Le Quang, Canh and Kim, Kwang Soo and Yi, Yu (2014): Effects of Corporate Governance on the Performance of Private Economic Groups in Vietnam. Published in: Journal of International Trade & Commerce , Vol. 6, No. 10 (2014): pp. 39-56.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_81062.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Using the unique combined dataset of three previous surveys, this paper examines the effects of corporate governance on the performance of large private interprises in Vietnam. Five measures of corporate governance and three variable proxies for performance are employed to investigate effects of corporate governance on performance. Estimated results show that Chair-CEO duality positively correlates with better performance, and increasing the size of the board of directors is negatively associated with worse performance regardless of performance measures. These empirical effects are the same across sectors, export and import–related enterprises, and between female and male CEO enterprises. Independence of the board has no link to performance of enterprises. Such results contribute to the extant literature by providing empirical evidence and shedding light on understanding the effects of corporate governance on the performance of large private enterprises in Vietnam.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Effects of Corporate Governance on the Performance of Private Economic Groups in Vietnam |
English Title: | Effects of Corporate Governance on the Performance of Private Economic Groups in Vietnam |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Corporate Governance, Private Enterprise, Firm Performance, Vietnam |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M10 - General |
Item ID: | 81062 |
Depositing User: | Canh Quang Le |
Date Deposited: | 09 Sep 2017 05:15 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:32 |
References: | Barrett, P. (2002). Expectation and perception of better practice: Corporate governance in the public sector from an audit perspective, Speech at CPA Australia’s Government Business Symposium, Melbourne Bebchuk, L., A. Cohen and A. Ferrell (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies 22, 783 Bhagat, S. and B. Bolton (2009). Corporate governance and firm performance: Recent Evidence, www.econ.upf.edu/docs/seminars/bhagat.pdf (assess on July 2, 2014) Bhagat, S., B. Black (2002).The non-correlation between board independence and long term firm performance, Journal of Corporation Law 27, 231–274 Bhagat, S., B. Bolton (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance, Journal of Corporate Finance 14, 257–273 Bhagat, S., D. Carey, and C. Elson (1999). Director ownership, corporate performance, and management turnover, The Business Lawyer 54 Bhagat, Sanjai and Bernard Black, (2002). The non-correlation between board independence and long term firm performance, Journal of Corporation Law 27, 231-274 Brickley, J.A., J.L. Coles, and G. Jarrell (1997). Leadership structure: separating the CEO and chairman of the board, Journal of Corporate Finance, 3, 189–220 Coles, J., L., Daniel, N., D. and Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329-356 Core, J., Guay,W., Rusticus, T. (2006). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors' expectations. Journal of Finance 61, 655–687 Cremers, M.K. and V.B. Nair (2005). Governance mechanisms and equity prices, Journal of Finance 60, 2859–2894 Daily, C. and Dalton, D. (1997). CEO and Board chair roles held jointly or separately: much ado about nothing? Academy of management Executive, 11 (3), pp. 11-20 Dalton, D. et al. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674-686 Davis, J, Schoorman, F., and Donaldson, L (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management, Academy of management Review, 22, pp. 20-47 Donaldson, L. and J. Davis (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns, Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 16., No.1, 49-64 Edward, M. and R. Clough (2005). Corporate governance and performance: An exploration of the connection in a public sector context, Issues Series Paper No. 1 Gompers, P.A., J.L. Ishii, and A. Metrick (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1), 107–155 GSO (2013). Statistical Yearbook 2012, Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi Heracleous, L. (2001). What is the impact of corporate governance on organizational performance?” Business Policy 24, National University of Singapore Hermalin, B. and M.Weisbach (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic evidence. Economic Policy Review 9, 7–26 Hermalin, B.E. and M.S Weisbach (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO, American Economic Review 88, 96–118 Jensen, M.C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880 Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 275-303 Kocourek, P. F., Burger, Christian and Birchard, Bill (2003). Corporate governance: Hard facts about soft behaviors, Strategy & Business. Spring Le Quang Canh (2013). Governance models of private economic groups in Vietnam, Proposal submitted to National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (unpublished Manuscripts) Lipton, M. and J. Lorsch (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59-77 Ministry of Finance (2012). Circular No. 121/2012/TT-BTC dated on July 26, 2012 issuing the regulations on corporate governance which is applied to public companies OECD (2004). OECD principles of corporate governance, OECD Rechner, L. and Dalton, D. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis, Strategic Management Journal, 2, pp. 155-160 Vo and Phan (2013). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam, http://www.murdoch.edu.au/School-of-Management-and-Governance/_document/Australian-Conference-of-Economists/Corporate-governance-and-firm-performance.pdf [access on July 2, 2014] Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/81062 |