Governance and performance of Tunisian banks

Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali (2009): Governance and performance of Tunisian banks. Published in: International Journal of Economics and Finance , Vol. 2, No. 3 (August 2010): pp. 189-198.

Abstract

Developing banking standards is an important process for a country’s financial and economic well being. Their importance incites governments to insure the stability and the good performance of their banking systems. Accordingly, several researchers pay a particular attention to banking governance. Specifically, shareholders-managers’ convergence of interests and the possible repercussions of these on the performance of banks can be avoided only by implementing a solid system of governance. The main purpose of this article is to determine the impact of governance on the performance of banks, through an empirical study of a sample of 10 Tunisian banks during the period 1997-2007. Our empirical investigation shows a positive association between external administrators and performance. It is worth noting that a high number of administrators results in a negative effect on performance. The results also reveal that managers lack control while the board of directors seems to exert a lot of power. This state of affairs results from the fact of associating the role of the manager with that of the board of directors. Finally, our results reveal a negative association between the presence of a group of dominant shareholders and performance, a phenomenon which might be explained in terms of private appropriation of benefits.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Banks, Corporate governance, Board of directors, Ownership structure, Performance, Shareholders, Managers.
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G34 - Mergers ; Acquisitions ; Restructuring ; Corporate Governance; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill

References

• Adams R. and Mehran H., (2003). Board structure, banking firm performance and the Bank Holding Company organizational form, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Proceedings, pp. 408-422.

• Agrawal A. and Knoeber C.R, (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, pp. 377-397.

• André P. and Schiehll E., (2004). Systèmes de gouvernance, actionnaires dominants et performance future des entreprises, Revue Finance, Contrôle et Stratégie, 7, 2, pp. 165-193.

• Barkema H.G. and Gomez-Mejia L.R., (1998) Managerial remuneration and firm performance: A general research framework, Academy of Management Journal, 41, 2, pp. 135-145.

• Barnhart S.W. and Rosenstein S., Board Composition, (1998). Managerial ownership and firm performance: An empirical analysis, The Financial Review, pp. 1-16.

• Barros C.P., (2003). Bank privatization and efficiency: Portugal as a case study, Working Paper, Technical University of Lisbon.

• Barth J.R, Caprio G.J. and Levine R., (2004). Bank supervision and regulation: what works best?, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, pp. 205-248.

• Bauer R., Frijns B., Otten R. and Tourani-Rad A., (2008). The impact of corporate governance on corporate performance: Evidence from Japan, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 16, pp. 236–251.

• Beck T, Crivelli J.M. and Summerhill W., (2005). State bank transformation in Brazil – Choices and consequences », Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 8-9, pp. 2223-2257.

• Beck T., Cull R. and Jerome A., (2005). Bank privatization and performance: Empirical evidence from Nigeria, Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 8-9, pp. 2355-2379.

• Beck T., Demirgüç-Kunt A. and Maksimovic V., (2004). Bank competition and access to finance: Internationalevidence, Journal of Money, Credit & Banking, 36, pp. 627-648.

• Beck T., Levine R. and Loayza N., (2000). Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes, Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, 1, pp 31-77.

• Berger A.N. and Di Patti E.B., (2006). Capital structure and firm performance: a new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry, Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, pp. 1065-1102.

• Berger A.N., Clarke G.R.G., Cull R., Klapper L. and Udell G.F., (2005). Corporate governance and bank performance: A joint analysis of the static, selection and dynamic effects of domestic, foreign and state ownership, Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, pp. 2179-2221.

• Berle A.A. and Means G.C., (1932). The modern corporation and private property, MacMillan Company, New York.

• Bonaccorsi di Patti E. and Hardy D., (2005). Financial sector liberalization, bank privatization, and efficiency: Evidence from Pakistan, Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 8-9, pp. 2381-2406.

• Bonin J., Hasan I. and Wachtel P., (2005). Bank performance, efficiency and ownership in transition countries, Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, pp. 31-53.

• Byrd J., Parrino R. and Pritsch G., (1998). Stockholder-manager conflicts and firm value, Financial Analysts Journal, pp. 14-30.

• Bushman R.M., Indjejikian R.J. and Smith A., (1996). CEO remuneration: The role of individual performance evaluation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21, pp. 161-193.

• Caprio, G., Laeven, L. and Levine, R., (2007). Governance and banks valuations, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16, pp. 584-617.

• Charreaux G., (1997). Le gouvernement des entreprises : Corporate governance, Théories et faits, Economica.

• Charreaux G., (1998). Le point sur la mesure de performance des entreprises, Banque et Marchés, 34, pp. 46-51.

• Charreaux G., (2002). Au delà de l’approche juridico-financière : Le rôle cognitif des actionnaires sur l’analyse de la structure de la propriété et la gouvernance, Manuscrit, Université de Bourgogne.

• Core J.E., Holthausen R.W. and Larcker D., (1999). Corporate governance, CEO remuneration and firm performance, Journal of FinancialEconomics,51,3, pp.371-406.

• Demsetz H. and Lehn L., (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences, Journal of Political Economy, 93, pp. 1155-1177.

• Fama E., (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 2, pp. 288-307.

• Fama E. and Jensen M., (1983). Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 301-325.

• Fries S. and Taci A., (2005). Cost efficiency of banks in transition: Evidence from 289 banks in 15 post communist countries, Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, pp. 55-81.

• Gulamhussen M.A. and Guerreiro L., (2009). The influence of foreign equity and board membership on corporate strategy and internal cost management in Portuguese banks, Management Accounting Research, 20, pp. 6-17.

• Haber S., (2005). Mexico’s experiments with bank privatization and liberalization, 1991–2003, Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 8-9, pp. 2325-2353.

• Hasan I. and Marton k., (2003). Development and efficiency of the banking sector in a transitional economy: Hungarian experience, Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, pp. 2249-2271.

• Hermes N., (1994). Financial development and economic growth: A survey of the literature, International Journal of Development Banking, 12, 1, pp. 3-21.

• Jensen M.C., (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow: Corporate finance and takeovers, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 323-329.

• Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H., (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, l3, pp. 305-360.

• Kamran A., H. Mahmud and B.A. Mike (2006), The effects of board composition and board size on the informativeness of annual accounting earnings, Corporate governance, 14, 5, pp. 418-43.

• King R.G. and Levine R., (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, pp. 717-737.

• La Bruslerie H., (2003). Actionnaires contrôlants, bénéfices privés et endettement, Working paper présenté au congrès de l’AFFI.

• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F. and Shleifer A., (2002). Government ownership of commercial banks, Journal of Finance, 57, pp. 265-301.

• Levine R. and Zervos S., (1998). Stock markets, banks and economic growth, American Economic Review, 88, 3, pp. 537-558.

• Levine R., (1997). Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 2, pp. 688-726.

• Levine R., Law, (1999). Finance and economic growth, Journal of financial Intermediation, 8, 1-2, pp.8-35.

• Mace M.L., (1986). Directors: myth and reality, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp. 213.

• Macey J. and O’Hara M., (2003). The corporate governance of banks », Economic Policy Review, Federal reserve bank of New York, Special Issue, 9, 1, pp.91-108.

• Marris R., (1964). The economic theory of managerial capitalism, Free Press.

• Morck R., Shleifer A. and Vishny R., (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, pp.293-316.

• Nakane M., Weintraub D.B., (2005). Bank privatization and productivity: Evidence for Brazil, Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 8-9, pp. 2259-2289.

• Omrane M., (2003). Privatization, state ownership and the performance of Egyptian banks, paper presented at The world bank conference on “Bank privatization in low and middle income countries”.

• Otchere I. and Chan J., (2003). Intra-industry effects of bank privatization: A clinical analysis of the bank privatization of the commonwealth bank Australia, Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, pp. 949-975.

• Rajan R. and Zingales L., (1998). Financial dependence and growth, American Economic Review, 88, pp. 560-586.

• Smith A., (1776). The wealth of nations, Glasgow.

• Stulz R., (1988). Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, pp. 25-54

• Tobin J., (1958). Tobin’s Q: An empirical comparison, Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, pp. 313-341.

• Weill L., (2006). Propriété étrangère and efficience technique des banques dans les pays en transition : Une analyse par la méthode DEA », Revue économique, 5, 57, pp. 1093-1108.

• Williamson O., (1963). Managerial discretion and business behavior, American Economic Review, 93, pp. 1032-1057.

• Wurgler J., (2000). Financial markets and the allocation of capital, Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 1-2, pp. 187-214.

• Yermack D., (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a smaller board of directors, Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 2, pp. 185-212.