Optimal Privatization and Uniform Subsidy Policies: A Synthesis

Lin, Ming Hsin and Matsumura, Toshihiro (2017): Optimal Privatization and Uniform Subsidy Policies: A Synthesis.

Abstract

The privatization neutrality theorem states that the share of public ownership in an enterprise does not affect welfare (i.e., any degree of privatization is optimal) under optimal uniform tax-subsidy policy. We revisit this neutrality result. First, we investigate the case in which the private enterprise is domestic. We show that this neutrality result does not hold unless public and private enterprises have the same cost function. In addition, we show that the optimal degree of privatization is zero regardless whether the public or private firm has a cost advantage under the optimal subsidy policy. Next, we investigate a case in which the private enterprise is owned by both domestic and foreign investors. We show that the optimal degree of privatization is never zero, and thus, the neutrality result does not hold even when there is no cost difference between public and private enterprises.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: mixed oligopoly; mixed ownership; subsidy policy; partial privatization; optimal degree of privatization
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H42 - Publicly Provided Private Goods; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

References

Barcena-Ruiz, Carlos, Juan, and Begona Maria Garzon (2005a) `Economic integration and privatization under diseconomies of scale.' European Journal of Political Economy 21(1), 247-67. B\'{a}rcena-Ruiz, Carlos, Juan, and Begona Maria Garzon (2005b) `International trade and strategic privatization.' Review of Development Economics 9(4), 502-13. Barcena-Ruiz, Carlos, Juan, and Begona Maria Garzon (2010) `Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly with semipublic firms.' Portuguese Economic Journal 9(2), 97-113. Bose, Arup, Debashis Pal, and David E. M. Sappington (2014) `The impact of public ownership in the lending sector.' Canadian Journal of Economics 47(4), 1282-311. \item[]Capuano, Carlo, and Giuseppe De Feo (2010) `Privatization in oligopoly: the impact of the shadow cost of public funds.' Rivista Italiana Degli Economisti 15(2), 175-208. Cato, Susumu, and Toshihiro Matsumura (2012) `Long-run effects of foreign penetration on privatization policies.' Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 168(3), 444-54. Cato, Susumu, and Toshihiro Matsumura (2013) `Long-run effects of tax policies in a mixed market.' FinanzArchiv 69(2), 215-40. Corneo, Giacomo, and Olivier Jeanne (1994) `Oligopole mixte dans un marche commun.' Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 33, 73-90. Fjell, Kenneth, and John S. Heywood (2004) `Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firm's moves: the relevance of privatization.' Economics Letters 83(3), 411-6. Fjell, Kenneth, and Debashis Pal (1996) A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Canadian Journal of Economics 29(3), 737-43. Gil-Molto, Maria Jose, Joanna Poyago-Theotoky, and Vasileios Zikos (2011) `R\&D subsidies, spillovers, and privatization in mixed markets.' Southern Economic Journal} 78(1), 233-55. Hamilton, Jonathan H., and Steven M. Slutsky (1990) `Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria.' Games and Economic Behavior 2(1), 29-46. Han, Lihua, and Hikaru Ogawa (2012) `Market-demand boosting and privatization in a mixed duopoly.' Bulletin of Economic Research 64(1), 125-34. Hashimzade, Nigar, Hassan Khodavaisi, and Gareth Myles (2007) `An irrelevance result with differentiated goods.' Economics Bulletin 8(2), 1-7. Ishibashi, Ikuo, and Toshihiro Matsumura (2006) `R&D competition between public and private sectors.' European Economic Review 50(6), 1347-66. Ishida, Junichiro, and Noriaki Matsushima (2009) `Should civil servants be restricted in wage bargaining? A mixed-duopoly approach.' Journal of Public Economics 93(3-4), 634-46. Kato, Kazuhiko, and Yoshihiro Tomaru (2007) `Mixed oligopoly, privatization, subsidization and the order of firms' moves: several types of objectives.' Economics Letters 96(2), 287-92. Lin, Ming Hsin, and Toshihiro Matsumura (2012) `Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy.' Journal of Economics 107(1), 71-80. Martin, Stephen, and David Parker (1997) The Impact of Privatisation. Ownership and Corporate Performance in the UK}, London and New York: Routledge. Matsumura, Toshihiro (1998) `Partial privatization in mixed duopoly.' Journal of Public Economics 70(3), 473-83. Matsumura, Toshihiro (2003a) `Endogenous role in mixed markets: a two production period model.' Southern Economic Journal 70(2), 403-13. Matsumura, Toshihiro (2003b) `Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor.' Bulletin of Economic Research 55(3), 275-87. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Noriaki Matsushima (2004) `Endogenous cost differentials between public and private enterprises: a mixed duopoly approach.' Economica 71(284), 671-88. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Akira Ogawa (2010) `On the robustness of private leadership in mixed duopoly.' Australian Economic Papers 49(2), 149-60. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Yasunori Okumura (2013) `Privatization neutrality theorem revisited.' Economics Letters 118(2), 324-26. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Daisuke Shimizu (2010) `Privatization waves.' Manchester School 78(6), 609-25. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Takeaki Sunada (2013) `Advertising competition in a mixed oligopoly.' Economics Letters 119(2), 183-5. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Yoshihiro Tomaru (2012) `Market structure and privatization policy under international competition.' Japanese Economic Review 63(2), 244-58. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Yoshihiro Tomaru (2013) `Mixed duopoly, privatization, and subsidization with excess burden of taxation.' Canadian Journal of Economics 46(2), 526-54. Megginson, William L., and Jeffry M. Netter (2001) `From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization.' Journal of Economic Literature 39(2), 321-89. Merrill, William C., and Norman Schneider (1966) `Government firms in oligopoly industries: a short-run analysis.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(3), 400-12. Myles, Gareth (2002) `Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firms' moves: an irrelevance result for the general case.' Economics Bulletin 12(1) 1-6. Pal, Debashis (1998) `Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly.' Economics Letters 61(2), 181-5. Pal, Debashis, and Mark D. White (1998) `Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy.' Southern Economic Journal 65(2), 264-81. Poyago-Theotoky, Joanna (2001) `Mixed oligopoly, subsidization, and the order of firm's moves: an irrelevance result.' Economics Bulletin 12(3), 1-5. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1988) Economics of the Public Sector, 2nd Edition, Norton, New York. Tomaru, Yoshihiro (2006) `Mixed oligopoly, partial privatization and subsidization.' Economics Bulletin 12(5), 1-6. Tomaru, Yoshihiro, and Kazuharu Kiyono (2010) `Endogenous timing in mixed duopoly with increasing marginal costs.' Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 166(4), 591-613. Tomaru, Yoshihiro, and Masayuki Saito (2010) `Mixed duopoly, privatization and subsidization in an endogenous timing framework.' Manchester School 78(1), 41-59. White, Mark D. (1996) `Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization.' Economics Letters 53(2), 189-95.