Karbowski, Adam and Prokop, Jacek (2012): Kontrowersje związane z ekonomicznym uzasadnieniem ochrony patentowej. Published in: Jarecki, W. (red.) Konkurencyjność podmiotów gospodarczych w Polsce, Katedra Mikroekonomii Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin (September 2012): pp. 1-14.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_73619.pdf Download (161kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to show the necessity of reviving the debate on the economic justifications for patent protection. On the one hand, we see the need for the assessment of the overall welfare consequences of the existing systems of patent protection, and on the other hand, we believe that major changes to the patent law should be considered. Critical review of the discussion on patents shows that the weaknesses of many arguments for patent protection, as well as the resulting adverse effects of the patent laws have been know for a long time. The analysis of the strategic behavior of firms shows that patent protection has often been misused and may negatively affect the total welfare.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Kontrowersje związane z ekonomicznym uzasadnieniem ochrony patentowej |
English Title: | Controversies over the economic justifications for patent protection |
Language: | Polish |
Keywords: | patents, intellectual property rights protection, restrictions on competition |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
Item ID: | 73619 |
Depositing User: | A. Karbowski |
Date Deposited: | 11 Sep 2016 11:05 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 07:01 |
References: | Baumol, W., 1990, Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive, The Journal of Political Economy 98, pp. 893-921. Beaulieu, Ch. Le Hardy de, 1862, Discussion sur la propreite des inventions, Journal des Economistes, vol. XXXIV. Bentham, J., 1843, A Manual of Political Economy, Tait, Edinburg. Burns, A. R., 1936, The Decline of Competition, McGraw-Hill, New York. Chapman, Sir S. J., 1911, Outlines of Political Economy, Longmans, Green, London. Clark, J. B., 1927, Essentials of Economic Theory, Macmillan, New York. Cohen W., R. Nelson i J. Walsh (2000): “Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not)”, NBER Working Paper. Coquelin, Ch., 1873, Brevets d’invention”, Dictionnaire de l’Economie Politique, Guillaumin, Paris, p. 213. Crampes, C., Langinier, C., 1998, Information disclosure in the renewal of patents”, Les Annales d’Economie et Statistique, 49/50, pp. 266–288. Doornbos, R., Gras, R., Toth, J., 2003, Usage profile of patent information among current and potential users. Report on the main results of the survey. Edwards, C. D., 1949, Maintaining Competition: Requisites of a Governmental Policy, McGraw-Hill, New York. Ely, R. T., 1914, Property and Contract in Their Relations to the Distribution of Wealth, Macmillan, New York. Fetter, F. A., 1922, Modern Economic Problems, Century, New York. Fisher, I., 1912, Elementary Principles of Economics, Macmillan, New York. Gowdy, J., 2004, Altruism, evolution, and welfare economics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 53, pp. 69-73. Grothe, H., 1877, Das Patentgesetz für das Deutsche Reich, Guttentag, Berlin. Hadley, A. T., 1903, Economics, Putnam, New York. Hayek, F. A., 1944, The Road to Serfdom, Routledge, London. Horstmann I., MacDonald, G. M., Slivinski, A., 1985, Patents as information transfer mechanisms: To patent or (maybe) not to patent, The Journal of Political Economy 93, pp. 837–858. Jakob, L. H., 1837, Grundsätze der Polizeigesetzgebund und der Polizeianstalten, Grunert, Halle. Jobard, J. B. A. M., 1844, Nouvelle économie sociale ou monautopole industriel, artistique, commercial et littéraire, Mathias, Paris. Justi, J. H. G. von, 1758, Staatswirtschaft oder systematische Abhandlung aller ökonomischen und Cameral-Wissenschaften, die zur Regierung eines Landes erfordert werden, Breitkopf, Leipzig. Karbowski, A., 2010, Luka zasobowa w procesie tworzenia innowacji, Organizacja i Kierowanie 140, pp. 75-85. Kahn, A. E., 1940, Fundamental Deficiencies of the American Patent Law, American Economic Review XXX, pp. 475-491. Krauss, A. E. von, 1838, Geist der österreichischen Gesetzgebung zur Aufmunterung der Erfindungen im Fache der Industrie, Mösle und Braumüller, Wien. Langinier, C., 2005, Using patents to mislead rivals, Canadian Journal of Economics 38, pp. 520-545. Lotz, J. F. E., 1822, Handbuch der Staatswirtschaftslehre, Palm & Enke, Erlangen. Lyon, L. S., Watkins, M. W., Abramson, V., 1939, Government and Economic Life, Washington, The Brookings Institution. Machlup, F., 1958, An Economic Review of The Patent System, United States Government Printing Office, Washington. Marshall, A., 1919, Industry and Trade: A Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organization, Macmillan, London. Mill, J. S., 1848, Principles of Political Economics, Parker, London. Mises, L. von, 1949, Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, Yale University Press, New Haven. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, 1883. Penrose, E. T., 1951, The Economics of International Patent System, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore. Plant, A., 1934, The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Inventions, Economica, New Series I, pp. 30-51. Polanyi, M., 1944, Patent Reform, Review of Economic Studies XI, pp. 61-76. Ravenshear, A. F., 1908, The Industrial and Commercial Influence of the English Patent System, Unwin, London. Ricardo, J. L., M. P., 1851, Hearings of the Selected Committee of the House of Lords, The Economist, London, July 26, p. 812. Robbins, L., 1939, The Economic Basis of Class Conflict, Macmillan, London. Robinson, J., 1956, The Accumulation of Capital, Irwin, Homewood. Rogers, KS. J. E. T., 1863, On the Rationale and Working of the Patent Laws, Journal of the Statistical Society of London XXVI, pp. 121-138. Rüster, B. (ed.), 1991, “World Intellectual Property Guidebook: Federal Republic of Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Matthew Bender, New York. Schäffle, A. E., 1867, Die Nationalökonomische Theorie der ausschliessenden Absatzverhältnisse, Laupp, Tübingen. Shavell, S., 2004, Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Simonde De Sismondi, J. C. L., 1827, Nouveaux principles d’économie politique ou de la richesse dans ses rapports avec la population, Delauney Paris. Smith, A., 1776, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London. Spławiński, J., 2005, Patents and ethics: Is it possible to be balanced?”, Science and Engineering Ethics 11, pp. 71-74. Taussig, F. W., 1915, Inventors and Money-Makers, Macmillan, New York. Tirole, J., 1988, The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge. Vaughan, F. L., 1925, Economics of Our Patent System, Macmillan, New York. Wieser, F. von, 1927, Social Economics, Greenberg, New York. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/73619 |