Globalization and the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Making a Rules-based Trading Regime Work

Khan, Haider and Liu, Yibei (2008): Globalization and the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Making a Rules-based Trading Regime Work.

Abstract

We discuss thje role of the dispute settlement mechanism (DSM) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in the context of a complex characterization of globalization.The dispute settlement mechanism (DSM) of the World Trade Organization (WTO) is at present a controversial exercise at the international level. Reasonable people disagree as to whether it has enhanced and maintained equality between developing and developed countries. Through examining its concrete provisions, procedures and several important factors such as resource availability and political influence outside the WTO, it can be found that there are conditions under which the new rule-based DSM can indeed contribute to promoting developing countries’ status in the system . Consequently, it can provide them with more power to defend their own interests. However, the DSM still does not eliminate the power-based relationships among countries. Developing countries are still affected by biases, which stem from several sources such as high financial and legal resource costs, political pressure generated outside the WTO, declarative WTO legal provisions, etc..A reformed WTO with less asymmetry of power will result in a higher level of global social welfare.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: dispute settlement mechanism (DSM),World Trade Organization (WTO) ,Globalization
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General

References

Alter, Karen J.. “Resolving or Exacerbating Disputes? The WTO’s Nes Dispute Resolution System.” International Affairs, 79, no.4 (2003): 783-800.

Besson, Fabien and Racem Mehdi. “Is WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased Against Developing Countries? An Empirical Analysis.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Policy Modeling, Paris, France, June 30 – July 2, 2004.

Bown, Chad P.. “Developing Countries as Plaintiffs and Defendants in GATT/WTO Trade Disputes.” The World Economy 27, no.1 (2004): 59-80.

--------. “Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainant, Interested Parties, and Free Riders.” World Bank Economic Review 19, no.2 (2005): 287-310

--------. “Trade Policy under the GATT/WTO Empirical Evidence of the Equal Treatment Rule.” Canadian Journal of Economics 37, no.3 (2004): 678-720.

-------- and Bernard M. Hoekman. “WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector.” Journal of International Economic Law 8, no.4 (2005): 861-890.

Busch, Marc L. and Eric Reinhardt. “Developing Countries and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/ World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement.” Journal of World Trade 37, no.4 (2003): 719-735.

Cameron, James and Karen Campbell. Dispute Resolution in the WTO. London: Cameron May, 1998.

Davey, William J.. “The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The First Ten Years.” Journal of International Economic Law 8, no.1 (2005): 17-50.

Hoekman, Bernard M. and Will Martin, ed. Developing Countries and the WTO: A Pro-active Agenda. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 2001.

--------, Aaditya Mattoo and Philip English ed. Development, Trade, and the WTO: A Handbook. Washington: The World Bank, 2002.

Holmes, Peter, Jim Rollo and Alasdair R. Young. “Emerging Trends in WTO Dispute Settlement: Back to the GATT?.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3133, September 2003.

Jackson, John H. “Dispute Settlement and the WTO: Emerging Problems.” Journal of International Economic Law 1, no.3 (1998): 329-351.

--------. The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Khan, Haider A. Global Markets and Financial Crises in Asia: Towards a Theory for the 21st Century, Palgrave/Macmillan, 2004 --------, China’s Entry into WTO, CIRJE discussion paper no. --------, Globalization, CIRJE discussion paper no.

Lacarte-Muro, Julio and Petina Gappah, “Developing Countries and the WTO Legal and Dispute Settlement System: A View From the Bench.” Journal of International Economic Law 3, no.3 (2000): 395-401

Lida, Keisuke. “Is WTO Dispute Settlement Effective?.” Global Governance 10 (2004): 207-225.

Michalopoulos, Constantine. “The Developing Countries in the WTO.” The World Economy 22, no.1 (1999): 117-143.

Moon, Don. “Equality and Inequality in the WTO Dispute Settlement (DS) System: Analysis of the GATT/WTO Dispute Data.” International Interactions 32, no. 3 (2006): 201-228.

Narlikar, Amrita. The World Trade Organization: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 2005.

Perdikis, Nicholas and Robert Read. The WTO and the Regulations of International Trade. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2005.

Salas, Mauricio and John H. Jackson. “Procedural Overview of the WTO EC – Banana Dispute.” Journal of International Economic Law 3 (2000): 145-166.

Shaffer, Gregory. “The Challenges of WTO Law: Strategies for Developing Country Adaptation.” World Trade Review 5, no.2 (2006): 177-198.

Smith, James. “Inequality in International Trade? Developing Countries and Institutional Change in WTO Dispute Settlement.” Review of International Political Economy 11, no.3 (2004): 542-573.

Tandon, Yash and Megan Allardice. Paved with Good Intentions: Background to the GATT, Uruguay Round and WTO. Newlands: SEATINI, 2004.

Zejan, Pilar and Frank L. Bartels. “Be Nice and Get Your Money – An Empirical Analysis of World Trade Organization Trade Disputes and Aid.” Journal of World Trade 40, no.6 (2006): 1021-1047.