Hirose, Kosuke and Matsumura, Toshihiro (2017): Comparing Welfare and Profit in Quantity and Price Competition within Stackelberg Mixed Duopolies.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_77700.pdf Download (96kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We compare welfare and profits under price and quantity competition in mixed duopolies, wherein a state-owned public firm competes against a private firm. It has been shown that price competition yields larger profit for the private firm and greater welfare if the two firms move simultaneously, regardless of whether the private firm is domestic or foreign. We investigate welfare and profit rankings under Stackelberg competition. Under public leadership, the profit and welfare rankings have common features with the simultaneous-move game, regardless of the nationality of private firms. By contrast, under private leadership, the result depends on the nationality of the private firm. When the private firm is domestic, welfare is greater under quantity competition, while the result is reversed when the private firm is foreign. However, regardless of nationality, private firms earn more under price competition. Introducing the nonnegative profit constraint in the public firm improves welfare and increases the private firm's profit, and price competition yields a higher profit for private firms regardless of nationality and which firm is the leader. However, this constraint affects the welfare ranking. Under private leadership, quantity competition yields greater welfare regardless of the nationality of the private firm. These results indicate that profit ranking is fairly robust to the time structure in mixed Stackelberg duopolies, but welfare ranking is not.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Comparing Welfare and Profit in Quantity and Price Competition within Stackelberg Mixed Duopolies |
English Title: | Comparing Welfare and Profit in Quantity and Price Competition within Stackelberg Mixed Duopolies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | public leadership; private leadership; mixed markets; Cournot-Bertrand comparison |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H42 - Publicly Provided Private Goods H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises |
Item ID: | 77700 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Kosuke Hirose |
Date Deposited: | 20 Mar 2017 16:18 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 07:09 |
References: | B\'{a}rcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos. 2007. Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: price competition. Journal of Economics 91(3):263--72. B\'{a}rcena-Ruiz, Carlos, Juan, and Begona Maria Garz\'{o}n. 2005a. Economic integration and privatization under diseconomies of scale. European Journal of Political Economy 21(1), 247--67. B\'{a}rcena-Ruiz, Carlos, Juan, and Begona Maria Garz\'{o}n. 2005b. International trade and strategic privatization. Review of Development Economics 9(4), 502--13. Boyer, Marcel and Michel Moreaux. 1987. On Stackelberg equilibria with differentiated products: the critical role of the strategy space. Journal of Industrial Economics 36(2): 217--230. Capuano, Carlo, and Giuseppe De Feo. 2010. Privatization in oligopoly: the impact of the shadow cost of public funds. Rivista Italiana Degli Economisti 15(2):175--208. Cato, Susumu and Toshihiro Matsumura. 2012. Long-run effects of foreign penetration on privatization policies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 168(3), 444--54. Cato, Susumu, and Toshihiro Matsumura. 2015. Optimal privatization and trade policies with endogenous market structure. Economic Record 91:309--23. Chirco, Alessandra, Caterina Colombo, and Marcella Scrimitore. 2014. Organizational structure and the choice of price versus quantity in a mixed duopoly. Japanese Economic Review 65(4):521--42. Chirco, Alessandra, and Marcella Scrimitore. 2013. Choosing price or quantity? The role of delegation and network externalities. Economics Letters, 121(3):482--86. Corneo, Giacomo, and Olivier Jeanne. 1994. Oligopole mixte dans un marche commun. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 33:73--90. Dixit, Avinash K. 1979. A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. Bell Journal of Economics 10(1):20--32. Estrin, Saul and David de Meza. 1995. Unnatural monopoly. Journal of Public Economics 57(3): 471--88 Fjell, Kenneth, and Debashis Pal. 1996. A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Canadian Journal of Economics 29(3):737--43. Gelves, J. A. and Heywood, J. S. 2013. Privatizing by merger: The case of an inefficient public leader. International Review of Economics and Finance, 27, 69--79 Ghosh, Arghya, and Manipushpak Mitra. 2010. Comparing Bertrand and Cournot in mixed markets. Economics Letters 109(2):72--4. Ghosh, Arghya, and Manipushpak Mitra. 2014. Reversal of Bertrand-Cournot rankings in the presence of welfare concerns. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 170(3):496--519. Han, Lihua, and Hikaru Ogawa. 2008. Economic integration and strategic privatization in an international mixed oligopoly. FinanzArchiv 64(3):352--63. Haraguchi, Junichi, and Toshihiro Matsumura. 2014. Price versus quantity in a mixed duopoly with foreign penetration. Research in Economics 68(4):338--53. Haraguchi, Junichi, and Toshihiro Matsumura. 2016. Cournot-Bertrand comparison in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics 117(2):117--36. Horiuchi, Akiyoshi, and Qing-Yuan Sui. 1993. Influence of the Japan Development Bank loans on corporate investment behavior. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 7(4):441--65. Ino, Hiroaki, and Toshihiro Matsumura. 2010. What role should public enterprises play in free-entry markets? Journal of Economics 101(3):213--30. Ishida, Junichiro, and Noriaki Matsushima. 2009. Should civil servants be restricted in wage bargaining? a mixed-duopoly approach. Journal of Public Economics:93(3--4), 634--46. Lin, Ming Hsin, and Toshihiro Matsumura. 2012. Presence of foreign investor in privatized firms and privatization policy. Journal of Economics 107(1):71--80. Matsumura, Toshihiro. 1998. Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics 70(3):473--83. Matsumura, Toshihiro. 2003a. Endogenous role in mixed markets: a two-production period model. Southern Economic Journal 70(2):403--13. Matsumura, Toshihiro. 2003b. Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor. Bulletin of Economic Research 55(3):275--87. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Akira Ogawa. 2010. On the robustness of private leadership in mixed duopoly. Australian Economic Papers 49(2):149--60. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Akira Ogawa. 2012. Price versus quantity in a mixed duopoly. Economics Letters 116(2):174--77. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Akira Ogawa. 2017. Inefficient but robust public leadership. forthcoming in Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Yasunori Okumura. 2013. Privatization neutrality theorem revisited. Economics Letters 118(2):324--26. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Yasunori Okumura. 2017. Privatization neutrality theorem in free entry markets. forthcoming in B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Daisuke Shimizu. 2010. Privatization waves. Manchester School 78(6):609--25. Matsumura, Toshihiro, and Takeaki Sunada. 2013. Advertising competition in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters, 119(2), 183--185. Merrill, William, and Norman Schneider. 1966. Government firms in oligopoly industries: a short-run analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(3):400--12. Myles, Gareth. 2002. Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firms' moves: an irrelevance result for the general case. Economics Bulletin 12(1) 1--6. Pal, Debashis. 1998. Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters 61(2):181--5. Poyago-Theotoky, Joanna. 2001. Mixed oligopoly, subsidization, and the order of firm's moves: an irrelevance result. Economics Bulletin 12(3), 1--5. Scrimitore, Marcella. 2013. Price or quantity?: the strategic choice of subsidized firms in a mixed duopoly. Economics Letters 118(2):337--341. Scrimitore, Marcella. 2014. Profitability under commitment in Cournot and Bertrand mixed markets. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 170(4):684--703. Shubik, Martin, and Richard Levitan. 1980. Market Structure and Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.). Singh, Nirvikar, and Xavier Vives. 1984. Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND Journal of Economics 15(4):546--54. Tomaru, Yoshihiro, and Kazuharu Kiyono. 2010. Endogenous timing in mixed duopoly with increasing marginal costs. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 166(4), 591--613. Tomaru, Yoshihiro, and Masayuki Saito. 2010. Mixed duopoly, privatization and subsidization in an endogenous timing framework. Manchester School 78(1), 41--59. Vives, Xavier. 1985. On the efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria with product differentiation. Journal of Economic Theory 36:166--75. Wang L. F. S. and Lee, J. Y. 2013. Foreign penetration and undesirable competition. Economic Modelling, 30(1), 729--32. Wang, L. F. S. and Mukherjee, A. 2012. Undesirable competition. Economics Letters, 114(2), 175--7. Wang, L.F.S. and Tomaru, Y., 2015. The feasibility of privatization and foreign penetration. International Review of Economics \& Finance, 39, 36-46. White, Mark D. 1996. Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization. Economics Letters 53(2), 189--95. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/77700 |