Policy Measurement and Multilateral Resistance in Gravity Models

Cipollina, Maria Pina and De Benedictis, Luca and Salvatici, Luca and Vicarelli, Claudio (2016): Policy Measurement and Multilateral Resistance in Gravity Models.

Abstract

Over the past decade, the gravity equation has emerged as the empirical workhorse in international trade to study the ex-post effects of trade policies on bilateral trade. In this paper we are concerned with the issue of how the econometric specification and the policy measurement choices can affect the goal to obtain accurate estimates of the coefficient associated with bilateral trade policies within a theoretically-consistent model. The problem is even more serious when the policy treatment is approximated through dummies as it is still often the case in the literature. Using a Monte Carlo simulation analysis, this paper shows that the use of fixed effects to control for unobserved heterogeneity leads to biased estimates of the policy impact even when the policy is measured through a continuous variable. The bias highlighted by our results is the combination of measurement error about bilateral trade costs (or preferences) and the specification used to proxy multilateral resistance terms.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gravity model; Multilateral trade resistance; Policy evaluation; Monte Carlo Analysis.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C50 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade

References

Anderson, J.E. (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review 69 (1): 106–116.

Anderson, J.E., van Wincoop, E. (2003) Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93 (1): 170-192.

Anderson, J.E., van Wincoop, E. (2004) Trade Costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3): 691-751.

Baier, S., Bergstrand, J. (2009) Estimating the Effects of Free Trade Agreements on International Trade Flows using Matching Econometrics. Journal of International Economics, 77(1): 63–76.

Baldwin, R., Taglioni, D. (2006) Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations. NBER Working Paper 12516.

Baltagi, B.H., Egger, P., Pfaffermayr, M. (2003) A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models. Economic Letters, 80: 391-397.

Baltagi, BH, Egger, PH, Pfaffermayr, M. (2015). Panel data gravity models of international trade. In Baltagi BH (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Panel Data. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 608–641.

Bergstrand, J. (1985) The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 474–481.

Bergstrand, J. H., Egger, P., Larch, M. (2013) Gravity Redux: Estimation of gravity-equation coefficients, elasticities of substitution, and general equilibrium comparative statics under asymmetric bilateral trade costs. Journal of International Economics 89(1): 110-121.

Caliendo, L., Parro, F. (2015) Estimates of the trade and welfare effects of NAFTA. The Review of Economic Studies 82 (1): 1-44,

Cardamone, P. (2011) Preferential Trade Agreements Granted by the European Union: an Application of the Gravity Model Using Monthly Data. European Review of Agricultural Economics 38 (4): 553-586.

Chaney, T. (2008) Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade. The American Economic Review 98 (4): 1707–21.

Cipollina, M., Pietrovito, F. (2011) Trade Impact of EU Preferential Policies: a Meta-analysis of the Literature, in Luca De Benedictis and Luca Salvatici (Eds.), The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential policies: an Analysis through gravity models, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.

Cipollina, M., Salvatici, L. (2010) The Impact of European Union Agricultural Preferences. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13 (1): 87-106.

Cipollina, M., Laborde, D., Salvatici, L. (2016). The tide that does not raise all boats: An assessment of EU preferential trade policies. Review of World Economics, pp.1-33, DOI 10.1007/s10290-016-0270-0

De Benedictis, L., Taglioni, D. (2011) The Gravity Model in International Trade, in Luca De Benedictis and Luca Salvatici (Eds.), The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential policies: an Analysis through gravity models, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.

De Benedictis, L., Salvatici, L., eds (2011), The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential policies: an Analysis through gravity models, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

De Benedictis, L., Vicarelli, C. (2005) Trade Potential in Gravity Data Models. Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy, 5, (1).

Eaton, J., Kortum, S. (2002) Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica 70 (5): 1741–1779.

Egger, P., Pfaffermayr, M. (2003) The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics 28: 571–580.

Egger, P., Staub, K. E. (2016) GLM Estimation of Trade Gravity Models with Fixed Effects, Empirical Economics 50 (1): 137–175

Fally, T. (2015) Structural Gravity and Fixed Effects Journal of International Economics 97 78-85

Feenstra, R.C. (2002) Border effects and the gravity equation: Consistent methods for estimation. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49 (5): 491–506

Feenstra, R.C. (2004) Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, ch.3.

Head, K.,Mayer, T. (2014) Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook, in the Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 4, eds. Gopinath, Helpman, and Rogoff, Elsevier.

Head, K., Mayer, T., Ries, J. (2010) The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics, 81(1): 1-14

Head, K., Ries, J. (2001) Increasing Returns Versus National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of U.S.-Canada Trade. American Economic Review 91 (4): 858-876

Heckman, J.(1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47: 153-61.

Helpman, E., Melitz, M., Rubinstein, Y. (2008) Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2): 441–487.

Hornok, C. (2011) Gravity or Dummies? The Limits of Identification in Gravity Estimations, CeFiG Working Papers 15.

Hummels, D. (2001).Toward a Geography of Trade Costs. Unpublished manuscript, available at http://www.krannert.purdue.edu/faculty/hummelsd/research/toward/TGTC.pdf.

Leamer, E.E., Levinsohn, J. (1995) International Trade Theory: The Evidence, in G. Grossman and K. Rogoff, (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol III, 1995, pp. 1339-1394

Martin, W., Pham, C. (2014) Estimating the Gravity Model When Zero Trade Flows Are Frequent and economically determined, Mimeo.

Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2013) The log of gravity revisited. Applied Economics 45(3): 311-327.

Màtyàs, L. (1997) Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model. The World Economy, 20(3): 363-368.

Novy, D. (2013) Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs With Panel Data. Economic Inquiry, 51(1): 101–121.

Olivero, M.P., Yotov. V. Y. (2012) Dynamic Gravity: Endogenous Country Size and Asset Accumulation.Canadian Journal of Economics, 45(1): 64–92.

Piermartini, R., Yotov, V.Y. (2016). Estimating Trade Policy Effects with Structural Gravity. LeBow College of Business, Drexel University School of Economics Working Paper Series WP 2016-10.

Tinbergen, J. (1962) Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, The Twentieth Century Fund, New York.

Santos Silva, J.C. M., Tenreyro, S. (2006) The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88: 641-58.

Santos Silva, J.C. M., Tenreyro, S. (2011) Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator. Economics Letters 112: 220-222.

Stack, M. M. (2009), Regional Integration and Trade: Controlling for Varying Degrees of Heterogeneity in the Gravity Model. The World Economy, 32(5): 772-789.

Wei, S. J. (1996) Intra-National versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration? NBER Working Papers No 5531.