A Spatial Analysis of Innovation in Europe

Tonnerre, Antoine (2017): A Spatial Analysis of Innovation in Europe.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is two-fold. Firstly, it surveys different works related to the analysis of Innovation and the way it spreads locally. We will see that theoretical predictions and empirical facts are rather contradictory. This will lead us, secondly, to shedding light towards the concentration of innovative activities in the European Union, at a more precise level of analysis: the NUTS2 nomenclature. We contradict the usually accepted empirical fact that innovative activities tend to be less and less concentrated, thus supporting the theory of knowledge spillovers, which is probably due to the important changes the European Union went through in terms of trade structure. This claim relies on a rather simple but well-founded analysis. Patent applications to the European Patent Office will be used as a proxy for the level of Innovation. These patent applications have a geographical component that will be exploited to determine whether spatial autocorrelation of innovative activities is present. After showing the importance of considering spatial autocorrelation in an analysis of Innovation, we will propose an empirical methodology to assess how it spreads. Regarding this, no results are presented, as it goes beyond the scope of the paper.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Innovation, knowledge spillovers, spatial concentration, spatial autocorrelation, empirics, patents, European Union, NUTS2.
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity

References

Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2006, March). Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, pp. 37-74.

Acemoglu, D., Bimpikis, K., & Ozdaglar, A. (2011, February). Experimentation, Patents, and Innovation. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, Vol. 3, pp. 37-77.

Anselin, L. (1995, April). Local Indicators of Spatial Association. Geographical Analysis, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp. 93-115.

Arrow, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventinos. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 609-626.

Autant-Bernard, C., Lesage, J. P., & Parent, O. (2007, December). Firm Innovation Strategies: A Spatial Cohort Multinomial Probit Approach. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, N° 87/88, Spatial Econometrics, Innovative Networks and Growth, pp. 63-80.

Baldwin, R., DiNino, V., Fontagné, L., Santis, R. A., & Taglioni, D. (May 2008). Study on the Impact of the Euro on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. Economic and Financial Affairs Directorate-General of the European Commission.

Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology. Communications of the ACM, pp. 66-77. 19

Frontier Economics Ltd. (2014, July). Rates of return to investment in science and innovation. Prepared for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (bis), London.

Hollanders, H., Es-Sadki, N., Buligescu, B., Leon, L. R., Griniece, E., & Roman, L. (2014). Regional Innovation Scoreboard. European Union.

Jacks, D. (2009, September 12). Revisiting the Death of Distance. Retrieved from VOX: http://voxeu.org/article/revisiting-death-distance

Langinier, C., & Moschini, G. (2002, February). The Economics of Patents: An Overview. Working Paper 02-WP 293, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development.

Li, Y. A., & Minondo, A. (2014, February 25). Has Distance Died with Networks? - An Empirical Study of Scholarly Citations and Genealogy in Knowledge Spillovers. HKUST; University of Deusto.

Lucas, R. E. (1988, February). Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics.

Moreno, R., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2003, December). Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions. WP CRENoS.

Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002). The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy. Journal of Technology Transfer.

Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2001, Summer). Innovation: Location Matters. MIT Sloan Management Review.

Romer, P. M. (1986, October). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, pp. 1002-1037.

Scott, A. J. (2006, February). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Industrial Development: Geography and the Creative Field Revisited. Small Business Economics, pp. 1-24.

Vazquez-Barquero, A. (2003). Chapter 2: An approach for action. Endogenous Development: Networking, Innovation, Institutions and Cities, 21-35.

Wetherbe, J. C., Turban, E., Leidner, D. E., & McLean, E. R. (2007). Information Technology for Management: Transforming Organizations in the Digital Economy (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.

Zilibotti, F. (n.d.). Distance to technology frontier and European economic growth.