Eder, Andreas (2017): Cost efficiency and economies of diversification of biogas-fuelled cogeneration plants in Austria: a nonparametric approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80369.pdf Download (759kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper investigates the existence and the degree of economies of diversification for small-scaled, renewable-fuelled cogeneration systems using 2014 cross-sectional data from 67 Austrian biogas plants. In addition, cost efficiency of those biogas plants is estimated with a non-parametric linear programming technique, known as Data Envelopment Analysis. This is the first study applying the methodology proposed by Chavas and Kim (2010). Economies of diversification are decomposed into three additive parts: a part measuring complementarity among outputs; a part reflecting economies of scale; a part reflecting convexity. Furthermore, this paper extends the decomposition introduced by Chavas and Kim (2010) in such a way that the contribution of each input to economies of diversification and its components can be investigated. The results indicate substantial cost savings from diversification. For very-small scaled plants (<100 kWel) most of the cost savings come from scale economies. For larger plants (>250 kWel) positive complementarity and convexity effects are the main source of economies of diversification and outweigh the negative effect from scale diseconomies. In addition to substantial fuel/feedstock cost reductions, significant costs saving effects from the jointness in labour and other inputs positively contribute to the complementarity effect. While on average capital and labour costs positively contribute to economies of scale, feedstock costs work in the direction of diseconomies of scale.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Cost efficiency and economies of diversification of biogas-fuelled cogeneration plants in Austria: a nonparametric approach |
English Title: | Cost efficiency and economies of diversification of biogas-fuelled cogeneration plants in Austria: a nonparametric approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Data Envelopment Analysis, Economies Scale, Economies of Scope, Renewable Energy Sources, Energy Efficiency |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D ; Agricultural Technology ; Biofuels ; Agricultural Extension Services Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources |
Item ID: | 80369 |
Depositing User: | Mag. Andreas Eder |
Date Deposited: | 26 Jul 2017 15:00 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 09:52 |
References: | Arora , A., Gambardella, A., Magazzini, L., Pammolli, F., 2009. A breath of fresh air? Firm type, scale, scope, and selection effects in drug development. Management Science 55, 1638–1653. Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C., Willig, R.D., 1982. Contestable Markets and Theory of Industry Structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York. Berger, A.N., Hanweck, G.A., Humphrey, D.B., 1987. Competitive viability in banking: scale, scope and product mix economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 501-520. Briec W., Kerstens, K., Vanden Eeckaut, P.V., 2004. Non-convex Technologies and Cost Functions: Definitions, Duality and Nonparametric Tests of Convexity. Journal of Economics 81, 155-192. Bruno, C., 2011. Economies of vertical and horizontal integration, unbundling and quality of service in public utilities. A literature review. Hermes Working Paper n. 5/2011. Available from: http://www.hermesricerche.it/eng/index1.htm [accessed 26 June 2017]. BMLFUW, 2015. Biogas 2014 – Ergebnisse und Konsequenzen der Betriebszweigauswertung in den Arbeitskreisen Biogas. Chavas, J.P., Kim, K., 2007. Measurement and sources of economies of scope: a primal approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 163, 411-427. Chavas, J.P., Kim, K., 2010. Economies of diversification: A generalization and decomposition of economies of scope. International Journal of Production Economics 126, 229-235. Chavas, J.P., Barham, B., Foltz, J., Kim, K., 2012. Analysis and decomposition of scope economies: R&D at US research universities. Applied Economics 44, 1387-1404. Connolly, D., Lund, H., Mathiesen, B.V., Werner, S., Möller, B., Persson, U., Boermans, T., Trier, D., Ostergaard, P.A., Nielsen, S., 2014. Heat Roadmap Europe: Combining district heating with heat savings to decarbonise the EU energy system. Energy Policy 65, 475-489. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K., 2006. Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and its Uses. Springer Science+Business Meida, LLC, New York. Dakpo, K.H., Jeanneaux, P., Latruffe, L., 2016. Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric framework. European Journal of Operational Research 250, 347-359. E-Control. Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft; Available from: http://www.e-control.at/statistik [accessed 3 May 2017]. Eder, A., Mahlberg, B., 2018. Size, Subsidies and Technical Efficiency in Renewable Energy Production: The Case of Austrian Biogas Plants. The Energy Journal, (in print). Eder A., Mahlberg B., Stürmer B., 2017. Measuring and explaining productivity growth of renewable energy plants: An empirical study of Austrian biogas plants. Munich Personal RePEc Archiv (MPRA) Paper No. 79826. Available from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/79826 [accessed 13 July 2017]. Eurostat, 2017. Short Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/energy/data/shares [accessed 26 June 2017]. Evans, D.S., Heckmann, J.J., 1984. A test for subadditivity of the cost function with an application to the bell system. American Economic Review 74, 615-623. Ferrier, G.D., Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K.J., Yaisawarng, S., 1993. Economies of Diversification in the Banking Industry – A Frontier Approach. Journal of Monetary Economics 31, 229-249. Filler, G., M. Odening, S. Seeger, and J. Hahn (2007). „Zur Effizienz von Biogasanlagen.“ Berichte über Landwirtschaft 85(2): 178-194. http://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/Service/BerichteLandwirtschaft/2007_Heft2_Band85.pdf?__blob=publicationFile Growitsch, C., Wetzel, H., 2009. Testing for economies of scope in European railways: An efficiency analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 43, 1-24. IEA, 2011. Co-generation and Renewables – Solutions for a low-carbon energy future. Paris: International Energy Agency. Kitzing, L., Mitchell, C., Morthorst, P.E., 2012. Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging? Energy Policy 51, 192-201. Klessmann, C., Held, A., Rathmann, M., Ragwitz, M., 2011. Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union–What is needed to reach the 2020 targets? Energy Policy 39, 7637-7657. Kwon, O.S., Yun, W.C., 2003. Measuring economies of scope for cogeneration systems in Korea: a nonparametric approach. Energy Economics 25, 331-338. Macher, J.T., 2006. Technological development and the boundaries of the firm: a knowledge-based examination in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Science 52, 826–843. Madlener, R., Wickert, M., 2007. Optimal technology choice and investment timing: A stochastic model of industrial cogeneration vs. heat-only production. Energy Economics 29, 934-952. Panzer, J.C., Willig, R.D., 1981. Economies of scope. American Economic Review 71, 268-272. Paul, C.J.M., Nehring, R., 2005. Product diversification, production systems, and economic performance in U.S. agricultural production. Journal of Econometrics 126, 525-548. Pope, B., Johnson, A., 2013. Returns to scope: a metric for production synergies demonstrated for hospital production. Journal of Productivity Analysis 40, 239-250. Portela, M.C.A.S., 2014. Value and quantity data in economic and technical efficiency measurement. Economic Letters 124, 108-112. Preyra, C., Pink, G. 2006. Scale and scope efficiencies through hospital consolidations. Journal of Health Economics 25, 1049-1068. Rawley E., Simcoe, T.S., 2010. Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Science 56, 1534–1550. Sahoo, B.K., Mehdiloozad, M., Tone, K., 2014. Cost, revenue and profit efficiency measurement in DEA: A directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research 237, 921-931. Sav, G.T., 2004. Higher education costs and scale and scope economies. Applied Economics 36, 607–614. Skovsgaard, L., Klinge Jacobsen, H. 2017. Economies of scale in biogas production and the significance of flexi¬ble regulation. Energy Policy 101, 77-89. Tone, K., 2002. A strange case of the cost and allocative efficiencies in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53, 1225-1231. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80369 |