Immigrant Concentration at School and Natives’ Achievement: Does the Type of Migrants and Natives Matter?

Bossavie, Laurent (2017): Immigrant Concentration at School and Natives’ Achievement: Does the Type of Migrants and Natives Matter?

Abstract

Using a rich dataset of primary school students in the Netherlands, this paper investigates the hetero- geneous effects of immigrant concentration in the classroom on the academic achievement of natives. To identify the treatment effect, it takes advantage of some features of the Dutch primary school system and uses cohort-by-cohort deviations in immigrant concentration within schools. While we report an insignificant impact of the share of immigrant classmates overall, we show that effects are heterogeneous, both in the type of immigrant classmates, and in the type of native students that are affected. Only immigrants that have been living in the country for a short period of time are found to negatively impact natives’ performance. This negative impact is stronger among natives with low parental education. We also report a negative effect of the concentration of migrants with low parental education, while migrants with high parental education are found to have no impact. The importance of taking into account heterogeneity could explain the mixed findings reported by previous literature on the topic.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Immigration, education, peer effects
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J15 - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants ; Non-labor Discrimination

References

J. D. Angrist and K. Lang. Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston’s Metco program. American Economic Review, 94(5):1613–1634, 2004.

J. D. Angrist and V. Lavy. Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2):533–575, 1999.

R. M. Ballatore, M. Fort, and A. Ichino. The tower of Babel in the classroom: Immigrants and natives in Italian schools. CEPR Discussion Papers 10341, 2015.

T. Brodaty. Les effets de pairs dans l’éducation: Une revue de littérature. Revue d'économie politique, 120(5):739–757, 2010.

G. Brunello and L. Rocco. The effect of immigration on the school performance of natives: Cross country evidence using PISA test scores. Economics of Education Review, 32(1):234– 246, 2013.

S. Carrell, R. Fullerton, and J. West. Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3):439–464, 2009.

F. Cunha and J. Heckman. The technology of skill formation. American Economic Review, 97 (2):31–47, 2007.

E. Duflo, P. Dupas, and M. Kremer. Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. American Economic Review, 101(5):1739– 1774, 2011.

D. Epple and R. Romano. Peer effects in education: Survey of the theory and evidence. In Hand- book of Social Economics, volume 1, pages 1053–1063. Elsevier BV, 2011.

C. Geay, S. McNally, and S. Telhaj. Non-native speakers of English in the classroom: What are the effects on pupil performance? Economic Journal, 123(570):F281–F307, 2013.

E. D. Gould, L. Lavy, and M.D. Paserman. Does immigration affect the long-term educational outcomes of natives? Quasi-experimental evidence. Economic Journal, 119(540):1243–1269, 2009.

E. A. Hanushek, J. F. Kain, J. M. Markman, and S. G. Rivkin. Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(5):527–544, 2003.

E. A. Hanushek, J. F. Kain, and S. G. Rivkin. New evidence about Brown v Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3):349–383, 2004.

C. Hoxby. Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. NBER Working Paper 7867, 2000.

P. Jensen and A. Rasmussen. The effect of immigrant concentration in schools on native and immigrant children’s reading and math skills. Economics of Education Review, 30(6):1503– 1515, 2011.

V. Lavy and A. Schlosser. Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2):1–33, 2011.

E. P. Lazear. Educational production. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3):777–803, 2001.

C. Manski. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3):531–542, 1993.

OECD. Untapped skills: Realizing the potential of immigrant students. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2012.

A. Ohinata and J. C. van Ours. How immigrant children affect the academic achieve- ment of native Dutch children. The Economic Journal, 123(570):F308–F331, 2013.

B. Sacerdote. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 116(2):681–704, 2001.

N. Schneeweis. Immigrant concentration in schools: Consequences for native and migrant students. Labor Economics, 35(C):63–76, 2015.

M. Tornello. Peer effects of non-native students on natives’ educational outcomes: Mechanisms and evidence. Empirical Economics, 51(1):383–414, 2016.