Wallace, Frederick and Perri, Timothy (2016): Economists behaving badly: Publications in predatory journals.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_73075.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The extent of publishing in predatory journals in economics is examined in this paper. A simple model of researcher behavior is presented to explore those factors motivating an economist or other academic to publish in predatory journals as defined by Beall (2015). Beall’s lists are used to identify predatory journals and publishers included in the Research Papers in Economics archives. Once identified, the affiliations of authors publishing in these outlets are determined in order to identify the characteristics of those publishing in predatory journals. The geographic dispersion of authorship is widespread. A very small subset of authors is registered on RePEc. Around forty-five percent of registered authors who publish in predatory journals in the data set have six or fewer publications. A surprising number of authors who are in the RePEc top 5% also published in predatory journals in 2015.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Economists behaving badly: Publications in predatory journals |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Predatory Publications, RePEc |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I20 - General |
Item ID: | 73075 |
Depositing User: | Frederick Wallace |
Date Deposited: | 15 Aug 2016 09:19 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 00:07 |
References: | Beall, J. “Predatory Publishers are Corrupting Open Access.” Nature, 489, 2012, 179. Beall, J. “Criteria for Determining Predatory Open Access Publishers.” Unpublished document, 3rd edition, 2015. https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/ Downloaded March 4, 2016. Blog: Research Papers in Economics. “Quality Control Committee: Looking for Volunteer.” June 13, 2016. https://blog.repec.org/ Bohannon, J. “Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?” Science, 342, 2013, 60-65. Butler, D. “The Dark Side of Publishing.” Nature, 495, 2013, 433-435. Card, D. and S. DellaVigna. “Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 2013, 144-161. Djuric, D. “Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection.” Science & Engineering Ethics, 21, 2015, 183-202. Mazieres, D. and E. Kohler. “Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List.” Unpublished paper, 2005. Downloaded on May 20, 2016 from https://scholarlyoa.com/2014/11/20/bogus-journal-accepts-profanity-laced-anti-spam-paper/ Omobowale, A.O. “Peripheral Scholarship and the Context of Foreign Paid Publishing in Nigeria.” Current Sociology, 62, 2014, 666-684. Shen, C. and B. Björk. “Predatory Open Access: A Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Characteristics.” BMC Medicine, 13, 2015, 1-15. Xia, J. “Predatory Journals and Their Article Publishing Charges.” Learned Publishing, 28, 2015, 69-74. Xia, J., J.L. Harmon, K.G. Connolly, R.M. Donnelly, M.R. Anderson, and H.A. Howard. “Who Publishes in ‘Predatory’ Journals?” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (7), 2015, 1406-1417. West, J.D., T. Bergstrom, and C.T. Bergstrom. “Cost Effectiveness of Open Access Publications.” Economic Inquiry, 52 (4), 2014, 1315-1321. Zimmermann, C. “Academic Rankings with RePEc.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis working paper, 2012. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/73075 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Economists behaving badly: Publications in predatory journals. (deposited 13 Jun 2016 09:14)
- Economists behaving badly: Publications in predatory journals. (deposited 15 Aug 2016 09:19) [Currently Displayed]