Michaelides, Panayotis G. and Milios, John G. and Vouldis, Angelos (2007): Schumpeter, Lederer and Hilferding on Economic Development, Credit and Business Cycles.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_74472.pdf Download (208kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper compares Joseph Schumpeter, Emil Lederer and Rudolf Hilferding with respect to their visions concerning economic development, technology, credit and business cycles. Their theoretical investigations, in a great number of thematic areas and concepts, seem to converge significantly. For instance, all three used similar arguments to emphasize the link between economic development and technological change. In their analyses, Schumpeter and Lederer referred to psychological factors motivating the entrepreneur, in order to explain the forces that set in motion the process of innovation and thus economic development. Hilferding stressed the importance of technology but mostly with respect to market structure and, more specifically, the emergence of monopolies and cartels. The function of credit is another central theme in the works of all three theoreticians. Besides, they all comprehended in a similar manner the way that credit expansion infuses dynamism into the economic system, creating, thus, on the one hand new growth prospects, and on the other financial and economic instability. Also, regarding the issue of economic crises and fluctuations, all three economists considered them as an endogenous characteristic of the capitalist system and not simply as the result of external factors or shocks. Schumpeter and Lederer argued that business cycles arise from the disruptions created by innovations, which are introduced discontinuously into the economic system, whereas Hilferding focused on the role of disproportionality between sectors producing capital goods and those producing consumer goods. Conclusively, all three writers, in spite of their theoretical differences, have delivered theses which are similar in scope and conclusions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Schumpeter, Lederer and Hilferding on Economic Development, Credit and Business Cycles |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Schumpeter, Lederer, Hilferding, development, technology, credit, business cycles |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B14 - Socialist ; Marxist B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B15 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary |
Item ID: | 74472 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Dr. Panayotis G. Michaelides |
Date Deposited: | 04 Nov 2016 00:01 |
Last Modified: | 12 Oct 2019 05:12 |
References: | Chandler, A., Jr. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Darity, W. A. and Horn, B. L. (1985), Rudolf Hilferding: the dominion of capitalism and the dominion of gold, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 75, pp. 363-368. Haberler, G. (1950), Joseph Alois Schumpeter: 1883-1950, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, pp. 333-72. Hilferding, R. (1910), Finance Capital, London, Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul [1981]. Hilferding, R. (1963), State Capitalism or Totalitarian State Economy, in C.Wright Mills, ed. The Marxists, New York: Dell Publishing Johnson, A. (2000), Memorie, in M. Salvati (ed.) Da Berlino a New York. Milan: Bruno Mondadori, pp. 231–40. Kessler, M. (1961), The Synthetic Vision of Joseph Schumpeter, Review of Politics, July, 23, pp.334-355. Kisch, H. (1979), Joseph Alois Schumpeter, Journal of Economic Issues, 13, 1, pp. 141-57. Lederer, E. and Marschak, J. (1926) Der neue Mittelstand, in Grundriss derSozialoekonomik, Part IX, Das soziale System des Kapitalismus, Tuebingen: Mohr, pp. 120–41. Reprinted in 1937 as The New Middle Class, New York: Columbia University Press. Lederer, E. (1936), Developments in Economic Theory, The American Economic Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Forty-eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, March, pp. 151-160. Lederer, E. (1938), Technical Progress and Unemployment, Geneva: King & son. Lazonick, W. (1990), Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Michaelides, P. and Milios, J. (2005a), Did Hilferding Influence Schumpeter?, History of Economics Review, Vol. 41, Winter, pp. 98-125. Michaelides, P. and Milios, J. (2005b), The Influence of the German Historical School on Schumpeter, European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy, Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference, Bremen, Germany, November 10-12.  Michaelides, P. and Milios, J. (2004), Hilferding’s Influence on Schumpeter: A First Discussion, European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy, Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference, Crete, Greece, October 28-31. Milios, J. (1994), Marx's Theory and the Historic Marxist Controversy on Economic Crisis (1900-1937), Science-and-Society; 58(2), Summer 1994, pp. 175-94. Milios, J., Dimoulis D. and Economakis, G. (2002), Karl Marx and the Classics. An Essay on Value, Crises and the Capitalist Mode of Production, Ashgate, Aldershot. Milios, J. and Sotiropoulos, D. (2005), Gesamtkapitalreproduktion und keynesische Interpretationen von Marx, Tagung : Das Kapital - Marx' Konzeption und Engels' Druckfassung, 21- 23 Oktober, Berlin. Milios, J. and Sotiropoulos, D. (2007), Tugan-Baranowsky and effective demand, Science and Society, Vol. 71, No. 2, April, pp. 227-242. Morgenstern, O. (1951), Joseph A. Schumpeter, 1883-1950, Economic Journal, 61, pp. 197-203 (Rpt. in Oskar Morgenstern, Selected Economic Writings of Oscar Morgenstern, Ed. Andrew Schotter, New York University Press, New York, 1976). Oser, J. and Blanchfield, W. (1975), The Evolution of Economic Thought, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publications, New York. Porter, M. (1985), Competitive Advantage, New York: Free Press. Rosenberg, N. (1982), Inside the Black Box, Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press. Scherer, F. (1984), Innovation and Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Schumpeter, J. A. (1912), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press [1934, 1951, 1961]. Schumpeter, J. A. (1928), The Instability of Capitalism, Economic Journal, Vol. 38, No 151, pp. 361-86. Schumpeter, J. A. (1939), Business Cycles, New York: McGraw-Hill [1964]. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper and Row [1950]. Screpanti, E. and Zamagni, S. (1993), An Outline of the History of Economic Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press [2003]. Sweezy, P. (1949), Karl Marx and the Close of His Systmen by Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk & Böhm-Bawerk’s criticism of Marx by Rudolf Hilferding, New York: Augustus M. Kelley. te Velde, R. A. (2001), Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Development Revised, conference ‘The Future of Innovation Studies’, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, 20-23 September. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/74472 |