Is faster economic growth compatible with reductions in carbon emissions? The role of diminished population growth

Casey, Gregory and Galor, Oded (2017): Is faster economic growth compatible with reductions in carbon emissions? The role of diminished population growth. Published in: Environmental Research Letters , Vol. 12, No. 1 (5 January 2017)

Abstract

We provide evidence that lower fertility can simultaneously increase income per capita and lower carbon emissions, eliminating a trade-off central to most policies aimed at slowing global climate change. We estimate the effect of lower fertility on carbon emissions, accounting for the fact that changes in fertility patterns affect carbon emissions through three channels: total population, the age structure of the population, and economic output. Our analysis proceeds in two steps. First, we estimate the elasticity of carbon emissions with respect to population and income per capita in an unbalanced yearly panel of cross-country data from 1950–2010. We demonstrate that the elasticity with respect to population is nearly seven times larger than the elasticity with respect to income per capita and that this difference is statistically significant. Thus, the regression results imply that 1% slower population growth could be accompanied by an increase in income per capita of nearly 7% while still lowering carbon emissions. In the second part of our analysis, we use a recently constructed economic-demographic model of Nigeria to estimate the effect of lower fertility on carbon emissions, accounting for the impacts of fertility on population growth, population age structure, and income per capita. We find that by 2100 C.E. moving from the medium to the low variant of the UN fertility projection leads to 35% lower yearly emissions and 15% higher income per capita. These results suggest that population policies could be part of the approach to combating global climate change.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Climate Change, Demography, Economic Growth
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J11 - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General

References

[1] M. R. Raupach, G. Marland, P. Ciais, C. Le Qu´er´e, J. G. Canadell, G. Klepper, and C. B. Field, “Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 24, pp. 10288–10293, 2007.

[2] B. C. O’Neill, B. Liddle, L. Jiang, K. R. Smith, S. Pachauri, M. Dalton, and R. Fuchs, “Demographic change and carbon dioxide emissions,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9837, pp. 157–164, 2012.

[3] B. C. O’Neill, M. Dalton, R. Fuchs, L. Jiang, S. Pachauri, and K. Zigova, “Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, no. 41, pp. 17521–17526, 2010.

[4] W. D. Nordhaus, A Question of Balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, 2014.

[5] T. Dietz and E. A. Rosa, “Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 175–179, 1997.

[6] R. York, E. A. Rosa, and T. Dietz, “STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts,” Ecological Economics, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 351–365, 2003.

[7] B. Liddle, “What are the carbon emissions elasticities for income and population? bridging STIRPAT and EKC via robust heterogeneous panel estimates,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 31, pp. 62–73, 2015.

[8] B. Alcott, “Impact caps: why population, affluence and technology strategies should be abandoned,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 552–560, 2010.

[9] Q. H. Ashraf, D. N. Weil, and J. Wilde, “The effect of fertility reduction on economic growth,” Population and Development Review, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 97–130, 2013.

[10] J. Brunn´ee and C. Streck, “The UNFCCC as a negotiation forum: towards common but more differentiated responsibilities,” Climate Policy, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 589–607, 2013.

[11] United Nations, “Adoption of The Paris Agreement.” https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf, 2015.

[12] J. E. Aldy, R. N. Stavins, et al., “Climate negotiators create an opportunity for scholars,” Science, vol. 337, no. 6098, pp. 1043–1044, 2012.

[13] R. N. Stavins, “The problem of the commons: still unsettled after 100 years,” American Economic Review, pp. 81–108, 2011.

[14] W. Nordhaus, “Climate clubs: overcoming free-riding in international climate policy,” American Economic Review, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1339–1370, 2015.

[15] B. Liddle, “Impact of population, age structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions/energy consumption: evidence from macro-level, cross-country analyses,” Population and Environment, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 286–304, 2014.

[16] M. Dalton, B. O’Neill, A. Prskawetz, L. Jiang, and J. Pitkin, “Population aging and future carbon emissions in the united states,” Energy Economics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 642–675, 2008.

[17] J. P. Holdren and P. R. Ehrlich, “Human population and the global environment: population growth, rising per capita material consumption, and disruptive technologies have made civilization a global ecological force,” American Scientist, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 282–292, 1974.

[18] M. R. Chertow, “The IPAT equation and its variants,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 13–29, 2000.

[19] A. K. Jorgenson and B. Clark, “Assessing the temporal stability of the population/environment relationship in comparative perspective: a cross-national panel study of carbon dioxide emissions, 1960–2005,” Population and Environment, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 27–41, 2010.

[20] B. Liddle, “Consumption-driven environmental impact and age structure change in OECD countries: A cointegration-stirpat analysis,” Demographic Research, vol. 24, pp. 749–770, 2013.

[21] T. A. Boden, G. Marland, and R. J. Andres, “Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions,” Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA doi, vol. 10, 2015.

[22] R. C. Feenstra, R. Inklaar, and M. P. Timmer, “The next generation of the Penn World Table,” American Economic Review, vol. 105, no. 10, pp. 3150–82, 2015.

[23] M.Wagner, “The carbon Kuznets curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics?,” Resource and Energy Economics, vol. 30, pp. 388–408, 2008.

[24] A. K. Jorgenson and B. Clark, “The relationship between national-level carbon dioxide emissions and population size: an assessment of regional and temporal variation, 1960–2005,” PLOS ONE, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e57107, 2013.

[25] K. W. Knight, E. A. Rosa, and J. B. Schor, “Could working less reduce pressures on the environment? a cross-national panel analysis of oecd countries, 1970–2007,” Global Environmental Change, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 691–700, 2013.

[26] B. Liddle and S. Lung, “Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: revisiting stirpat for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts,” Population and Environment, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 317–343, 2010.

[27] United Nations, “World population prospects: The 2015 revision, dvd edition,” 2015.

[28] W. D. Nordhaus, The Climate Casino: Risk, uncertainty, and economics for a warming world. Yale University Press, 2013.

[29] M. Golosov, J. Hassler, P. Krusell, and A. Tsyvinski, “Optimal taxes on fossil fuel in general equilibrium,” Econometrica, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 41–88, 2014.

[30] M. Cazorla and M. Toman, “International equity and climate change policy,” Resources for the Future Climate Issue Brief, no. 27, 2000.

[31] D. Gillespie, S. Ahmed, A. Tsui, and S. Radloff, “Unwanted fertility among the poor: an inequity?,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 100–107, 2007.

[32] W. D. Nordhaus, “Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, no. 26, pp. 11721–11726, 2010.

[33] G. S. Becker, “An economic analysis of fertility,” NBER Chapters, pp. 209–240, 1960.

[34] O. Galor, Unified Growth Theory. Princeton University Press, 2011.

[35] O. Galor, “The demographic transition: causes and consequences,” Cliometrica, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1– 28, 2012.

[36] H. Bleakley and F. Lange, “Chronic disease burden and the interaction of education, fertility, and growth,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 52–65, 2009.

[37] D. Aaronson, F. Lange, and B. Mazumder, “Fertility transitions along the extensive and intensive margins,” American Economic Review, vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 3701–3724, 2014.

[38] G. Marland and R. M. Rotty, “Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels: a procedure for estimation and results for 1950–1982,” Tellus B, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 232–261, 1984.

[39] R. C. Feenstra, R. Inklaar, and M. Timmer, PWT 8.0–a user guide, 2013.

[40] C. Baum, M. Schaffer, and S. Stillman, “ivreg2: Stata Module for Extended Instrumental Variables/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML, and k-class Regression.” http://ideas.repec. org/c/boc/bocode/s425401.html, 2010.

[41] United Nations, “World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision,” 2010.