997). Diversification, Size, and Risk at Bank Holding Companies.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(3), 300-313

Dependent, L., Models, V., & Panel, U. (2013). Limited Dependent Variable Models Using Panel Data, 22(3), 307–338. Doidge, C., Griffin, J., & Williamson, R. (2006). Measuring the economic importance of exchange rate exposure. Journal of Empirical Finance, 13(4), 550-576.

Géczy, C., Minton, B. A., & Schrand, C. (1997). Why firms use currency derivatives. The Journal of Finance, 52(4), 1323-1354.

Gruber, M. J., & Warner, J. B. (1977). Bankruptcy costs: Some evidence.The journal of Finance, 32(2), 337-347.

Hogan, A. M., & Malmquist, D. H. (1999). Barriers to depository uses of derivatives: an empirical analysis. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 9(3), 419-440.

Kim, S. H., & Koppenhaver, G. D. (1993). An empirical analysis of bank interest rate swaps. Journal of Financial Services Research, 7(1), 57–72.

Maddala, G. (1987). Limited Dependent Variable Models Using Panel Data. The Journal of Human Resources, 22(3), 307-338.

Sinkey, J. F., & Carter, D. a. (2000). Evidence on the financial characteristics of banks that do and do not use derivatives. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 40(4), 431–449.

Sinkey, J. F., & Carter, D. A. (2001). Evidence on the financial characteristics of banks that do and do not use derivatives. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 40(4), 431-449.

Tufano, P. (1989). Financial innovation and first-mover advantages. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(2), 213-240.

Whidbee, D. a, & Wohar, M. (1999). Derivative activities and managerial incentives in the banking industry. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(3), 251–276.

Yong, H., & Robert-Chalmers, K. (2007b). Determinants of the Extent of Asia-Pacific Banks’ Derivative Activities. European Financial Management, 13(3), 1–37.

Yung-Ming, S., & Moles, P. (2010). What Motivates Banks to Use Derivatives: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Derivatives, 17(4), 67–78.