A note on CES Preferences in Age-Structured Models

Da-Rocha, Jose-Maria and García-Cutrin, Javier and Gutierrez, Maria Jose and Touza, Julia (2016): A note on CES Preferences in Age-Structured Models.

Abstract

In a biomass model a CES function generates an exploitation rate that is directly proportional to the scarcity of the resource: resources with less biomass are subjected to lower exploitation rates. In this paper we investigate the implications of introducing invariant intertemporal preferences as to yield stability in age-structured fishery problem. Our results show that a CES function in an age-structured bioeconomic model produces links between the scarcity of the resource (measured as the weighted sum of the size of the cohorts, which is similar to the Shannon index) and the exploitation of the resource over a complete cycle, the duration of which is equivalent to the number of age groups of the resource. Given that multiple paths can be constructed that regenerate the population of the resources (the age pyramid) over the course of the cycle, optimum harvest allocation means selecting the one that permits the biggest catch at the beginning of the cycle. Smoother exploitation path towards the stationary values are achieved by catching more in periods when there is less biomass in exchange for catching less when the biomass recovers, which results in exploitation rates that are not directly proportional to the scarcity of the resource. Moreover, we show that introducing non-constant discount rates into age-structured models enables exploitation rates proportional to the scarcity of the resource to be recouped

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Optimisation in age-structure models, Stability preferences, Natural resource management, Constant-elasticity-of-substitution utility function
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics

References

Aanesen, M., Armstrong, C., Bloomfield, H.J., and C., R. (2014). What does stakeholder involvement mean for fisheries management? Ecology and Society, 19(4): 35.

Baudron, A., Ulrich, C., Nielsen, J.R., and Boje, J. (2010). Comparative evaluation of a mixed-fisheries effort-management system based on the faroe islands example. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67(5):1036-1050.

Da-Rocha, J.M., Garcia-Cutrin, J., Gutierrez, M.J., and Touza, J. (2016). Reconciling yield stability with international fisheries agencies precautionary preferences: the role of non constant discount factors in age structured models. Fisheries Research, 173:282-293.

DaRocha, J.M., Gutierrez, M.J., and Antelo, L.T. (2012). Pulse vs optimal stationary fishing: The northern stock of hake. Fisheries Research, 121-122:51-62.

DaRocha, J.M., Gutierrez, M.J., and Antelo, L.T. (2013). Selectivity, pulse fishing and endogenous lifespan in Beverton-Holt models. Environmental Resource Economics, 54(1):139-154.

Deepak, K.R., GerberJames, S., MacDonald, G.K., and West, P.C. (2015). Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability. Nature Communications, 6:5989.

Dichmont, C.M., Pascoe, S.K., Punt, T., E., A., and Deng, R. (2010). On implementing maximum economic yield in commercial fisheries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(1):16-21.

Goetz, R., Hritonenko, N., Mur, R., Xabadia, A., and Yatsenko, Y. (2010). Forest management and carbon sequestration in size-structured forests: the case of pinus sylvestris in spain. Forest Science, 56:242-256.

Holland, D.S. and Herrera, G.E. (2012). The impact of age structure, uncertainty, and asymmetric spatial dynamics on regulatory performance in a fishery metapopulation. Ecological Economics, 77(C):207-218.

Kasperski, S. and Holland, D.S. (2013). Income diversification and risk for fishermen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(6):2076-2081.

Kell, L., Pilling, G., Kirkwood, G., Pastoors, M., Mesnil, B., Korsbrekke, K., Abaunza, P., Aps, R., Biseau, A., Kunzlik, P., Needle, C., Roel, B., and Ulrich, C. (2006). An evaluation of multi-annual management strategies for ices roundfish stocks. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 63(1):12-24.

Kronbak, L. and Vestergaard, N. (2013). Environmental cost-effectiveness analysis in intertemporal natural resource policy: evaluation of selective fishing gear. Journal of Environmental Management, 131:270-279.

Kuuluvainen, T., Tahvonen, O., and Aakala, T. (2012). Even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in boreal fennoscandia: a review. Ambio, 41(7):720-737.

Lassen, H. and Medley, P. (2000). Virtual population analysis. A Practical Manual for Stock Assessment. {FAO} Fisheries Technical Paper, 400.

McGough, B., Plantinga, J.A., and Costello, C. (2009). Optimally managing a stochastic renewable resource under general economic conditions. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 9(1):1-31.

Pascoe, S., Proctor, W., Wilcox, C., Innes, J., Rochester, W., and Dowling, N. (2009). Stakeholder objective preferences in australian commonwealth managed fisheries. Marine Policy, 33(5):750-758.

Penas, E. (2007). The fishery conservation policy of the European Union after 2002: towards long-term sustainability. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64:588-595.

Price, M. and Price, C. (2006). Creaming the best, or creatively transforming? might felling the biggest trees first be a win-win strategy. Forest Ecology and Management, 224:297-303.

Pukkala, T., Lähde, E., and Laiho, S. (2010). Optimizing the structure and management of uneven-sized stands of finland. Forestry, 84:129-142.

Quaas, M.F. and Requate, T. (2013). Sushi or fish fingers? seafood diversity, collapsing fish stocks, and multispecies fishery management. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(2):381-422.

Ravn Jonsen, L. (2011). Intertemporal choice of marine ecosystem exploitation. Ecological Economics, 70:1726-1734.

Sampedro, P., Prellezo, R., García, D., Da-Rocha, J.M., Cerviño, S., Torralba, J., Touza, J., Garcia-Cutrin, J., and Gutierrez, M.J. (2016). To shape or to be shaped: engaging stakeholders in fishery management advice. ICES Journal of Marine Science, In Press.

Tahvonen, O. (2009). Economics of harvesting age-structured fish populations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(3):281-299.

Tahvonen, O. (2015). Economics of naturally regenerating, heterogeneous forests. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2(2):309-337.

Touza, J., Termansen, M., and Perrings, C. (2008). A bioeconomic approach to the faustmann-hartman rule: ecological interactions and even-aged forest management. Natural Resource Modeling, 21(4):551- 581.

Woods, P., Bourchard, C., Holland, D., Punt, A., and Marteinsdottir, G. (2015). Catch-quota balancing mechanisms in the icelandic multi-species demersal fishery: are all species equal. Marine Policy, 55:1-10.