Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Citations, journal ranking and multiple authorships reconsidered: evidence from almost one million articles

Wohlrabe, Klaus and Sommer, Vera (2016): Citations, journal ranking and multiple authorships reconsidered: evidence from almost one million articles. Forthcoming in: Applied Economics Letters

[img]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_73292.pdf

Download (351kB) | Preview

Abstract

In this paper we reconsider the investigation by \cite{moosa2016} using a much larger data set of almost one million articles listed in RePEc. This article provides new insights into the effects of co-authorship on citation counts and the correlation between quality of papers and quality of the publishing journal. Our evidence is partially in contrast to the results reported in Moosa (2016). We find a positive correlation between the h-index of a journal and the quality of papers measured in terms of citations. This correlation becomes almost perfect using a non-linear model. Results from a regression of citation counts on the number of authors show evidence of a positive and significant effect of co-authorship on the quality of a paper when time effects and large sets of top-cited articles are taken into account. The inclusion of time effects and the large data set, that allows to differentiate between top-cited cohorts, add further insights to the existing literature.

UB_LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.