Biased Technical Change and Economic Growth : The Case of Korea, 1970-2013

Jeong, Sangjun (2016): Biased Technical Change and Economic Growth : The Case of Korea, 1970-2013.

Abstract

This paper explores the pattern of technical change in the Korean economy from 1970 to 2013 and investigates its determinants. We use the Classical growth-distribution schedule to show that the labor-saving and capital-using pattern has predominated. For the rationale behind this Marx-biased technical change (“MBTC”), we focus on the relationship between technical change and real wage growth via the evolution of labor and capital productivity, and verify the historical direction of technical change against the rise and fall of the working class. Furthermore, we find that the deviation during the post-crisis period from the long-run trend of MBTC is not attributable to the vitality of new technological innovations, but rather the reflection of class dynamics over extracting productivity under weaker capital deepening. The results suggest that the recent deterioration of labor share and labor unions in Korea is closely associated with low incentive for technological progress, which contributes to prolonged stagnation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: growth-distribution schedule, Marx-biased technical change, labor productivity, capital productivity
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian; N - Economic History > N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics ; Industrial Structure ; Growth ; Fluctuations > N15 - Asia including Middle East; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes

References

Acemoglu, D. (2010). When does labor scarcity encourage innovation? Journal of Political Economy, 118(6), 1037-78.

Allen, R. (2011). Why the industrial revolution was British: commerce, induced invention, and the scientific revolution. The Economic History Review, 64(2), 357–84.

Aoyagi, C. & Ganelli, G. (2013). The path to higher growth: does revamping Japan’s dual labor market matter? Working Paper 13/202, International Monetary Fund.

Bank of Korea (2015). National balance sheet accounts. (ecos.bok.or.kr).

Basu, D. (2010). Marx-biased technical change and the neoclassical view of income distribution. Metroeconomica, 61(4), 593-620.

Bildirici, M. & Alp, E.A. (2008). The relationship between wages and productivity: TAR unit root and TAR cointegration approach. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 5(1), 93-110.

Cassetti, M. (2003). Bargaining power, effective demand and technical progress: a Kaleckian model of growth, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(3), 449-64.

Chun, H., Miyagawa, T., Pyo H.K., & Tonogi, K. (2015). Do intangibles contribute to productivity growth in East Asian countries? evidence from Japan and Korea. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 15-E-055.

da Silva, E. A. (1991). The wage-profit curve in Brazil: an input-output model with fixed capital, 1975. Review of Radical Political Economics, 23(1-2), 104-10.

de Souza, J.P.A. (2014). Real wages and labor-saving technical change: evidence from a panel of manufacturing industries in mature and labor-surplus economics. Working Paper-03. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Drandrakis, E. & Phelps, E. (1966). A model of induced invention, growth, and distribution, Economic Journal, 76, 823-40.

Duménil, G. & Lévy. D. (1995). A stochastic model of technical change: an application to the US Economy. Metroeconomica, 46(3), 213-45.

Duménil, G. & Lévy. D. (2003). Technology and distribution: Historical Trajectories à la Marx. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 52(2), 201-33.

Easterly, W. & Levine, R. (2001). What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? It's not factor accumulation: stylized facts and growth models. World Bank Economic Review, 15(2), 177-219.

Felipe, J., Laviña, E. & Fan.E.X. (2008). The diverging patterns of profitability, investment and growth of China and India during 1980-2003. World Development, 36(5), 741-74.

Felipe, J. & McCombie, J.S.L. (2013). The aggregate production function and the measurement of technical change: ‘not even wrong’. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Ferretti, F. (2008). Patterns of technical change: a geometrical analysis using the wage-profit rate schedule. International Review of Applied Economics, 22(5), 565-83.

Fine, B. & Dimakou, O. (2016). Macroeconomics: A Critical Companion, London: Pluto press.

Foley, D. K. & Marquetti, A. (1999). Productivity, employment and growth in European integration. Metroeconomica, 50(3), 277-300.

Foley, D. K. & Michl, T.R. (1999). Growth and distribution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Foster, J.B. & McChesney, R.W. (2012). The Endless Crisis: How Monopoly-Finance Capital Produces Stagnation and Upheaval from the U.S.A. to China, New York: Monthly Review Press.

Gollin, D. (2002). Getting income shares right. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 458-474.

Green, F. (2004). Why has work effort become more Intense? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 43(4), 709–741.

Groll, S. & Orzech, Z.B. (1990). Marx's social dynamics and neutral technical progress: a contradiction? Australian Economic Papers, 29(54), 85-100.

Gujarati, D. (2011). Econometrics by example, Palgrave Macmillan.

Hart-Landsberg, M., Jeong, S.-J. & Westra, R. (eds.) (2007). Marxist perspectives on South Korea in the global economy, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Hein, E. (2008). Money, distribution conflict and capital accumulation: contributions to 'monetary analysis', Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hein, E. & Tarassow, A. (2010). Distribution, aggregate demand and productivity growth: theory and empirical results for six OECD countries based on a post-Kaleckian model. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(4), 727-754.

Hölzl, W. (2010). Was there a Marxian bias in Austrian manufacturing? evidence on the direction of technical change, 1978-1994. International Review of Applied Economics, 24(1), 35-56.

Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models, Econometrica, 59(6), 1551-80.

Kennedy, C. (1964). Induced bias in innovation and the theory of distribution. The Economic Journal, 74(295), 541-47.

Krugman, P.(1994). The myth of Asia’s miracle. Foreign Affairs, 73(6), 62-78.

Kumar, S., Webber, D.J. and Perry, G. (2012). Real wages, inflation and labour productivity in Australia. Applied Economics, 44(23), 2945-54.

Kurz, H. (2010). Technical progress, capital accumulation and income distribution in Classical economics: Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(5), 1183-1222.

Lee, K., Lin, J.Y. & Chang, H.-J. (2005), Late marketisation versus late industrialisation in east Asia. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 19(1), 42-59.

Lucas, R.E.Jr. (1993). Making a miracle. Econometrica, 61(2), 251-272.

Lucidi, F. & Kleinknecht, A. (2010). Little innovation, many jobs: an econometric analysis of the Italian labour productivity crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(3), 525–46.

Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis, Berlin: Springer.

Marquetti, A. (2003). Analyzing historical and regional patterns of technical change from a Classical-Marxian perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52, 191-200.

Marquetti, A. (2004). Do rising real wages increase the rate of labor-saving technical change?: some econometric evidence. Metroeconomica, 55(4), 432-441.

Mendoza, G. (2007). Economic growth models and growth tendencies in major Latin American countries and in the United States, 1963-2003. Investigación Económica, 66( 262), 59-87.

Michl, T. (1992). Capital and labor productivity, Review of Radical Political Economics, 24(2): 45-50.

Mohun, S. (2009). Aggregate capital productivity in the US economy, 1964-2001. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(5), 1023-46.

Naastepad, C.W.M. (2006). Technology, demand, and distribution: a cumulative growth model with an application to the Dutch productivity slowdown. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(3), 403–34.

Ochoa, E. (1989). Value, prices and wage-profit curves in the U.S. economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13(3), 413-29.

OECD. (2015). OECD Compendium of productivity indicators, Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2013). Stengthening social cohesion in Korea, Paris: OECD Publishing.

Ra, Y.-S. & Shim, K.-W. (2009). The Korean case study: past experience and new trends in training policies. World Bank SPas Discussion paper, no.0931.

Schoder, C. (2012). Endogenous capital productivity in the Kaleckian growth model. theory and evidence, Working Paper 102, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.

Seguino, S. (2000). The investment function revisited: disciplining capital in South Korea. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 22(2), 313-338.

Stockhammer, E. (2004). Financialisation and the slowdown of accumulation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(5):719-741.

Storm, S. & Naastepad, C.W.M. (2013). Wage-led or profit-led supply: wages, productivity and investment, in Lavoie M. & Stockhammer, E. (eds.), Wage-led growth-an equitable strategy for economic recovery, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tsoulfidis, L. & Rieu, D.-M. (2006). Labor values, prices of production, and wage-profit rate frontiers of the Korean economy. Seoul Journal of Economics, 19, 275-95.

Vaona, A. (2011). Profit rate dynamics, income distribution, structural and technical change in Denmark, Finland and Italy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 22(3), 247-268.

Vergeer, R. & Kleinknecht, A. (2010-11). The impact of labor market deregulation on productivity: a panel data analysis of 19 OECD countries (1960-2004). Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 33(2), 371-408.

You, J.-I. (1994). Macroeconomic structure, endogenous technical change and growth, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(2), 213-33.

You, J.-I. & Chang H.-J. (1993). The myth of free labour market in Korea. Contributions to Political Economy, 12(1), 29-46.

Young, A. (1995). The tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the east Asian growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 641-80.