Kemp-Benedict, Eric (2017): Biased technological change and Kaldor’s stylized facts.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_76803.pdf Download (673kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper presents a theory of biased technological change in which firms pursue a random, local, search for productivity-enhancing innovations. They implement profitable innovations at fixed prices, subsequently adjusting prices and wages. Factor productivity growth rates are shown to respond positively to factor cost shares. Combined with price-setting behavior, an equilibrium is characterized by constant cost shares and productivity growth rates. Under target-return pricing, capital productivity growth is zero at equilibrium, yielding Kaldor’s “stylized facts” of constant capital productivity and rate of profit. Equilibrium can be disturbed by changes in the pricing regime or technological potential for productivity improvement.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Biased technological change and Kaldor’s stylized facts |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | post-Keynesian; biased technological change; induced technological change |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E14 - Austrian ; Evolutionary ; Institutional O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 76803 |
Depositing User: | Eric Kemp-Benedict |
Date Deposited: | 15 Feb 2017 17:14 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 11:17 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131 Berndt, E. R., & Wood, D. O. (1975). Technology, prices, and the derived demand for energy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 57(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/1923910 Coutts, K., & Norman, N. (2013). Post-Keynesian approaches to industrial pricing. In G. C. Harcourt & P. Kriesler (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume 1: Theory and Origins. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.ezp.sub.su.se/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390766.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195390766-e-019 Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (1995). A stochastic model of technical change: An application to the US economy (1869–1989). Metroeconomica, 46(3), 213–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.1995.tb00380.x Foley, D. K. (2003). Unholy Trinity: Labor, Capital, and Land in the New Economy. London; New York: Routledge. Goulder, L. H., & Schneider, S. H. (1999). Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies. Resource and Energy Economics, 21(3–4), 211–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(99)00004-4 Gritsevskyi, A., & Nakićenović, N. (2000). Modeling uncertainty of induced technological change. Energy Policy, 28(13), 907–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00082-3 Hicks, J. R. (1932). The Theory of Wages. London: MacMillan and Company Limited. Kaldor, N. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. In F. A. Lutz & D. Hague (Eds.), The Theory of Capital (pp. 177–222). Macmillan and Co. Ltd. Kennedy, C. (1964). Induced bias in innovation and the theory of distribution. The Economic Journal, 74(295), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228295 Kumar, S., & Managi, S. (2009). Energy price-induced and exogenous technological change: Assessing the economic and environmental outcomes. Resource and Energy Economics, 31(4), 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.05.001 Maddison, A. (1994). Standardised Estimates of Fixed Capital Stock: A Six Country Comparison (GGDC Research Memorandum No. GGDC Research Memorandum 199409). Groningen, Netherlands: Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/rugggd/199409.html Okishio, N. (1961). Technical changes and the rate of profit. Kobe University Economic Review, 7, 86–99. Okishio, N. (2001). Competition and production prices. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25(4), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/25.4.493 Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-first Century. (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Roemer, J. E. (1977). Technical change and the “tendency of the rate of profit to fall.” Journal of Economic Theory, 16(2), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(77)90016-3 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/76803 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Biased technological change and Kaldor’s stylized facts. (deposited 15 Feb 2017 17:14) [Currently Displayed]