“Lock-in” Effect of Emission Standard and Its Impact on the Choice of Market Based Instruments

Qian, Haoqi and Wu, Libo and Tang, Weiqi (2016): “Lock-in” Effect of Emission Standard and Its Impact on the Choice of Market Based Instruments.

Abstract

A country’s existing emission standard policy will lead to a “lock in” effect. When the country plans to adopt new market-based instruments to control greenhouse gas emissions, it must consider this effect as it chooses among instruments to avoid larger efficiency loss. In this paper, we find that the “lock in” effect will cause a kink point to occur on the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve. This change of shape for the MAC curve reminds us to be cautious in choosing market-based instruments when applying Weitzman’s rule. We also introduce this concept into a dynamic multi-regional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for China and simulate MAC curves for all regions. After applying Weitzman’s rule, we propose a timeline for introducing price instruments under different marginal benefit (MB) curve scenarios.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Lock-in Effect; Marginal Abatement Cost Curve; Cap and Trade of Carbon Emissions Rights; Carbon Tax
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C68 - Computable General Equilibrium Models; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Alcamo, J., Mayerhofer, P., Guardans, R., van Harmelen, T., van Minnen, J., Onigkeit, J., Posch, M. and de Vries, M., 2002, “An integrated assessment of regional air pollution and climate change in Europe: findings of the AIR-CLIM Project”, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol.5, 257-272.

Abdelkhalek, T. and J.M. Dufour, 1998, “Statistical Inference for Computable General Equilibrium Models, with Application to A Model of the Moroccan Economy”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.4, 520-534. Chen, W., 2005, “The costs of mitigating carbon emissions in China: findings from China MARKAL-MACRO modeling.”, Energy Policy, Vol.33: 885–896.

Dellink, R., Hofkes, M., van Ierland, E., Verbruggen, H., 2004, “Dynamic modelling of pollution abatement in a CGE framework”, Economic Modelling, 21(6): 965-989.

Department of National Accounts of National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2011, “China Region input-output tables 2007”, China Statistics Press.

Department of Population and Employment Statistics, 2012, “Tabulation on the 2010 Population Census of the People’s Republic of China” , China Statistics Press.

Dixon, P. and M. Rimmer, 2002, “Dynamic general equilibrium modelling for forecasting and policy. A practical guide and documentation of MONASH”, Elsevier. Dong, H., Dai, H., Dong, L., Fujita, T., Geng, Y., Klimont, Z., Inoue, T., Bunya, S., Fujii, M. and Masui, T., 2015, “Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis”, Applied Energy, Vol.144, 165-174.

Harrison, G.W., R. Jones, LJ. Kimbell and R. Wigle, 1993, “How Robust Is Applied General Equilibrium Analysis? ”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol.15, 99–115.

Holland, S. P., 2012, “Emissions taxes versus intensity standards: Second-best environmental policies with incomplete regulation”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 63, 375-387.

Kesicki, F., 2011, “Marginal abatement cost curves for policy making – expert-based vs. model-derived curves”, Proceedings of 33rd IAEE International Conference, 6-9 June 2010, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Kesicki, F. 2012, “Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: Combining Energy System Modelling and Decomposition Analysis”, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 18(1): 27-37.

KIM, H., 2005, “Aggregation Over Firms and Flexible Functional Forms.”, Economic Record, Vol.81: 19-29. Klepper G. and S. Peterson, 2006, “Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: The influence of world energy prices”, Resource and Energy Economics, Vol.28, 1-23.

Kolstad, C.D., 1996, “Learning and Stock Effects in Environmental Regulation: The Case of Greenhouse Gas Emissions”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.31, 1-18.

Klein, L. R., 1946, “Macroeconomics and the Theory of Rational Behavior”, Econometrica, 14(2): 93-108.

Mayerhofer, P., de Vries, B., den Elzen, M., van Vuuren, D., Onigkeit, J., Posch, M. and Guardans, R., 2002, “Long-term, consistent scenarios of emissions, deposition, and climate change in Europe”, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol.5, 273-305.

Mansur, A. and J. Whalley, 1984, “Numerical Specification of Applied General Equilibrium Models: Estimation, Calibration, and Data, ” in H. E. Scarf and J. B. Shoven (eds.), Applied General Equilibrium Analysis.

McKinsey & Company, 2007. A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction, Retrieved on Feburary 2007 from: http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/sustainability/a_cost_curve_for_greenhouse_gas_reduction (accessed Jan. 2016)

McKitrick, R., 1999, “A Derivation of the Marginal Abatement Cost Curve”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.37, 306-314.

Morris, J., S. Paltsev and J. Reilly, 2012, “Marginal Abatement Costs and Marginal Welfare Costs for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions: Results from the EPPA Model”, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, Vol.17, 325-336.

Nataf , A., 1948, “Sur la possibilité de construction de certains macromodèles”, Econometrica, 16(3): 232-244.

Parry, I.W.H. and R.C. Williams III, 1999, “A second-best evaluation of eight policy instruments to reduce carbon emissions”, Resource and Energy Economics, Vol.21, 347-373.

Pizer, W.A., 1999, “The optimal choice of climate change policy in the presence of uncertainty”, Resource and Energy Economics, Vol.21, 255-287.

Pizer, W.A., 2002, “Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.85, 409-434.

Rutherford, Thomas F., 1998, "GAMS/MPSGE guide." GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC.

Stranlund, J.K. and Y. Ben-Haim, 2008, “Price-based vs. quantity-based environmental regulation under Knightian uncertainty: An info-gap robust satisficing perspective”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol.87, 443-449.

Syri, S., Amann, M., Capros, P., Mantzos, L., Cofala, J. and Klimont, Z., 2001, “Low-CO2 energy pathways and regional air pollution in Europe”, Energy Policy, Vol.29, 871-884.

Takeshita, T., 2012, “Assessing the co-benefits of CO2 mitigation on air pollutants emissions from road vehicles”, Applied Energy, Vol.97, 225-237.

van Vuuren, D. P., Cofala, J., Eerens, H. E., Oostenrijk, R., Heyes, C., Klimont, Z., den Elzen, M. G. J. and Amann, M., 2006, “Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe”, Energy Policy, Vol.34, 444-460.

van Vuuren, D.P., de Vries, B., Eickhout, B., Kram, T., 2004, “Responses to technology and taxes in a simulated world.”, Energy Economics, Vol.26: 579-601.

Wang C. and J. Chen, 2006, “Parameter uncertainty in CGE modeling of the macroeconomic impact of carbon reduction in China”, Tsinghua Science & Technology, Vol.11, 617-624.

Weitzman, M.L., 1974, “Prices vs. Quantities”, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.41, 477-491.

Weitzman, M.L., 1978, “Optimal Rewards for Economic Regulation”, The American Economic Review, 683-691.

Wigle, R.M., 1991, “The Pagan–Shannon Approximation: Unconditional Systematic Sensitivity in Minutes”, Empirical Economics, Vol.16, PP35–49.

Xu, ZY and Li, ST, 2008, “The Effect of Inter-regional Migration on Economic Growth and Regional Disparity”, The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, Issue 2, 38-52.

Zhang, S., Worrell, E. and Crijns-Graus, W., 2015, “Evaluating co-benefits of energy efficiency and air pollution abatement in China’s cement industry”, Applied Energy, Vol.147, 192-213.