Public funding of parties and political polarization

Köppl Turyna, Monika (2015): Public funding of parties and political polarization.

Abstract

This work analyzes the impact of asymmetric financial constraints on the platforms of parties, using a formal model of elections. The main results show that when a party faces a tight financial constraint, the platform chosen in equilibrium is further away from its ideal point compared with the case when campaign expenses are unlimited. Moreover, we show that in the presence of asymmetric budget constraints, a financially advantaged party converges to the median voter and a disadvantaged one diverges away. The strength of the latter effect depends on the salience of the policy issue in question. The results are tested by using a dataset of party positions and salience and confirm the theoretical predictions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: campaign finance, polarization, endogenous valence, public funding
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation

References

Austin, R. and Tjernstrom, M., editors (2003). Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm.

Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006). Party Policy in Modern Democracies. Routledge Chapman & Hall, London.

Bryan, S. and Baer, D., editors (2005). Money in Politics: A Study of Party Financing Practices in 22 Countries. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Washington.

Desmet, K., Ortuno Ortin, I., and Wacziarg, R. (2009). The Political Economy of Ethnolinguistic Cleavages. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 7478, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

Gallagher, M. (1991). Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems. Electoral Studies, 10:33-51.

GRECO (2007). Evaluation Report on Slovenia on Transparency of Party Funding. Council of Europe.

GRECO (2008a). Evaluation Report on Luxembourg on the Transparency of Political Party Funding. Council of Europe.

GRECO (2008b). Evaluation Report on the United Kingdom on Transparency of Party Funding. Council of Europe.

GRECO (2010a). Evaluation Report on Greece on Transparency of Party Funding. Council of Europe.

GRECO (2010b). Evaluation Report on Turkey on Transparency of Party Funding. Council of Europe.

Herrera, H., Levine, D. K., and Martinelli, C. (2008). Policy platforms, campaign spending and voter participation. Journal of Public Economics, 92:501 - 513.

Ikstens, J., Smilov, D., and Walecki, M. (2001). Party and campaign funding in Eastern Europe: A study of 18 member countries of the ACEEEO. Paper presented at the ACEEEO annual conference "Transparent Election Campaign Financing in the 21st Century" in Brijuni, Croatia.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430, The World Bank, Washington.

Kleibergen, F. (2002). Pivotal statistics for testing structural parameters in instrumental variables regression. Econometrica, 70:1781-1803.

Koeppl-Turyna, M. (2014). Campaign finance regulations and policy convergence: The role of interest groups and valence. European Journal of Political Economy, 33:1-19.

Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12:3-27.

Masket, S. E. and Miller, M. G. (2015). Does public election funding create more extreme legislators? Evidence from Arizona and Maine. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 15(1):24-40.

Ortuno Ortin, I. and Schultz, C. (2005). Public Funding of Political Parties. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 7:781-791.

Ortuno Ortin, I. and Schultz, C. (2012). Public funding of political parties when campaigns are informative. EPRU Working Paper Series 2012-05, Copenhagen.

Paap, R. (2006). Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Econometrics, 133:97-126.

Schaffer, M. and Stillman, S. (2010). xtoverid: Stata module to calculate tests of overidentifying restrictions after xtreg, xtivreg, xtivreg2 and xthtaylor. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456779.html.

Troumpounis, O. (2012). On the distribution of public funding to political parties. Economics Letters, 116(3):367 - 370.

Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Merz, N., Regel, S., and Werner, A. (2014). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2014a. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung, Berlin. with Lacewell, Onawa Promise / Schultze, Henrike.