Development and Land Acquisition in the View of Law and Economics

Dinda, Soumyananda (2015): Development and Land Acquisition in the View of Law and Economics.

Abstract

The marginal productivity theory determines the value of a land under ceteris peribus. Land price depends on economic opportunity, time and technology. Recently, development policy focuses on creation of economic opportunity that increases the demand for transferring land from primary to secondary or tertiary activities. Market mechanism is sufficient argument of distributive justice for land acquisition for development activity, but some time it fails. Landowners are heterogeneous in terms of knowledge, skill, risk preferences, attitudes, perception of future development benefits, etc. Incorporating the mind set of landowners, how do we assign the value of land and compensate for land transfer for developmental activities? This paper focuses on it with possible alternative viable solutions. There is good reason to insist on compensation of displaced landowners at market prices for distributive justice with economic efficiency. Given the heterogeneity in land valuations, the required compensation rates can be set at the market rate. But the role of income security is ignored in market mechanism. The role of complementarities of land with farming skills those are non-transferable that incorporate their concern for financial security, time preference, and pattern of skills. These concerns exhibited considerable diversity with a corresponding diversity of preferences over alternative forms of non-cash compensation. Hence a menu of alternative compensation packages ought to be offered, to cater to this diversity.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Land Acquisition, Economic Development, Displacement, Economic efficiency, Distributive Justice, Domain Law, Compensation Policy, Income Security, Risk Preference, Valuation, Market price
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law; K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K22 - Business and Securities Law; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q21 - Demand and Supply ; Prices; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q24 - Land

References

• Banerjee, A., Gertler, P. and Ghatak, M., (2002), Empowerment and Efficiency: Tenancy Reform in West Bengal, Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 239-280.

• Bardhan, P. and Mookherjee, D. (2011), Subsidized Farm Input Programs and Agricultural Performance: A Farm-Level Analysis of West Bengal’s Green Revolution, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 186-214.

• Ghatak, M., Mitra, S., Mookherjee, D. and Nath, A. (2012), Land Acquisition and Compensation in Singur: What Really Happened? Working Paper, March 2012, Institute for Economic Development, Boston University.

• Ghatak, M. and Ghosh, P., (2011), The Land Acquisition Bill: A Critique and a Proposal, Economic and Political Weekly, October 8, Vol XLVI (41), 65-72.

• Ghatak, M. and Mookherjee, D., (2011), Land Acquisition for Industrialization and Compensation for Displaced Farmers, Working Paper, October 2011, Institute for Economic Development, Boston University. http://people.bu.edu/dilipm/wkpap/land%20acquisitionJDEmscrpt.pdf