An agent-based stock-flow consistent model of the sustainable transition in the energy sector

Ponta, Linda and Raberto, Marco and Teglio, Andrea and Cincotti, Silvano (2016): An agent-based stock-flow consistent model of the sustainable transition in the energy sector.

Abstract

Major structural changes to the current fossil-fuel based economic system are needed in order to address the climate change challenge. To this purpose, effective Renewable Energy Sources (RES) support policies, along with concrete efforts towards the improvement of energy efficiency, have been adopted in many countries. One of these policies is the feed-in-tariff (FiT) mechanism, according to which electricity produced by RES is sold at guaranteed prices (feed-in tariffs), which are higher than market ones, for fixed periods of time. In this paper, we investigate how to foster a sustainability transition of the energy system towards an economically and ecologically sustainable growth path by using an enriched version of the Eurace model. Eurace has been enriched by including an energy sector where electricity is demanded by domestic producers and is supplied by a fossil-fuel based power producer as well as a renewable-energy based one. Both power producers undertake pricing and capacity investment decisions based on the price of imported fossil fuel and feed-in tariff government policy. In particular, we investigate how the economy is affected by the fiscal costs of financing the feed-in tariff mechanism and by the benefits of lower fossil fuels imports, in order to devise the policy with the best cost-benefit trade-off for the macroeconomy as a whole. Results show that the feed-in-tariff policy is effective in fostering the sustainability transition of the energy sector and that it increases the level of investments in the economy with a slightly positive impact on the unemployment rates. Moreover, we observe that its financing costs do not impact government finances in a relevant way. On the other hand, the higher level of investments occurs at the expense of the production of consumption goods, therefore with a negative impact for the living standards, at least according to the perspective of a consumerist society. However, if factors like better employment rates and the reduced GHG emissions are also taken into account, along with consumption, by an appropriate preference function, the final outcome on well-being should be probably deemed as favourable.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: sustainability transition, energy sector, feed-in tariff, agent-based modelling
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Balint, T., Lamperti, F., Mandel, A., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., Sapio, A., 2016. Complexity and the economics of climate change: a survey and a look forward. LEM Working Paper Series, 2016/29.

Battiston, S., Farmer, J.D., Flache, A., Garlaschelli, D., Haldane, A.G., Heesterbeek, H., Hommes, C., Jaeger, C., May, R., Scheffer, M., 2016. Complexity theory and financial regulation. Science 351 (6275), 818--819.

Burke, M., Craxton, M., Kolstad, C., Onda, C., Allcott, H., Baker, E., Barrage, L., Carson, R., Gillingham, K., Graff-Zivin, J., et al., 2016. Opportunities for advances in climate change economics. Science 352 (6283), 292--293.

Butler, L., Neuhoff, K., 2008. Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development. Renewable energy 33 (8), 1854--1867.

Caiani, A., Godin, A., Caverzasi, E., Gallegati, M., Kinsella, S., Stiglitz, J. E., 2016. Agent based-stock flow consistent macroeconomics: Towards a benchmark model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 69, 375 -- 408.

Caverzasi, E., Godin, A., 2015. Post-keynesian stock-flow-consistent modelling: a survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (1), 157--187.

Cincotti, S., Raberto, M., Teglio, A., 2010. Credit money and macroeconomic instability in the agent-based model and simulator eurace. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 4 (2010-26).

Cincotti, S., Raberto, M., Teglio, A., 2012. The Eurace macroeconomic model and simulator. In: Agent-based Dynamics, Norms, and Corporate Governance. The proceedings of the 16-th World Congress of the International Economic Association. Vol. II. Palgrave.

Cincotti, S., Raberto, M., Teglio, A., 2012. Macroprudential policies in an agent-based artificial economy. Agent-based Models and Economy Policy, 205--234.

Couture, T., Gagnon, Y., 2010. An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment. Energy policy 38 (2), 955--965.

Dawid, H., Harting, P., Neugart, M., 2014. Economic convergence: Policy implications from a heterogeneous agent model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 44, 54 -- 80.

Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., Roventini, A., September 2010. Schumpeter meeting Keynes: A policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34 (9), 1748--1767.

European Commission, 2011. Energy Roadmap 2050.

European Commission, 2011. A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050.

European Commission, 2013. Green Paper: A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies.

European Commission, 2013. A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030.

Farmer, J., Patelli, P., Zovko, I., 2005. The predictive power of zero intelligence in financial markets. PNAS 102, 2254--2259.

Farmer, J. D., Hepburn, C., Mealy, P., Teytelboym, A., 2015. A third wave in the economics of climate change. Environmental and Resource Economics 62 (2), 329--357.

Fouquet, D., Johansson, T. B., 2008. European renewable energy policy at crossroads—focus on electricity support mechanisms. Energy policy 36 (11), 4079--4092.

Geels, F. W., 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental innovation and societal transitions 1 (1), 24--40.

Gil, N., Beckman, S., 2009. Infrastructure meets business: building new bridges, mending old ones. California Management Review 51 (2), 6--29.

Gleick, P. H., 2003. Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science 302 (5650), 1524--1528.

Godley, W., Lavoie, M., 2012. Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth, 2nd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan.

IEA, 2015. World Energy Outlook 2015. IEA.

Jackson, T., Victor, P., Naqvi, A., Mar. 2016. Towards a Stock-Flow Consistent Ecological Macroeconomics. Wwwforeurope working papers series, WWWforEurope.

Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., 2015. Does credit create a ‘growth imperative’? a quasi-stationary economy with interest-bearing debt. Ecological Economics 120, 32--48.

Johannsdottir, L., McInerney, C., 2016. Calls for Carbon Markets at COP21: a conference report. Journal of Cleaner Production 124, 405--407.

Klein, A., 2008. Feed-in tariff designs: options to support electricity from renewable energy sources. Lightning Source Inc., Tennessee, USA.

Lipp, J., 2007. Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy policy 35 (11), 5481--5495.

McInerney, C., Johannsdottir, L., 2016. Lima Paris Action Agenda: Focus on Private Finance - note from COP21. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 707--710.

Menanteau, P., Finon, D., Lamy, M.-L., 2003. Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy 31 (8), 799--812.

Monasterolo, I., Raberto, M., 2016. A hybrid system dynamics--agent based model to assess the role of green fiscal and monetary policies. Available at SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2748266

Ozel, B., Nathanael, R. C., Raberto, M., Teglio, A., Cincotti, S., 2016. Macroeconomic implications of mortgage loans requirements: an agent based approach. Working Papers 2016/05, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain). https://ideas.repec.org/p/jau/wpaper/2016-05.html

Pastore, S., Ponta, L., Cincotti, S., 2010. Heterogeneous information-based artificial stock market. New J. Phys. 12, 053035.

Pindyck, R. S., 2015. The use and misuse of models for climate policy. NBER Working Paper #21097.

Ponta, L., Pastore, S., Cincotti, S., 2011. Information-based multi-assets artificial stock market with heterogeneous agents. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 12, 1235--1242.

Ponta, L., Raberto, M., Cincotti, S., 2011. A multi-assets artificial stock market with zero-intelligence traders. Europhys. Lett. 93, 28002.

Ponta, L., Scalas, E., Raberto, M., Cincotti, S., 2012. Statistical Analysis and Agent-Based Microstructure Modeling of High-Frequency Financial Trading. IEEE Journal Of Selected Topics In Signal Processing 6, 381--387.

Raberto, M., Cincotti, S., Teglio, A., 2014. Economic Policy and the Financial Crisis. Routledge Frontiers of Political Economy. Taylor & Francis, Ch. 9.

Raberto, M., Teglio, A., Cincotti, S., 2008. Integrating real and financial markets in an agent-based economic model: an application to monetary policy design. Computational Economics 32 (1), 147--162.

Raberto, M., Teglio, A., Cincotti, S., 2012. Debt deleveraging and business cycles. an agent-based persperctive. The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 6, 2012--27.

Rengs, B., Wackerle, M., Gazheli, A., Antal, M., van den Bergh, J., 2015. Testing innovation, employment and distributional impacts of climate policy packages in a macro-evolutionary systems setting. Tech. rep., WWWforEurope.

Rezai, A., Stagl, S., 2016. Ecological macroeconomics: Introduction and review. Ecological Economics 121, 181--185.

Russo, A., Riccetti, L., Gallegati, M., 2016. Increasing inequality, consumer credit and financial fragility in an agent based macroeconomic model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 26 (1), 25--47.

Safarzyńska, K., van den Bergh, J. C., 2016. Integrated crisis-energy policy: Macro-evolutionary modelling of technology, finance and energy interactions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Stern, N. H., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V., Bowen, A., Cameron, C., Catovsky, S., Crane, D., Cruickshank, S., Dietz, S., Edmonson, N., et al., 2006. Stern Review: The economics of climate change. Vol. 30. Cambridge University Press.

Teglio, A., Mazzocchetti, A., Ponta, L., Raberto, M., Cincotti, S., 2015. Budgetary rigour with stimulus in lean times: Policy advices from an agent-based model. Working Papers 2015/04, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain). https://ideas.repec.org/p/jau/wpaper/2015-07.html

Teglio, A., Raberto, M., Cincotti, S., 2012. The impact of banks' capital adequacy regulation on the economic system: An agent-based approach. Advances in Complex Systems 15 (supp02), 1250040.

The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, 2014. Better growth, better climate: The new climate economy report, synthesis report. Tech. rep.

Wolf, S., Schutze, F., Jaeger, C. C., 2016. Balance or synergies between environment and economy—a note on model structures. Sustainability 8 (8), 761.

Zysman, J., Huberty, M., 2013. Can Green Sustain Growth?: From the Religion to the Reality of Sustainable Prosperity. Stanford University Press.