Porovnanie alternatívnych prístupov k odhadu individuálneho blahobytu domácností ohrozených rizikom chudoby

Zelinsky, Tomas (2010): Porovnanie alternatívnych prístupov k odhadu individuálneho blahobytu domácností ohrozených rizikom chudoby. Published in: Ekonomicky casopis , Vol. 58, No. 3 (2010): pp. 251-270.

Abstract

The choice of a proper approach to individual welfare measurement is an important element of poverty measurement process. The aim of the paper is to develop simple measures of individual welfare. Two alternative approaches to individual welfare estimation by direct method are used. The first approach is based on the furnishings of households by goods of long-term consumption. The second approach is based on the structure of households’ expenses. The indices of households’ furnishings and expenses structure are proposed. The levels of poorest households’ welfare in Eastern Slovakia (mainly of Roma ethnic origin) are then compared. The sample consists of 170 households from Eastern Slovakia participating in the ETP Slovakia microsavings program. The values of indices are in close relation to equivalent disposable income. The proposed indices may serve as supplementary measures of individual welfare of households

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: The Comparison of Alternative Approaches to the Estimation of Individual Welfare of Poor Households
• Language: Slovak
• Keywords: Individual welfare measurement, poverty, relative deprivation, social exclusion, Roma community.
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

ALKIRE, S. (2005): Capability and Functionings: Definition and Justification. Cambridge: Human Development and Capability Association.

DESAI, M. – SHAH, A. (1988): An Econometric Approach to the Measurement of Poverty. Oxford Economic Papers. New Series, 40, č. 3, s. 505 – 522.

DUCLOS, J. Y. – ARAAR, A. (2006): Poverty and Equity: Measurement, Policy and Estima-tion with DAD. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-0387-33318-2.

ETP (2007): Annual Report 2006. Košice: ETP Slovensko – Centrum pre udržateľný rozvoj.

EUROSTAT (2009): Algorithms to Compute Indicators in the Streamlined Social Inclusion Portfolio Based on EU-SILC and Adopted under the Open Method of Coordination (OMC). Luxembourg: Eurostat.

FILADELFIOVÁ, J. (2007): Životný cyklus: Vek, životný cyklus a medzigeneračný prenos chudoby. In: GERBERY, D. – LESAY, I. – ŠKOBLA, D. (eds): Kniha o chudobe: Spolo-čenské súvislosti a verejné politiky. Bratislava: Priatelia Zeme-CEPA. s. 9 – 28. ISBN 978-80-968918-9-4.

GOEDHART, T. et al. (1977): The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement. The Journal of Human Resources, 12, č. 4, s. 503 – 520.

GOOD, P. (2000): Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. 2. vyd. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-98898-X.

HAGENAARS, A. – VAN PRAAG, B. (1985): A Synthesis of Poverty Definitions. Review of Income and Wealth, 31, č. 2, s. 139 – 154.

HAUGHTON, J. – KHANDKER, S. R. (2009): Handbook on Poverty and Inequality. Washin-gton, DC: Svetová banka. ISBN 978-0-8213-7613-3.

HENDL, J. (2006): Přehled statistických metod zpracování dat: Analýza a metaanalýza dat. Praha: Portál. ISBN 80-7367-123-9.

HOLMAN, R. et al. (2005): Dějiny ekonomického myšlení. 3. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck. ISBN 80-7179-380-9.

KAPTEYN, A. et al. (1988): Some Methodological Issues in the Implementation of Subjective Poverty Definitions. The Journal of Human Resources, 23, č. 2, s. 222 – 242.

KHEMANI, R. S. – SHAPIRO, D. M. (1993): Glossary of Organisational Economics and Competition Law. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

KRISHNAKUMAR, J. (2005): Going beyond Functionings to Capabilities: An Econometric Model to Explain and Estimate Capabilities. In: The Many Dimensions of Poverty. [Inter-national Conference, 29. – 31. august 2005.] Brasilia: International Poverty Centre (UNDP).

LIPTON, M. – RAVALLION, M. (1993): Poverty and Policy. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

MARKOVIĆ, M. R. (2009): Globalization and Gender Participation in the Informal Sector in Developing and Transitional Countries. E & M Ekonomie a management, 12, č. 4, s. 17 – 26.

MORAWETZ, D. (1977): Twenty-five Years of Economic Development 1950 to 1975. [Report, No. 10098.] Washington, DC: Svetová banka.

NOVOTNÝ, J. (2006): Negativní vlivy společensko-ekonomických nerovností a mechanismy jejich regulace: argumenty z rozvojových zemí. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics, 54, č. 7, s. 709 – 724.

PAUHOFOVÁ, I. – PÁLENÍK, M. (2005): Dôchodková situácia a formovanie spotrebiteľských zvyklostí obyvateľstva Slovenska. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics, 53, č. 10, s. 972 – 990.

R Development Core Team (2008): R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. URL: <http://www.R-project.org>.

RAVALLION, M. (1992): Poverty Comparisons: A Guide to Concepts and Methods. Washin-gton, DC: Svetová banka. ISBN 0-8213-2036-X.

RAVALLION, M. (1998): Poverty Lines in Theory and Practice. [LSMS Working Paper, 133.] Washington, DC: Svetová banka. ISBN. 0-8213-4226-6.

SAMUELSON, P. A. – NORDHAUS, W. D. (2000): Ekonómia. 16. vydanie. Bratislava: Elita. ISBN 80-8044-059-X.

SEN, A. K. (1984): The Living Standard. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 36, Supple-ment: Economic Theory and Hicksian Themes, november, s. 74 – 90.

SEN, A. K. (1999): Commodities and Capabilities. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-565038-7.

SHESKIN, D. J. (2007): Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC. ISBN 978-1-58488-814-7.

SIROVÁTKA, T. – MAREŠ, P. (2006). Chudoba, deprivace, sociální vyloučení: nezaměstnaní a pracující chudí. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 42, č. 4, s. 627 – 655.

STANKOVIČOVÁ, I. – BARTOŠOVÁ, J. (2009): Príspevok k analýze subjektívnej chudoby v SR a ČR. Forum Statisticum Slovacum, 5, č. 3, s. 151 – 161.

STRENGMANN-KUHN, W. (2000): Theoretical Definition and Empirical Measurement of Welfare and Poverty: A Microeconomic Approach. [26th General Conference of The Inter-national Association for Research in Income and Wealth. Krakov, 27. 8. – 2. 9. 2000.] Ottawa: International Association for Research in Income and Wealth.

ŠARMÍR, E. (2006): Nezamestnanosť – pretrvávajúca výzva súčasného sociálno-ekonomického rozvoja. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics, 54, č. 10, s. 1024 – 1036.

ŠÚ SR (2007): EU SILC 2006: Zisťovanie o príjmoch a životných podmienkach domácností v SR. Bratislava: Štatistický úrad SR.

TOWNSEND, P. (1979): Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. (Reprinted 1983). ISBN 0-14-022139-5.

VINTROVÁ, R. (2008). Česká a slovenská ekonomika 15 let po rozdělení. Politická ekonomie, 56, č. 4, s. 449 – 466.

ZEMANOVÁ, Š. (2009): Amartya Kumar Sen – ekonom rozvoje a blahobytu, filozof svobody i bídy a hladu. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics, 57, č. 6, s. 587 – 599.