Kaufmann, Daniel (2004): Corruption, Governance and Security: Challenges for the Rich Countries and the World. Published in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_8207.pdf Download (149kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Traditionally, national governance and corruption challenges have been seen as: i) particularly daunting in the poorer countries, with the richer world viewed as exemplary; ii) anchored within a legalistic framework and focused on formal institutions, iii) a challenge within public sectors, and, iv) divorced from global governance or security issues - seen as separate fields. Through an empirical approach based on the analysis of the 2004 survey of enterprises by the World Economic Forum, we challenge these notions and portray a more complex reality. We suggest that the undue emphasis on narrow legalism has obscured more subtle yet costly manifestations of misgovernance, which afflict rich countries as well.
Emphasis is also given to measurement and analysis of misgovernance when the rules of the game have been captured by the elite through undue influence. We construct a new set of ethics indices, encompassing forms of (legal) corruption not subject to measurement in conventional (illegal) corruption indicators. It is found that manifestations of legal corruption may be more prevalent than illegal forms, such as outright bribery, and particularly so in richer countries.
Further, we find that governance constraints, and corruption in particular, is a key determinant of a country's global competitiveness. These findings challenge traditional notions of what constitutes the country's 'investment climate', and who shapes it. It is also found that illegal forms of corruption continue to be prevalent in the interaction between transnationals of the rich world and the public sectors in many emerging countries. Finally, we suggest an empirical link between governance and security issues.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Corruption, Governance and Security: Challenges for the Rich Countries and the World |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O16 - Financial Markets ; Saving and Capital Investment ; Corporate Finance and Governance C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General |
Item ID: | 8207 |
Depositing User: | Laisa Daza |
Date Deposited: | 10 Apr 2008 14:10 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 14:29 |
References: | Arquilla, J., B. Hoffman, B. Jenkins, I. Lesser, D. Ronfeldt, and M. Zanini. 1999. Countering the New Terrorism. RAND Corporation. Barber, B. 2001. “Jihad vs, McWorld-Terrorism’s Challenge to Democracy.” New York: Ballantine, Random House. Eizenstat, S., J. E. Porter, and J. Weinstein. 2004. On the Brink: Weak States and US National Security. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development. Hellman, J., G. Jones and D. Kaufmann. 2003. “Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption, and Influence in Transition Economies.” Journal of Comparative Economies, Vol. 31(4). 751–773. Online:http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pubs/seizestate.html. Hellman, J. S., G. Jones, and D. Kaufmann. 2002. “Far from Home: Do Foreign Investors Import Higher Standards of Governance in Transition Economies?” Draft. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Online: http://ssrn.com/abstract=386900 Hellman, J., and D. Kaufmann. 2004. “The Inequality of Influence.” Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition. J. Kornai and S. Rose-Ackerman, eds. New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=386901 Kaufmann, D. 2003. “Governance Crossroads.” Global Competitiveness Report 2002-2003. P. Cornelius, K. Schwab and M. E. Porter, eds. New York: Oxford University Press. Online:http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pubs/rethink_gov.html Kaufmann, D. 2004. “Governance Redux: The Empirical Challenge.” In The Global Competitiveness Report 2003–2004. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Economic Forum. Online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=541322 Kaufmann, D. and A. Kraay. 2002. “Growth without Governance.” Economia 3(1). 169–229. Online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=316861 Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi. 2003. “Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators 1996–2002.” World Bank Economic Review. September 2004. Washington, DC: World Bank. Online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=405841 The Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. 2003. “Root Causes of Terrorism Findings.” Report of international expert meeting, 9–11 June 2003. Oslo. Online: http://www.nupi.no/IPS/filestore/Root_Causes_report.pdf Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1999. “Anti-Bribery Convention”. Paris. Online: http://www.oecd.org/ Pillar, P. 2001. Terrorism and US Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Transparency International Index on Corruption. Online: http://www.transparency.org United States Department of Justice and Department of Commerce.1977. “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Anti-bribery Provisions.”Washington, DC. Online: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pdf/govredux.pdf World Bank. 2003. “Doing business in 2004.” Washington, DC. Online: http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDS_IBank_Servlet?pcont=details&eid=000090341_20031104153559 World Bank. 2004. “World Development Indicators 2004.” Washington, DC. Online: http://www.worldbank.org/data/wdi2004/ World Economic Forum. 1998–2004. “Executive Opinion Survey.” Global Competitiveness Report. Oxford, UK. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/8207 |