de Rus, Gines and Nash, C.A. (2007): In what circumstances is investment in HSR worthwhile?
Download (674kB) | Preview
The case for building new High Speed Rail (HSR) infrastructure depends its the capacity to generate social benefits which compensate for the construction, maintenance and operation costs. Decisions to invest in this technology have not always been based on sound economic analysis. A mix of arguments, besides time savings –strategic considerations, environmental effects, regional development and so forth– have often been used with inadequate evidence to support them.
We have explored under what conditions net welfare gains can be expected from new HSR projects. In this paper we use some simplifying assumptions with the aim of obtaining a benchmark: the minimum level of demand from which a positive social net present value could be expected when new capacity does not provide additional benefits beyond time savings from diverted and generated demand.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||In what circumstances is investment in HSR worthwhile?|
|Keywords:||public investmest, infrastructure, cost-benefit analysis, transport, high speed rail|
|Subjects:||R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R40 - General
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis
|Depositing User:||Gines de Rus|
|Date Deposited:||02. Apr 2008 13:22|
|Last Modified:||08. Jan 2014 16:29|
Atkins (2003): High Speed Line Study, London. Barrón de Angoiti, I. (2004): Construction costs of high speed lines. UIC, París.
Bonnafous A (1987): “The Regional Impact of the TGV”. Transportation Vol 14 pp 127-137
CE Delft (2003) To shift or not to shift, that’s the question. The environmental performance of the principal modes of freight and passenger transport in the policymaking context. Delft.
de Rus, G. and Inglada, V. (1993): “Análisis coste-beneficio del tren de alta velocidad en España”, Economía Aplicada, 3, pp. 27-48. 1993.
de Rus, G. and Inglada, V. (1997): “Cost-benefit analysis of the high-speed train in Spain”, The Annals of Regional Science, 31, pp. 175-188.
Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999): The incidence of imperfect competition in UK sectors and regions, London.
Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (2004): High speed line study. Feasibility study by Atkins for the Strategic Rail Authority, London.
Evans, AW (2003) Accidental fatalities in transport. JRSS Series A vol 162 no 2 pp253-260.
Flyvbjerg, B. Skamris, M.K. and Buhl, S.L. (2003): "What causes cost overrun in transport infrastructure projects?" Transport Reviews, vol. 24 (1) pp. 3-18.
European Commission (1997): Guide to cost-benefit analysis of major projects. In the context of EC regional policy. Directorate-General XVI. Brussels.
Gibson S, Cooper G, Bell B (2002): “Capacity charges on the UK rail network”. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. Vol 36, No 2 pp 341-354
Graham D J (2005): Wider Economic Benefits of Transport Improvements: Link Between Agglomeration and Productivity. Imperial College, London.
Harberger, A.C. (1972): Project evaluation: collected papers. The University of Chicago Press.
Hensher D A (1977): Value of Business Travel Time. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
INFRAS and IWW (2000) External Costs of Transport, Zurich/Karslruhe.
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds (2003): Values of Travel Time Saving in the UK.
Jara Diaz, S. (1986): “On the relation between users´ benefits and the economic effects of transportation activities” Journal of Regional Science, vol 26, pp. 379-391.
Marks P, Fowkes AS, Nash CA (1986): Valuing Long Distance Business Travel Time Savings for Evaluation: A Methodological Review and Application. PTRC Summer Annual Meeting.
Mohring, H. (1976): Transportation economics. Ballinger Publishing Company.
Nellthorp J., Sansom T., Bickel P., Doll C. and Lindberg G. (2001): Valuation conventions for UNITE, UNITE (UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency), 5th Framework RTD Programme. ITS, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Steer Davies Gleave (2004): High speed rail: international comparisons. Commission for Integrated Transport, London. Transport and Mobility Leuven (2005): ASSESS Final Report, Annex 21.
Vickerman (2006) Indirect and wider economic benefits of high speed rail. Paper given at the 4th annual conference on railroad industry structure, competition and investment, Madrid, October.
Wardman M (2001): “A review of British evidence on Time and Service Quality”. Transportation Research E, Vol 37, No 2 pp 107-128.